Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Cameras / Gear / Photography > Leicas and other Leica Mount Cameras > Canon Leica Screw Mount Film Rangefinders

Canon Leica Screw Mount Film Rangefinders For classic Leica Screw Mount Canon Rangefinders.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Old 05-18-2013   #121
ShmadowShmetail
Registered User
 
ShmadowShmetail is offline
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by tenderobject View Post
got mine for $70+ but i'm still not sure if thats worth it haha i'm cheap but since i got it from keh i'm hoping it would be fine after a good CLA. these lenses varies from $150-$200 for a good copy..
The prices seem to be higher these days. I have been looking for a good copy.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-03-2013   #122
Captain
Registered User
 
Captain is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 265
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShmadowShmetail View Post
The prices seem to be higher these days. I have been looking for a good copy.
So what would a heavy chrome (non serenar) version of this lens fetch in the classifieds do people think?
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-15-2014   #123
projectphill
Registered User
 
projectphill is offline
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 32
Question where can I purchase the LTM to M adapter for the Canon Rangefinder 50mm F 1.8 Leica Screw Mount LTM M39 RF Lens?
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-15-2014   #124
Scrambler
Registered User
 
Scrambler's Avatar
 
Scrambler is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Toowoomba
Posts: 1,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by projectphill View Post
Question where can I purchase the LTM to M adapter for the Canon Rangefinder 50mm F 1.8 Leica Screw Mount LTM M39 RF Lens?
Um... nearly anywhere. New from Cameraquest or Leica, or any number of eBay sellers. Any 50mm LTM-M adapter will work. I use chromed brass Chinese eBay versions, never had issues with focus or fit.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-15-2014   #125
Mackinaw
Think Different
 
Mackinaw is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: One hour south of the Mackinaw Bridge
Posts: 2,857
Also, Igor Camera has a few in stock.

Jim B.
__________________
My fancy-schmancy gallery:

http://snowcountryphotography.com

My RFF Gallery:

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/phot...user=1453&sl=m
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-15-2014   #126
projectphill
Registered User
 
projectphill is offline
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrambler View Post
Um... nearly anywhere. New from Cameraquest or Leica, or any number of eBay sellers. Any 50mm LTM-M adapter will work. I use chromed brass Chinese eBay versions, never had issues with focus or fit.
Sweet thank you
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-16-2014   #127
kuuan
plays with lenses
 
kuuan's Avatar
 
kuuan is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,859
this thread needs more photos!

NNEX5n, Boudha, Kathmandu


Ricoh GXR M, orphan's home, Saigon


Ricoh GXR M, Lebih beach, Bali


Ricoh GXR M, China town, Saigon
__________________
my photos on flickr: : https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-22-2014   #128
Fixcinater
Never enough smoky peat
 
Fixcinater is offline
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Portales, NM, USA
Posts: 407
Just picked up a version 2 w/meters (f/22) and haze on the first surface of the rear group. Hopefully I can get it cleaned up, I want to get my 50s down to Canon 50/1.2 and 1.8 or maybe the 1.2 and a J-8 if the Canons are too similar.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-23-2014   #129
Mark C
Registered User
 
Mark C is offline
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 406
It is hard to imagine the Canons will be very similar; the 1.2 is a pretty wacky lens. I like mine and need to use it more, but it has not been my idea of a general purpose lens. The 1.8 should be a nice all around, well corrected lens with much better edge performance. I'm starting to care a bit less about that lately, but it is certainly something nice to have when you need it.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-11-2014   #130
bmiller128
Registered User
 
bmiller128 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 14
Chrome Canon 50/1.8 on M3, TMax 100.

At f/2:
Quakertown Farmers Market by bmiller128, on Flickr

Wide open:
Telephone Pole by bmiller128, on Flickr

At f/2.8:
House and Trees by bmiller128, on Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-11-2014   #131
bmiller128
Registered User
 
bmiller128 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 14
Some interesting bokeh at f/5.6: Chrome Canon 50/1.8, on M3, TMax 400:

Branch and Bokeh by bmiller128, on Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-14-2014   #132
Tijmendal
Young photog
 
