Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > TLR Forum - Twin Lens Reflex

TLR Forum - Twin Lens Reflex another alternative to the dreaded SLR way of seeing, this forum for all format TLR cameras

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

travel tripod for Rolleiflex 2.8E
Old 10-18-2012   #1
TheFlyingCamera
Registered User
 
TheFlyingCamera is offline
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 81
travel tripod for Rolleiflex 2.8E

I'm planning a vacation trip (a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to go to Cuba before the end of the Castro era), and I'm taking the Rollei. I'm looking around for a good, compact travel tripod for occasional use - there is a per-person weight limit of 44 lbs total luggage (including carry-on!) coming in to Cuba, so it has to be light!

recommendations sought - something that can handle the Rollei and fit in a suitcase. I'd also like to keep the budget on the low side of $300. So forget about Gitzo carbon fiber. Probably forget most carbon fiber tripods for that matter (although if something could be found say for $310 and was hands-down superior and saved a full pound of weight or something, I'm open to it).
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2012   #2
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 18,253
Redged.

Sirui.

Cheers,

R.
__________________
Now even more free photography information on www.rogerandfrances.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2012   #3
laurentb
Registered User
 
laurentb is offline
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFlyingCamera View Post
I'm planning a vacation trip (a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to go to Cuba before the end of the Castro era), and I'm taking the Rollei. I'm looking around for a good, compact travel tripod for occasional use - there is a per-person weight limit of 44 lbs total luggage (including carry-on!) coming in to Cuba, so it has to be light!

recommendations sought - something that can handle the Rollei and fit in a suitcase. I'd also like to keep the budget on the low side of $300. So forget about Gitzo carbon fiber. Probably forget most carbon fiber tripods for that matter (although if something could be found say for $310 and was hands-down superior and saved a full pound of weight or something, I'm open to it).
I'm very happy with a table top tripod for the 3.5 Rolleiflex. I made a 10 cm extension because it's sometimes way too low, but it's become my "extreme light weight" option.

If I want bigger then the Velbon RF645 (not sure how it's called in the US) with a Manfrotto ball head works fine. It's carbon so it's light, and the budget is not as high as a Gitzo's
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2012   #4
jeanba3000
squareLover
 
jeanba3000's Avatar
 
jeanba3000 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 68
The cheapest, lightest and smallest though efficient pod is the "foot-cord" : You attach one end of a simple cord to your camera, with the other end you tie a loop large enough to insert a foot. The half inserted foot will block the cord to the ground, then you draw your camera upwards until the cord is tended (the length should be enough to reach the height you usually hold your camera), so the camera is vertically immobillized, which is most of the time enough for relatively slow exposures.

Other way I like the Gitzo Carbon Traveler series (GT1541T etc.), expensive but as we say in french : the price is forgotten, the quality remains (a famous quote from a famous french movie Les Tontons flingueurs) :-)
__________________
::: [ jeanba.photo ] ::: [ jeanba.work ] :::
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2012   #5
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 18,253
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeanba3000 View Post
The cheapest, lightest and smallest though efficient pod is the "foot-cord" : You attach one end of a simple cord to your camera, with the other end you tie a loop large enough to insert a foot. The half inserted foot will block the cord to the ground, then you draw your camera upwards until the cord is tended (the length should be enough to reach the height you usually hold your camera), so the camera is vertically immobillized, which is most of the time enough for relatively slow exposures.. . .
Works for some. But there are also those who find that they get less sharpness this way, including me and whoever tested it a few months back in AP magazine in the UK.

Cheers,

R.
__________________
Now even more free photography information on www.rogerandfrances.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2012   #6
matt_mcg2
Registered User
 
matt_mcg2 is offline
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 138
Me too, on the foot cord. Didn't work for me at all. In fact, the standard neck strap, on the Rollei is much more useful (for me).
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2012   #7
crispy12
Registered User
 
crispy12's Avatar
 
crispy12 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 258
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Hicks View Post
Sirui.
+1 from me too. I have two models, but I like the smallest compact version called the T-005. It's aluminium and actually fits in my Domke F2, and almost fits in my Domke F3/Billingham Hadley (top sticks out by an inch). Much more stable than a 'foot cord' and works very well for smaller cameras. I got mine for about $100.

The other model I have is the T1204X. Much sturdier but more pricey and larger as well. Link here. I got it on sale at about $170.

Here's a photo of the T005 for scale. Haven't read much about this brand online but I'm a huge fan. The tripod mount is arca swiss so you can easily get multiple base plates.
__________________
flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2012   #8
MarcoVenturiniAutier
Registered User
 
MarcoVenturiniAutier is offline
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Durham, England
Posts: 9
I am for light and cheap. I like very much my Giotto's MT9340B. Especially for light medium format with vertical viewfinder.
I wrote a few comments here:

http://shade-of-light.com/2012/09/13...travel-tripod/
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2012   #9
chrishayton
Registered User
 
chrishayton is offline
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: England
Age: 25
Posts: 496
Velbon Rexi L. Highly recommended. Its tiny yet extends to full size and is sturdy enough for my ebony 4x5. very inexpensive too
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2012   #10
jslabovitz
Registered User
 
jslabovitz's Avatar
 
jslabovitz is offline
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 33
I have a Feisol CT-3442 I bought about six months ago, and am quite happy with it. Originally I bought it for a Hasselblad 500cm, but have also used it with a Bronica RF645, and more recently with my Rolleiflex. I think it's a perfect fit with the Rollei -- very well balanced, and easy to move around (as well as to pack).

