 |
XE-1 + Voigtlander 15 4.5 and 35 2.5 |
 |
11-07-2012
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
tekst is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 199
|
XE-1 + Voigtlander 15 4.5 and 35 2.5
|
|
|
|
11-08-2012
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Howarthp is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 52
|
Hi - I'm afraid I don't have any advice but am very interested in how you get on with the XE-1 as I'm thinking of buying one too. There are issues with processing RAW (RAF) in LR4.2 and I understand that Fuji and Adobe are working on this. However, the JPEGs are meant to be fabulous straight out of the camera.
Paul
|
|
|
|
11-08-2012
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
tekst is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 199
|
Love it so far! Haven't bothered with RAW, these are jpgs pretty much straight out of the camera using the in camera BW setting. Only editing done is bringing the black and white points in to boost contrast. May have gone overboard there.. I don't own any of the fuji lenses yet but am very happy with using m mount lenses. The only thing I've noticed is that focussing at infitite doesnt seem quite right.
|
|
|
|
11-08-2012
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
meso is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Iceland
Posts: 63
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tekst
Love it so far! Haven't bothered with RAW, these are jpgs pretty much straight out of the camera using the in camera BW setting. Only editing done is bringing the black and white points in to boost contrast. May have gone overboard there.. I don't own any of the fuji lenses yet but am very happy with using m mount lenses. The only thing I've noticed is that focussing at infitite doesnt seem quite right.
|
Are you using the Fuji M adapter or a third party one?
|
|
|
|
11-08-2012
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
tekst is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 199
|
Using the fuji adapter
|
|
|
|
11-08-2012
|
#6
|
|
actually a dude
mabelsound is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 43
Posts: 5,403
|
Most mirrorless camera adapters focus a little bit past infinity, so you can't just turn the focus wheel to the end of its travel--you have to actually focus the thing.
|
|
|
|
11-08-2012
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
tekst is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 199
|
This might be a stupid question but does that mean that setting the lens to 2m for example will actually be slightly beyond that point in camera? Also, using a wide lens for landscape, where should i be trying to focus in the scene for a large depth of field?
|
|
|
|
11-10-2012
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
tekst is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 199
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2012
|
#9
|
|
actually a dude
mabelsound is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 43
Posts: 5,403
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tekst
This might be a stupid question but does that mean that setting the lens to 2m for example will actually be slightly beyond that point in camera? Also, using a wide lens for landscape, where should i be trying to focus in the scene for a large depth of field?
|
It won't be as precise as using it on a Leica, no--but it will be close, certainly close enough to scale focus a wide-angle in broad daylight!
|
|
|
|
11-11-2012
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
nex100 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 51
|
How do you find the cv 15/4.5 on the xe-1? Is there smearing on the corners? Some have reported smearing with this combo.
|
|
|
|
11-11-2012
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
GaryLH is online now
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,435
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mabelsound
It won't be as precise as using it on a Leica, no--but it will be close, certainly close enough to scale focus a wide-angle in broad daylight!
|
A lot depends on how far off the inf mark... If the current dof info on the rf lens will be even close...
Most third party manufacturers will make up for their manufacturing tolerances by making sure that u can focus at inf by being a little ahead of the mark. There are very few vendors that will go thru the work of guaranting true inf. and they cost a lot. I have used a lot of the cheaper (39-59 dollar) vendors in the past.. Somewhere over 50% of the time inf was off. I was lucky enough that in all cases it was easy to use brass shim to fix the inf point issue.
U are right, the wider the lens, like the 15, the more it becomes a moot point, unless the inf focus point is way off.
Gary
|
|
|
|
 |
Sigh, yeh, I see smearing, but that's ok |
 |
11-11-2012
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
eleskin is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 954
|
Sigh, yeh, I see smearing, but that's ok
Indeed, I too see smearing with the Voigtlander 15mm. I have this lens too and love it on my M8. I do not have an X series yet, but I may consider one now after looking at the new M at Photo Expo Plus. I would stick to the Fuji lenses if going wider than 35mm. For me I would pick the 35 1.4 Fujinon and the 18mm to 55mm zoom. After that, the M adapter for my 35 1.2 Nokton , 50 mm Noctilux, Summicron, and Summitar.