Tijmendal is offline
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Age: 26
Posts: 494
So, I've got some haze on my copy as well. I opened the lens up, but it's all on the elements in front of the aperture. I don't know how to get there. I did remove the front-retainer ring, but that allowed me only to the very first elemnt.
Does anyone know how to get to the elements in front of the aperture blades (coming from the rear of the lens)?
Thanks.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-14-2015   #133
superultramega
Registered User
 
superultramega is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 49
In viewing the photos in this thread I think the lens handles flare well. But I'm curious how people think the Canon deals with flare if a lens hood isn't used. My Canon Serenar copy was just repaired/cleaned but I don't have a hood. I'm excited to use it on my upcoming trip to Texas to see/photograph my pregnant friend but I'm a little anxious about late afternoon light. Thoughts?
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-19-2015   #134
bmiller128
Registered User
 
bmiller128 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 14
I don't have a hood either, and I haven't really noticed any problems with flare. Here's a wide-open test shot with a flashlight free to flare away:
Canon 50/1.8 at f/1.8 by bmiller128, on Flickr

(See also the rest of the flickr album for the same shot with other lenses, if you want to compare.)

Also in my "House and Trees" shot a few posts back, there was some pretty harsh sun coming from the side. I may have shaded the lens with my hand.

-Ben

Quote:
Originally Posted by superultramega View Post
In viewing the photos in this thread I think the lens handles flare well. But I'm curious how people think the Canon deals with flare if a lens hood isn't used. My Canon Serenar copy was just repaired/cleaned but I don't have a hood. I'm excited to use it on my upcoming trip to Texas to see/photograph my pregnant friend but I'm a little anxious about late afternoon light. Thoughts?
  Reply With Quote

Canon 50 f1.8 ltm
Old 03-14-2015   #135
briansilcox
Registered User
 
briansilcox's Avatar
 
briansilcox is offline
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 81
Canon 50 f1.8 ltm

Canon IIF with 50 f1.8 shot in 1982. When I scanned the Kodachrome recently, I marvelled at the clarity of this lens.




Brian Silcox

http://www.flightof2photography.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-26-2015   #136
cRonaldo07
Registered User
 
cRonaldo07 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1
Thank you for this thread, i bought the serenar with no regret

Mine open wide with Portra 160
My Sister by Adiva Setiawan, on Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-26-2015   #137
Greyscale
Registered User
 
Greyscale's Avatar
 
Greyscale is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Fort Dodge Iowa
Age: 57
Posts: 3,377
Somehow, I have found myself with two of these, an early chrome and a later black version.


Canon IVF, Kodak BW400CN by Greyscale3, on Flickr


Canon IVF, Serenar 50/1.8, CVS 400 film, iPhone light meter app by Greyscale3, on Flickr
__________________
my flickr

My RFF Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-25-2015   #138
John E Earley
Tuol Sleng S21-0174
 
John E Earley's Avatar
 
John E Earley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Virginia
Age: 70
Posts: 1,896
I have a chrome non-Serenar version with clear glass though slightly scratched front lens and it seems to work great. I also recently picked up a version 3 that looks mint but came with some internal haze that cleaned nicely. Both lenses were purchased within the last few months for less than $100 each.

In the past I had a Serenar chrome version that had the internal haze but as mentioned, it was an easy job to clean it and it was like new. I traded it off but the recent purchases solved that issue.
__________________
Creation stands with neck outstreached....
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-26-2015   #139
goamules
Registered User
 
goamules is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,640
My very clean later chrome one, I'm starting to shoot again to compare to my Summicron.

__________________
Garrett

My Flickr Photos
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-27-2015   #140
farlymac
PF McFarland
 
farlymac's Avatar
 
farlymac is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 5,276
That's a helluva way to fix an ingrown toenail.

PF
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-20-2016   #141
f.hayek
Registered User
 
f.hayek is offline
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 11
Can't say I'm crazy for the colors. B&W appears to be its raison d'Ítre.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-25-2016   #142
lxmike
M2 love
 
lxmike's Avatar
 
lxmike is offline
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Co Durham NE England
Posts: 2,502
just grabbed one of these for £125 it seems haze free, will see if that is the case on arrival
__________________
Leica M2, Nikon F Ftn photomic, Fuji X100, XE-1, X Pro-1

myblog:lifefromawindow

myRFFgallery:
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-25-2016   #143
Bingley
Registered User
 
Bingley's Avatar
 
Bingley is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 5,280
I have a clean and clear chrome and black version:

Lisbon by bingley0522, on Flickr
__________________
Steve

M2, R2A, IIIc, IVSB2, & T, and assorted LTM & M lenses
Minolta XD11, Pentax ME Super, and assorted MD Rokkor and Takumar lenses, Rolleicord III, Rolleicord Vb, Rolleiflex Automat MX-EVS