I got it from Really Big Cameras for $309, it appears. Now, I also bought a ballhead (Photo Clam PC-44NS) and adaptor that nearly doubled that, so it might be way out of your budget if you go that way.

--John
__________________
--John
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2012   #11
retnull
Registered User
 
retnull is offline
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 475
Another vote for the Sirui -- very light, well-designed, well-crafted. I have the T-025 which is perfect for medium format (I even use it for 4x5 sometimes).
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-19-2012   #12
TheFlyingCamera
Registered User
 
TheFlyingCamera is offline
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 81
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeanba3000 View Post
The cheapest, lightest and smallest though efficient pod is the "foot-cord" : You attach one end of a simple cord to your camera, with the other end you tie a loop large enough to insert a foot. The half inserted foot will block the cord to the ground, then you draw your camera upwards until the cord is tended (the length should be enough to reach the height you usually hold your camera), so the camera is vertically immobillized, which is most of the time enough for relatively slow exposures.

Other way I like the Gitzo Carbon Traveler series (GT1541T etc.), expensive but as we say in french : the price is forgotten, the quality remains (a famous quote from a famous french movie Les Tontons flingueurs) :-)
The "foot-cord" might help to stabilize for sub- 1 second shots, but I'm looking for something to use at night-time, with 8-30 second exposures. Thanks for the thought, though.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-19-2012   #13
TheFlyingCamera
Registered User
 
TheFlyingCamera is offline
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 81
Quote:
Originally Posted by crispy12 View Post
+1 from me too. I have two models, but I like the smallest compact version called the T-005. It's aluminium and actually fits in my Domke F2, and almost fits in my Domke F3/Billingham Hadley (top sticks out by an inch). Much more stable than a 'foot cord' and works very well for smaller cameras. I got mine for about $100.

The other model I have is the T1204X. Much sturdier but more pricey and larger as well. Link here. I got it on sale at about $170.

Here's a photo of the T005 for scale. Haven't read much about this brand online but I'm a huge fan. The tripod mount is arca swiss so you can easily get multiple base plates.
Do you actually use the Speed Graphic with the Sirui? or is that just for scale in the photo?
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-19-2012   #14
laurentb
Registered User
 
laurentb is offline
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFlyingCamera View Post
The "foot-cord" might help to stabilize for sub- 1 second shots, but I'm looking for something to use at night-time, with 8-30 second exposures. Thanks for the thought, though.
I used the table top tripod for 30 sec to 1 minute without problems (other than finding the support if I did not want to photograph from the ground)
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-19-2012   #15
Matus
Registered User
 
Matus's Avatar
 
Matus is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Frankfurt, DE
Posts: 1,814
For a really compact (small) but very rigid tripod that is actually very usable with TLR I recommend the Manfrotto 709b. It is indeed a table-top tripod, but it is made entirely from metal and is very strong and stable as the legs spread wide. I carry it everywhere with my TLR.
__________________
________
Matus
... Flickr galleries: New Zealand , Spain
... per camera: Olympus XA , Jupiter J3 , Rolleiflex T, Mamiya 6, Ricoh GRDIII shots
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-19-2012   #16
mfogiel
Registered User
 
mfogiel's Avatar
 
mfogiel is offline
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Monaco
Posts: 2,644
I haven't got a french anectote at hand, but I also recommend the Gitzo traveller carbon - look if you find it second hand. No matter how much you will fool yourself, carbon tripods are the only ones that break the rule, that a light tripod is useless. In case of the Rollei, with the Rolleifix, the camera is easy to mount, and the weight is very well centered above the head of the tripod, moreover, if you are using the classic WLF, you do not need the tripod to be very high.
__________________
MY PORTFOLIOS


WTB: TAKUMAR 58/2.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-19-2012   #17
Matus
Registered User
 
Matus's Avatar
 
Matus is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Frankfurt, DE
Posts: 1,814
If you are looking for 'real tripod' that is just light - check out the Tournament model from Feisol (CT-3442). It weights 1.03 kg and it is capable of supporting lightweight 4x5" camera with ease. I added a Photo Clamm ballhead (I have the PC-36) which is very light, capable and reasonably priced. I got mine from reallybigcameras.com and Kerry was very helpful when choosing the right model. I do not doubt that Gitzo tripods are better made, but my Feisol serves me well for about 4 years and shows no signs of use (I do not use it daily though)

I too wish there was even smaller/lighter carbon tripod for TLR as it does not need to be tall because of top viewing and it does not need to support much weight, or damp mirror/shutter vibrations as there aren't any.
__________________
________
Matus
... Flickr galleries: New Zealand , Spain
... per camera: Olympus XA , Jupiter J3 , Rolleiflex T, Mamiya 6, Ricoh GRDIII shots
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-20-2012   #18
peter_n
~
 
peter_n's Avatar
 
peter_n is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 9,130
I used a Gitzo 1541T with my Rolleiflex but have since sold it after buying a Benro C2680T for much less. The Benro is half the price but actually a better tripod than the Gitzo; details here. I'm now in the third year of use with the Benro and it's holding up well.

