Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Optics Theory -

Optics Theory - This forum is aimed towards the TECHNICAL side of photographic OPTICS THEORY. There will be some overlap by camera/manufacturer, but this forum is for the heavy duty tech discussions. This is NOT the place to discuss a specific lens or lens line, do that in the appropriate forum. This is the forum to discuss optics or lenses in general, to learn about the tech behind the lenses and images. IF you have a question about a specific lens, post it in the forum about that type of camera, NOT HERE.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 06-14-2012   #26
rodt16s
Registered User
 
rodt16s is offline
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Wiltshire UK
Posts: 259
I have the 2" f/2 Taylor - Hobson Anastigmat, which came with the Reid... an unsung classic from the early 50's.
__________________
M's, & OM's
Just taking pics of stuff.
flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2012   #27
S.H.
Picture taker
 
S.H.'s Avatar
 
S.H. is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Near Bordeaux (France)
Age: 31
Posts: 371
I'm still shooting with my Opton 50 1.5. Quite nice. I think they can compare with a 1st version Summilux even if they are 10 years younger, but ymmv. I also use from time to time prewar jena sonnars. All these if they are clean are good performers, if you do not need maximum modern "performance" (sharpness is sometime overrated as a pictural quality, and if I want some a have a '53 Rolleiflex ).

By the way, there are also the Schneider Xenon f1.5 and f2, and the Rodenstock Heligon f2 in this time frame. I have one Heligon on a cheap retina, I have yet to try it.
__________________
some pictures
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2012   #28
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
 
Gabriel M.A.'s Avatar
 
Gabriel M.A. is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Paris, Frons
Posts: 10,106
Quote:
Originally Posted by sparrow6224 View Post
Just curious what very well informed people think, I've never seen the question put broadly to cover all contenders: the year is, let's say, 1954. Which of the available fast 50mm do you want to be shooting

I can't! I've been informed I wasn't born yet
__________________
Big wig wisdom: "Who the hell wants to hear actors talk?" --Harry Warner, of Warner Bros., 1927

Fellow RFF member: I respect your bandwidth by not posting images larger than 800px on the longest side, and by removing image in a quote.
Together we can combat bandwidth waste (and image scrolling).



My Flickr | (one of) My Portfolio
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2012   #29
seakayaker1
Registered User
 
seakayaker1's Avatar
 
seakayaker1 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,194
I have a 1951 Ernst Leitz Wetzlar Summitar 5 cm f/2 which I enjoy. A compact lens that has great optical quality and works to today on the M with an LTM adaptor.
__________________
______________________

Life is Grand! ~~~ Dan
~ M9, M6 TTL & MP ~ Mamiya 7 II ~ GF1 ~ K5IIs
~ Rolleiflex f3.5 with Carl Zeiss 75mm Planar (type 4) ~
The hardest part of starting a new project is starting it ~ Keith Carter
Flickr Sets: http://www.flickr.com/photos/26672618@N03/sets/
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2012   #30
peterm1
Registered User
 
peterm1's Avatar
 
peterm1 is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,823
For my money I would be happy to be shooting any of the following

- The LTM Summitar and Summarit (although the latter is better perhaps as a special use lens) The Sumitar is a lens that I think of as being half way between the Summar and the Summicron, so for this reason would leave the Summar off the list.

- The Summicron (of course)

- The Canon f1.8 (It has to be about on par with the Summicron but to my eyes has a more "modern" look to its images.)

- The prewar Zeiss f1.5 (I cant speak for the others as I haev not used them)

And yes if the Canon f1.4 were available in 1954 I would be happy to use it - but I think it came later as I do not recall seeing it in a chrome mount. I owned a black and chrome one which again like the f1.8 was very sharp - and like the 1.8 rendered in a quite modern way.

On the other hand the 50mm f1.5 definitely was available in chrome (and hence was available earlier - although I cant recall without accessing my reference books if it was in 1954). I had one of these that was a bit knocked about although optically perfect. If I only had one lens I think this would be the one. This lens is a killer (as its price on eBay now attests.)

All of these lenses have excellent capabilities
__________________
Peter M

Flickr me: http://www.flickr.com/photos/80702381@N00/[SIGPIC]
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 19:06.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.