My Flickr
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-25-2016   #144
Bingley
Registered User
 
Bingley's Avatar
 
Bingley is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 5,280
And the Canon 50/1.8 is no slouch when it comes to black and white, either:

Jardim Botanico by bingley0522, on Flickr
__________________
Steve

M2, R2A, IIIc, IVSB2, & T, and assorted LTM & M lenses
Minolta XD11, Pentax ME Super, and assorted MD Rokkor and Takumar lenses, Rolleicord III, Rolleicord Vb, Rolleiflex Automat MX-EVS




My Flickr
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-10-2016   #145
p-c
Registered User
 
p-c is offline
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 12
The Canon 50/1.8 LTM comes in many versions/types. Have any of you noticed any differences in image quality between types? I'm particularly interested in differences between 10 or 11 aperture blade 50/1.8's and the newer 8 aperture blade 50/1.8's. Wouldn't the bokeh have small differences?
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-10-2016   #146
lynnb
Registered User
 
lynnb's Avatar
 
lynnb is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 6,947
Canon 50mm f1.8 LTM, Agfa APX100 in Rodinal. Canon P.




__________________
Lynn
RFF Gallery
Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-10-2016   #147
kuuan
plays with lenses
 
kuuan's Avatar
 
kuuan is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,859

Untitled
by andreas, on Flickr, on Ricoh GXR M in Kathmandu
__________________
my photos on flickr: : https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-10-2016   #148
ChrisPlatt
Thread Killer
 
ChrisPlatt's Avatar
 
ChrisPlatt is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Queens NYC
Age: 56
Posts: 2,447
My Canon 50/1.8 LTM lens is a later silver model with black rubber grip.
I detect none of the famous Canon haze.
Either I got lucky or a previous owner did a nice job cleaning it.

BTW I am looking for a 40mm yellow-green filter to fit this lens.
Please PM if you have one for sale.

TIA,
Chris
__________________
Bring back the latent image!
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-10-2016   #149
jnclde
Registered User
 
jnclde is offline
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 64
I currently own the type I and truly enjoy it's performance, but just got a deal on the type IV which is a measly ~180g compared the the ~270g of the type I. I'm psyched for it's arrival. I will probably be posting my type I in the classifieds soon since I won't be needing it any longer.

AA023-2 by Jean Claude Araque, on Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-03-2016   #150
Bingley
Registered User
 
Bingley's Avatar
 
Bingley is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 5,280
Time to bump this thread, particularly in view of Roland's comparison of fast Canon RF lenses including the 50/1.8, here: http://www.rangefinderforum.com/foru...d.php?t=155193
__________________
Steve

M2, R2A, IIIc, IVSB2, & T, and assorted LTM & M lenses
Minolta XD11, Pentax ME Super, and assorted MD Rokkor and Takumar lenses, Rolleicord III, Rolleicord Vb, Rolleiflex Automat MX-EVS




My Flickr
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-03-2016   #151
Bingley
Registered User
 
Bingley's Avatar
 
Bingley is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 5,280
Map break by bingley0522, on Flickr
__________________
Steve

M2, R2A, IIIc, IVSB2, & T, and assorted LTM & M lenses
Minolta XD11, Pentax ME Super, and assorted MD Rokkor and Takumar lenses, Rolleicord III, Rolleicord Vb, Rolleiflex Automat MX-EVS




My Flickr
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-03-2016   #152
Bingley
Registered User
 
Bingley's Avatar
 
Bingley is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 5,280
Belem by bingley0522, on Flickr
__________________
Steve

M2, R2A, IIIc, IVSB2, & T, and assorted LTM & M lenses
Minolta XD11, Pentax ME Super, and assorted MD Rokkor and Takumar lenses, Rolleicord III, Rolleicord Vb, Rolleiflex Automat MX-EVS




My Flickr
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-03-2016   #153
Bingley
Registered User
 
Bingley's Avatar
 
Bingley is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 5,280
Our gang by bingley0522, on Flickr
__________________
Steve

M2, R2A, IIIc, IVSB2, & T, and assorted LTM & M lenses
Minolta XD11, Pentax ME Super, and assorted MD Rokkor and Takumar lenses, Rolleicord III, Rolleicord Vb, Rolleiflex Automat MX-EVS




My Flickr
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-02-2017   #154
lundrog
Registered User
 
lundrog's Avatar
 
lundrog is offline
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MN, Sartell
Posts: 75
Here are a few from today from mine. No edits just a frame added.

