Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Cameras / Gear / Photography > Classic Film RangeFinders & Other Classics > Olympus RF

Olympus RF This forum is for the Olympus rangefinders.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Olympus XA vs XA 2 image quality
Old 11-12-2016   #1
papo
Registered User
 
papo is offline
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 63
Olympus XA vs XA 2 image quality

I know that the XA has a 2.8 aperture while the XA 2 is equipped with a 3.5 but is there a visible difference in image quality?

While we at it, my the zone focus lever of my XA2 is sluggish/hard to move - any advice?
Thanks!
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-12-2016   #2
jmilkins
Digited User
 
jmilkins's Avatar
 
jmilkins is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: landdownunder
Posts: 1,038
Both great little camera with different lenses and functions/ levels of adjustment. i personally like the XA and XA4, but I have never owned an XA2.

It has been discussed a few times - try this thread for a start.

Have fun shooting.
__________________
cheers, John

My gallery
The FlickR

"To ∞, and beyond!" B. Lightyear, 1995.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-12-2016   #3
Michael I.
Registered User
 
Michael I.'s Avatar
 
Michael I. is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Israel \ Ireland
Age: 35
Posts: 1,080
The lens is great, imho, so great I had two over the years (still have one, for sale actually), so great I bought a new one after not liking the ergo and control of the first one i sold cause i missed the lens and small package so much.
__________________
My Blog\Photoblog
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-12-2016   #4
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 27,382
I have had XA, XA2, XA4. I sold off the XA2 and XA4.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007

http://raid.smugmug.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-12-2016   #5
papo
Registered User
 
papo is offline
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by raid View Post
I have had XA, XA2, XA4. I sold off the XA2 and XA4.
XA4 is also something i have been looking into because of its 28mm lens. why did you sell it?
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-13-2016   #6
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 27,382
I did not not know better then. I may have bought it for $25 and then sold it for $50 or so. Such cameras were cheap then.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007

http://raid.smugmug.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-13-2016   #7
Mablo
Registered User
 
Mablo is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,941
I previously had a XA but currently own and use a XA2. Both are very good for pocket camera use. The main thing I like about XA2 it's much faster to operate. Out of pocket, open up the shell and it's ready to shoot. The default focus selection is what you'd use in most cases. Personally, I can't see any difference in IQ.
__________________
Mablo
Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-13-2016   #8
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 27,382
I used to use the XA with B&W film in one pocket and a Minox GT with color film (in the other pocket). The results were excellent. Both cameras are tiny and light, and both have excellent lenses.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007

http://raid.smugmug.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-13-2016   #9
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
 
xayraa33's Avatar
 
xayraa33 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,002
I like all the lenses on the XA series, warts and all.

The whole package is important in one very unobtrusive super compact 35mm full frame camera.

I have 2 XA cameras and had a number of XA 1s, most of which I gave away to friends and family.

Don't overlook the low priced XA 1, it is a robust simple camera that does not rely on batteries, very fool proof pocket camera with a great Zuiko lens for general use, even indoors with available light.
__________________
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-13-2016   #10
ChrisPlatt
Thread Killer
 
ChrisPlatt's Avatar
 
ChrisPlatt is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Queens NYC
Age: 56
Posts: 2,360
I owned Olympus XA and XA2 cameras since new. After having the XA CLA'ed a few years ago
I had grown tired of the hard-to-see RF patch and the general fiddlyness of the XA and sold it.

My results are comparable using the faster-to-use XA2. A couple years ago I also added an XA3,
which is basically the same as the XA2 with the addition of DX coding for film speed (overrideable).

Chris
__________________
Bring back the latent image!
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-13-2016   #11
David Hughes
Registered User
 
David Hughes's Avatar
 
David Hughes is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,804
Hi,

I've had both for decades and the XA1, XA3 and XA4.

I ought to unload some of them but can't decide what to keep and vice versa. That's not much help is it? But they all have their strengths and weaknesses and decent lenses.

XA for accurate focus and "A" mode and backlight (+1) switch; XA1 for simplicity and fun as it is totally uncontrollable* except you can switch between 100 ASA and 400 ASA** to control exposure; XA2 fast to use and easy to find dirt cheap, XA3 as XA2 but DX and backlight switch and XA4 (zone focus again) for macro and that cute measuring lanyard, plus DX and backlight switch.

Regards, David

* Fixed focus I think, but not a problem.

**And it only takes 100 OR 400ASA film.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-17-2016   #12
julio1fer
Registered User
 
julio1fer's Avatar
 
julio1fer is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Uruguay
Posts: 422
I have used both. If pressed I prefer the XA2; simpler and easier, and maybe the lens is better all around.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-18-2016   #13
David Hughes
Registered User
 
David Hughes's Avatar
 
David Hughes is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,804
Hi,

The real problem is how do you compare them?

The XA1, 2, 3 and 4 have program mode on all the time and there's no way you'll know the aperture in use, unlike the XA which is aperture priority.

Mentioned because the XA wide open might look worse than an other at (say) f/5.6 and then there's camera shake caused by the shutter speed, perhaps...

My experience of them all is that they all work.

But I never/seldom print bigger than 5" x 7" and that brings another factor into it and if we post shots here they are often smaller than 4" x 6" and so on and so forth.

Regards, David
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:33.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.