In general the best and most expensive tripods are made by RRS and Gitzo, but the Chinese Benro and Taiwanese Feisol brands have made significant progress in the last few years. If you're looking for stable support at a very competitive price they are hard to beat.


__________________
_
~Peter

My RFF Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-20-2012   #19
Beemermark
Registered User
 
Beemermark's Avatar
 
Beemermark is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,176
My recommendation is the Gitzo. Small, very stable. I've used my even with my 4x5 when I used to backpack. I bought mine 30+ years ago (used) and it's done well.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-23-2012   #20
crispy12
Registered User
 
crispy12's Avatar
 
crispy12 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 258
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFlyingCamera View Post
Do you actually use the Speed Graphic with the Sirui? or is that just for scale in the photo?
Yes I do, most of my shots are under 1 sec so it is more than sufficient. The ballhead can get a bit finicky at times. If i'm going to somewhere very windy then I might consider a more sturdy tripod.
__________________
flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-23-2012   #21
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 18,253
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfogiel View Post
I haven't got a french anectote at hand, but I also recommend the Gitzo traveller carbon - look if you find it second hand. No matter how much you will fool yourself, carbon tripods are the only ones that break the rule, that a light tripod is useless. In case of the Rollei, with the Rolleifix, the camera is easy to mount, and the weight is very well centered above the head of the tripod, moreover, if you are using the classic WLF, you do not need the tripod to be very high.
Not entirely true. If you don't mind light and bulky, you can get very stable lightweight tripods. I have an MPP with 'crutch'-style legs (wood above, light alloy below) and no centre post. It weighs a kilo (2.2 lb), and it supports any reasonable 4x5 inch camera easily, though a full-house Gandolfi Variant Level 3 is right at the limit.

The drawback is that it's about 33 inches/84cm long when collapsed and 54 inches/137cm high fully extended. All figures (weight, length collapsed, height) exclude whatever head I choose to put on it.

Oh: and it cost me a tenner, call it $15, in the 1980s. That was complete with head. It was probably made in the late 1950s or early 1960s.

Cheers,

R.
__________________
Now even more free photography information on www.rogerandfrances.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-23-2012   #22
kanzlr
Hexaneur
 
kanzlr's Avatar
 
kanzlr is offline
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vienna (Austria)
Age: 32
Posts: 803
that. I have a pretty light Gitzo GT1830 Basalt. Not the lightest, not the most compact, but it IS light and stable
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-23-2012   #23
TheFlyingCamera
Registered User
 
TheFlyingCamera is offline
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 81
Thanks for the suggestions folks - right now anything Gitzo is out of my budget unless I manage to find a used one that someone inherited and doesn't know what they've got (I should start trolling Craigslist more zealously). The Sirui looks promising - I want something I can attach to my bag and carry without it sticking out past the ends of the bag.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-23-2012   #24
crispy12
Registered User
 
crispy12's Avatar
 
crispy12 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 258
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFlyingCamera View Post
Thanks for the suggestions folks - right now anything Gitzo is out of my budget unless I manage to find a used one that someone inherited and doesn't know what they've got (I should start trolling Craigslist more zealously). The Sirui looks promising - I want something I can attach to my bag and carry without it sticking out past the ends of the bag.
It's worth finding a store that sells it locally to compare between the models. The mid range models are very stable, but the one I linked in the picture might not be the most stable tripod ever,if you use something like a full frame DSLR with 70-200mm lens on a very windy day using a 1 minute exposure.

However for a similar size, the only other alternatives I could find is the crappy Gorillapods or assorted table top tripods so it was definitely very attractive as a travel tripod.
__________________
flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-23-2012   #25
maddoc
... likes film.
 
maddoc's Avatar
 
maddoc is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 調布市
Age: 47
Posts: 6,466
EDIT: I just found the info in your flickr !

Sorry for hijacking the thread ... but I am looking for a bag that could be used to carry my Technica IV + some holders and a small tripod.... Is yours the Domke F2 in the photo ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by crispy12 View Post
+1 from me too. I have two models, but I like the smallest compact version called the T-005. It's aluminium and actually fits in my Domke F2, and almost fits in my Domke F3/Billingham Hadley (top sticks out by an inch). Much more stable than a 'foot cord' and works very well for smaller cameras. I got mine for about $100.

The other model I have is the T1204X. Much sturdier but more pricey and larger as well. Link here. I got it on sale at about $170.

Here's a photo of the T005 for scale. Haven't read much about this brand online but I'm a huge fan. The tripod mount is arca swiss so you can easily get multiple base plates.
__________________
- Gabor

flickr
pBase
blog
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:55.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.