Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Film vs Digital

Film vs Digital Discussions about the relative advantages and disadvantages of Film vs Digital are important as they can help us understand our choices as photographers. Each medium has strengths and weaknesses which can best be used in a given circumstance. While this makes for an interesting and useful discussion, DO NOT attack others who disagree with you. Forum rules are explained in the RFF FAQ linked at the top of each page.

View Poll Results: What would entice you to try Film photography?
If someone would lend me a camera 4 26.67%
If someone would provide the camera, film, processing, and scanning 3 20.00%
None. I don't feel the need, don't even see the point 5 33.33%
Don't know 3 20.00%
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 04-05-2013   #26
ninjaslim
Registered User
 
ninjaslim's Avatar
 
ninjaslim is online now
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Guernsey
Posts: 10
I never stopped using film there's no option for that
I have a digital camera so that I can take 250 shots of a building I have to measure, I use the digital for the family snaps but film for family memories and shots of my buildings that I consider photographs
I love my iphone, instagram all the time but not sure I consider it photography.
I love my vinyl collection too, oh and my massive MP3 collection
Do it all
  Reply With Quote

Old 2 Weeks Ago   #27
wgerrard
Registered User
 
wgerrard's Avatar
 
wgerrard is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,614
Haven't been here for a long time, but here's what it would take for me to use film: A box into which I could insert a film spool, push a button, and out comes a print. A large digital display with editing capabilty before the print was made, plus creation of a RAW file to dump to my laptop would be very, very nice.

I spent a few years developing film in the kitchen, scanning it in, trying to produce acceptable prints. That wasn't fun for me. The fun is in the shooting and looking at the results. What's in the middle, film or digital, is, for me, just unwelcome legwork.
__________________
Bill
-------------------------------------
This is my only legible signature.
  Reply With Quote

Old 1 Week Ago   #28
paradoxbox
Registered User
 
paradoxbox is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 390
hope my opinion still matters but..

i started on digital. had no interest in film at all, was very excited about the latest digital gear.

what got me interested in film was the huge dynamic range that film has and the ability to take photos even with no batteries.

i remember being really annoyed that my Nikon D2X at the time couldn't handle the summer city scenes I was shooting without blowing out highlights or turning shadows into total blackness. there was not nearly enough range.

when i saw how black and white and color negative film could easily handle the range in a scene i decided to convert. that was all it took.
__________________
Epson R-D1, Ricoh GRD III, Rollei TLR's, Lots of others
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:50.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.