I have a few Minolta MD lenses as well so an adapter for that too would meek me happy!
|
|
|
|
11-11-2012
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
dejavu is offline
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 22
|
Lovely photos, very Melbourne!
I am also very interested in M-mount lenses on the X system so will love to hear your user experiences. I am getting the 14 f/2.8 XF and will let you know how that lens performs. Now, Fuji just need to hurry up and send it to distributors. It is delayed, again, to end of November.
__________________
When art critics get together, they talk about Form and Structure and Meaning.
When artists get together, they talk about where you can buy cheap turpentine.
--Pablo Picasso
Louis Tsai
Zen Galleria
|
|
|
|
11-11-2012
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
tekst is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 199
|
nex100 - Really enjoying the cv15, there is some smearing in the corners for sure. Does it bother me? Not in the slightest. Aside from the infinite focus issue as mentioned above, (which is really not a big deal) and the slight smearing on the 15, I really enjoy using M lenses on the XE-1.
Dejavu - As I mentioned in another thread, focussing with m lenses can be a little fiddly, and at first, doesnt instill confidence like a rangefinder does. But once you become confident with it, it is quick and easy. Overall I am very happy with the X system with M mount lenses. From what I've seen I'll be even more happy when I finally pick up a Fuji lense or two. But even with Voigtlanders, I'm liking the results I'm getting, as well as just using the camera in general. I would be very interested to see how the 14 turns out for you. Cheers for the kind words also.
|
|
|
|
 |
11-16-2012
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
tekst is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 199
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2012
|
#16
|
|
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
back alley is online now
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,687
|
some nice shots...i feel bad for the bike.
i have the 18 and agree that it's sharp...does not feel cheap to me though...we have to edit out these thoughts that heavy equals quality...
|
|
|
|
11-16-2012
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
tekst is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 199
|
Yes your right, but their's just something about that heft of a camera setup that feels right. Funny thing is though, I just sold a hasselblad and m4p as they weren't getting use for that reason. Well, not so much the weight of the leica, but the hasselblad and old 50mm were just too much bulk to lug around without a bag, and I'm not a fan of shooting out of a big bag.
|
|
|
|
11-23-2012
|
#18
|
|
Registered User
tekst is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 199
|
|
|
|
|
11-25-2012
|
#19
|
|
Registered User
rjx is offline
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Santa Clara, California (Bay Area)
Posts: 17
|
Nice images
__________________
“In photography, the smallest thing can be a great subject. The little, human detail can become a Leitmotiv.” Henri Cartier-Bresson
“Photos are everywhere. You just have to know how to look.” Chris Weeks
"A camera is just an instrument to help people see without a camera." Dorothea Lange
|
|
|
|
11-25-2012
|
#20
|
|
Visual Poet
Santtu Määttänen is offline
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Finland
Posts: 105
|
That last set of pictures is AMAZING!! I love that minimalistic approach. Wonderful! Would love to see those printed 
|
|
|
|
11-25-2012
|
#21
|
|
Skeptic
Jamie Pillers is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 2,867
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tekst
Yes your right, but their's just something about that heft of a camera setup that feels right. ....
|
Nothing wrong with using gaffers tape to hold some extra lead weights onto the bottom of the camera. 
__________________
Go outside and talk to someone today.
|
|
|
|
11-25-2012
|
#22
|
|
Registered User
Joosep is offline
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tallinn, Estonia
Posts: 283
|
That church picture, thats nice !
|
|
|
|
11-25-2012
|
#23
|
|
Registered User
tekst is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 199
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Santtu Määttänen
That last set of pictures is AMAZING!! I love that minimalistic approach. Wonderful! Would love to see those printed 
|
Thanks for the kinds words Santtu and others. Though shooting at that spot it's hard not to get good results! I too would love to get some of these printed large and see how they turn out, funds just don't permit at the moment unfortunately.
|
|
|
|
11-30-2012
|
#24
|
|
Registered User
tekst is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 199
|
|
|
|
|
12-01-2012
|
#25
|
|
Registered User
tekst is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 199
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:46. |
|
|