Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film > Scanners / Scanner Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

BetterScanning, Epson 700, Calibration Frustration
Old 11-01-2012   #1
Scheelings
Registered User
 
Scheelings is offline
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 137
BetterScanning, Epson 700, Calibration Frustration

Hi everyone,

I'm on the verge of giving up on film because I can't achieve sufficient scanning quality.

My equipment is as follows: Epson 700, Betterscanning film holder for medium format, anti-newton ring glass for medium format & 35mm

At the moment I have medium format film taped to the correct side of the anti-newton ring glass and I've set all the nylon screws flush with the bottom of the film holder.

So when I run my first scan I use the following settings:

Epson Scan is my default software, I use 2800 dpi and colour positive film. No Sharpening.

Then I set to 'Film Holder' (this uses a higher quality lens right?), however when I 'pre-view' the scan, it cuts all the images in half - Presumably this is because the alignment of the film taped to the glass is not the same as when using the traditional film holder. How do I adjust for this?

There must be a way to get the highest quality file by selecting 'film holder'....even if the film is not in a 'normal' position - otherwise it seems pointless to have anti-newton glass - and even without the glass - the kit comes with T-locks such that different types of Medium Format film can be placed in the holder.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-01-2012   #2
kokoshawnuff
Registered User
 
kokoshawnuff's Avatar
 
kokoshawnuff is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 564
Use film holder under document type, but instead of "thumbnail" select "normal" and you can select the entire frame with your mouse
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-02-2012   #3
EliasK
Registered User
 
EliasK's Avatar
 
EliasK is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greece
Age: 52
Posts: 310
-For thumbnail preview check that "configuration"-->"film size" is set correctly for you medium format size (can be set from 6x4.5 to 6x9)
-Also in the "preview" configuration menu check "quality preview" and set "thumbnail cropping area" to "large"
-Set "color" accordingly for your pp workflow.

Do some tests to adjust the screws for maximum sharpness.
Adding some sharpness in pp will improve your scan in most cases.







-----------------------------
__________________
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-02-2012   #4
xvvvz
Registered User
 
xvvvz is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 132
It sounds like you are experiencing the common problem where auto-cropping does not work (you did switch the format size parameter in the software configuration box to your particular format though, right?). You will find many references to this problem on the internet. Many people never realize that they are missing part of their image(s) until they get an obvious error like the one you experienced. If they did a careful comparison of most scans though, they would probably be surprised to find how many of their images on film are overly cropped or mis-cropped by the software's auto-cropping. Auto-cropping is nothing more than a "guess" based on an algorithm and it is often fooled.

Most people I know just set a batch scan of manual crops. It is easy to set up and you know it will be accurate. In the end, this actually takes less time because you don't have to spend time doing comparisons of scans to film and then have to do the inevitable rescans. The others have pointed you in the right directetion but here is a page of tips I put up to help people learn about creating manual batch scans with the EpsonScan software:

http://www.betterscanning.com/scanni...hscanning.html

Doug
__________________
www.BetterScanning.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-04-2012   #5
Scheelings
Registered User
 
Scheelings is offline
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 137
Thanks for all the replies guys. I'm still working on getting the scanner calibrated. At the moment I'm scanning by half turns for a rough 4mm adjustment each time.

Here's the thing - I'm worried that I don't have a perfectly calibrated camera (I've adjusted it myself - so now the lens DOES focus properly to infinity) - but I can't be sure. It's a Mamiya 7.

I think if I'm getting OOF images in all my scans, that I'll go out and shoot some film with my M3 - and a lens which I KNOW is accurate.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-05-2012   #6
mfogiel
Registered User
 
mfogiel's Avatar
 
mfogiel is offline
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Monaco
Posts: 2,643
The biggest problem with Epson is film flatnes, then there's the holder "focus". Given that you have taped the film to a piece of glass, it should be reasonably sharp. Now calibrate your holder focus. Remember to scan at highest resolution - you will resize down after the scan, this way you get maximum resolution. In practice, it does not exceed 2200-2400 dpi, so resizing down to 3200 dpi will certainly not hurt your sharpness. As to camera sharpness, if you have doubts, take a wide angle lens, set to infinity and stop down to f 22, this should get you sharp negs in most cases.
Epson is not anything to rave about, but it should be good enough for a 8x enlargement, and is particularly forgiving for B&W.
__________________
MY PORTFOLIOS


WTB: TAKUMAR 58/2.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-05-2012   #7
thegman
Registered User
 
thegman is online now
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London
Age: 33
Posts: 2,963
I used a very similar set up, but a few differences.

I did not tape the film to the glass, I just put the back arch of the film's curl against the glass and let the weight of the glass pin down the film in the holder. I found this got me some pretty flat film.

I also used Vuescan, so you could try a trial of that, but I doubt that's the issue.

The Mamiya 7, and V700, all configured right should be giving you incredible results, right up there with digital medium format.
__________________
My Blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-05-2012   #8
Rangefinderfreak
Registered User
 
Rangefinderfreak's Avatar
 
Rangefinderfreak is offline
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: In Dreams
Posts: 313
I have the Epson and now I aquired a used FlexTight II. After that I never use Epson for film scanning. Huh! the only problem with The Hasselblad Flextight is that it works only with an ancient Mac. I have two of them, one as spare in case the first gives up. The Epson is good only for print scanning. I make a decent low contrast print with my Multigrade leitz Focomat IIC, scan it in Epson, spot, adjust the curves, burn & hold back in photoshop. Then I have a perfect file to bring to a friend that prints my exhibition prints in EPSON, what else...
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-05-2012   #9
Scheelings
Registered User
 
Scheelings is offline
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 137
Thanks for the tips guys. Well - One thing I could do to 'guarantee' a sharp image is to slap a 12mm ultra wide angle onto my Leica M3 and shoot a roll of 35mm.

Then I just tape the 35mm film to the medium format glass and try scanning that.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:13.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.