Serial number 145406. Pictures in the gallery.

Highly under used lens by me.

http://photography.rogerlund.net/Gal...n-50mm-18-LTM/


Anyone have a production date for this type 1?
__________________
Roger Lund
Canon EOS-M, Fuji X-E2, Helois 44-0 Vintage, Helois 44-4, Canon FD 50mm 1.8, Jupiter 8 50mm F2, Jupiter 3 50mm F1.5, Canon Serenar 50mm 1.9, Canon 50mm 1.8 LTM, Canon Serenar 85mm F2, Leica 50mm f2 summar, E.Ludwig 50mm F2.9, Rekagon will.wetzlar 50mm 2.8,, a.schacht ulm travenar 135mm F3.5, CZJ 29mm 2.8 Hoya 28mm 2.8, CZ Tessar 50mm 2.8, MIR 37mm. 2.8, Porst Color Reflex MC 50mm 1.7, Vivitar 28mm 2.8 mc cf
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-03-2017   #155
kuuan
plays with lenses
 
kuuan's Avatar
 
kuuan is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,859
according to the Cameramuseum site the 1.8/50 "chrome" or "Ver.1" was sold from starting November 1951: http://global.canon/en/c-museum/product/s18.html

according to the more detailed information in Peter Kitchingman's book on Canon rangefinder lenses your's is a "Type 4", these have serial numbers 88596 to 170760 and were produced between 4/1953 and 3/1956. That would make 1955 the most probable year of production of your lens
__________________
my photos on flickr: : https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-03-2017   #156
lundrog
Registered User
 
lundrog's Avatar
 
lundrog is offline
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MN, Sartell
Posts: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by kuuan View Post
according to the Cameramuseum site the 1.8/50 "chrome" or "Ver.1" was sold from starting November 1951: http://global.canon/en/c-museum/product/s18.html

according to the more detailed information in Peter Kitchingman's book on Canon rangefinder lenses your's is a "Type 4", these have serial numbers 88596 to 170760 and were produced between 4/1953 and 3/1956. That would make 1955 the most probable year of production of your lens
Wonderful info, thanks!
__________________
Roger Lund
Canon EOS-M, Fuji X-E2, Helois 44-0 Vintage, Helois 44-4, Canon FD 50mm 1.8, Jupiter 8 50mm F2, Jupiter 3 50mm F1.5, Canon Serenar 50mm 1.9, Canon 50mm 1.8 LTM, Canon Serenar 85mm F2, Leica 50mm f2 summar, E.Ludwig 50mm F2.9, Rekagon will.wetzlar 50mm 2.8,, a.schacht ulm travenar 135mm F3.5, CZJ 29mm 2.8 Hoya 28mm 2.8, CZ Tessar 50mm 2.8, MIR 37mm. 2.8, Porst Color Reflex MC 50mm 1.7, Vivitar 28mm 2.8 mc cf
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-07-2017   #157
Ko.Fe.
Me. Write ESL. Ko.
 
Ko.Fe.'s Avatar
 
Ko.Fe. is offline
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: MiltON.ONtario
Age: 50
Posts: 4,735
$99 +11$ fast shipping 50 1.8 LTM just arrived from Japan. On focus test target it is front focusing about 5 cm if wide open, but in real world stations it is surprisingly not so critical.

On M-E.

At f8 I could read all of the info on the dog's tag.





f2.8.





f1.8



Looking forward to test it on M3 ELC.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-07-2017   #158
cooltouch
Registered User
 
cooltouch's Avatar
 
cooltouch is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 72
I bought a Canon IIIa rangefinder camera that had a Type 1 50mm f/1.8 Serenar attached to it for $250 back in 2009. I felt I was paying close to "top of the market" for the camera and lens back then, until I researched just what the lens sold for. Even back in 2009, it went for a pretty good chunk of change. And I soon began to appreciate why.

Here's a pic of a couple of acorns I took with this lens. The camera was an EOS DSLR and I was using just a simple M39 to EOS adapter for this image. I was maybe 8 or 10 inches away from the acorns when I took the shot. The Serenar was stopped down to f/8. See that brown spot on the closest acorn?



Here's a 100% crop of the above image showing that "spot."


And a few B&W images. Film was some old, expired Plus-X Pan, developed in D-76.






  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 21:45.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.