Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > FSU Former Soviet Union RF

FSU Former Soviet Union RF This forum is for the Former Soviet Union rangefinder cameras, especially the many and various Fed, Zorki, and Kiev.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Length of "Imperialist" vs Soviet Film Casettes
Old 08-20-2012   #1
Thomas78
Registered User
 
Thomas78 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Düren, Germany
Age: 34
Posts: 601
Length of "Imperialist" vs Soviet Film Casettes

Hello,

I did the first roll of film trought my Zorki 4 and realised that the film was exposed a bit diagonally. I found that the film casette is positioned to low at the bottom of the chamber and has some slack.

I suppose that the original soviet film casettes were a bit longer than the western ones. So I want to put a washer under the film casette to compensate for the different length.

Do you know how much difference is in the length between this two types of casettes?

Regards,
Thomas
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-20-2012   #2
Penny Lane
Hopelessly Citrophile
 
Penny Lane's Avatar
 
Penny Lane is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The Netherlands (far end of)
Posts: 208
Here's the fun bit: that difference doesn't exist. Leicas suffered from the same 'problem'. If you look at the photos Stanley Kubrick made of Chicago in 1949 with his Leica III (such as here at Retronaut.co), you'll notice that many of the shots have the same issue...

Though a washer will go a good way to cure the problem, I've found that winding can easily get uncomfortably difficult so I've simply stopped worrying about the whole phenomenon altogether

Derk
__________________
"The scientific name of an animal that does not either fight or flee from it's enemies is 'Lunch'"
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-21-2012   #3
David Hughes
Registered User
 
David Hughes's Avatar
 
David Hughes is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,294
Hi,

Try this thread for some sizes:

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/foru...d.php?t=120930

Regards, David
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-21-2012   #4
Thomas78
Registered User
 
Thomas78 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Düren, Germany
Age: 34
Posts: 601
Thank you, Derk and David!
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-21-2012   #5
MartinP
Registered User
 
MartinP is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 2,000
As I recall (from when I checked, having bought a nice Zorki 1) the original cameras were sized for the reloadable metal cassettes made by their manufacturers. These days the disposable (ie. normal, pre-loaded, metal) cassettes as originally standardised by Kodak (for Retina?) are a millimetre or so different, and the same goes for current reloadable (plastic or metal) cassettes. So, there was evolution with the cassette measurements and the designs of the older bodies simply preceded that 'new' standard. I'm out of time, but can anyone find whatever historical article there is out there?
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-22-2012   #6
Coldkennels
Registered User
 
Coldkennels's Avatar
 
Coldkennels is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Age: 25
Posts: 321
I do know that by the time the Leica IIIf came out, the cartridge length was standardized enough for Leica to take it into account - so that's what, 1950? At any rate, I've noticed it on both the Zorkis I own (Zorki 1 and 5, both bottom-loaders), but on none of the Feds I own (or have owned in the past - two Fed 2s, a Fed 4, and a Fed 5).

Easy enough to fix, though. I used some self-adhesive foam from a light sealing kit; a small disc on the baseplate is just enough to keep the canister straight.

David, that's an interesting list, but wouldn't bottom of canister to tip of center spindle be a better measurement?
__________________
I have a flickr and a tumblr, and it turns out that I'm terrible at maintaining both. But I try.

Every fortnight, I sit down and record some ramblings about film photography which gets uploaded to pdexposures.tv.
Nate calls it a podcast. I call it a shambles. But we all have fun, and isn't that what counts?

- Tony
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-23-2012   #7
Thomas78
Registered User
 
Thomas78 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Düren, Germany
Age: 34
Posts: 601
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldkennels View Post
...
David, that's an interesting list, but wouldn't bottom of canister to tip of center spindle be a better measurement?
IMHO Davids method is better because the casette is fixated between its upper and lower ends and not at the spindle.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 17:03.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.