Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Photography General Interest

Photography General Interest Neat Photo stuff NOT particularly about Rangefinders.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 10-02-2012   #51
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,928
This is directly from the top:

"The new procedure is that we send out the film to Fuji and the prints are then sent thru the PICS unit in the lab. There are no negatives anymore. The customer receives a archive disk instead and of course the prints."

I asked them to consider a change in pricing and to keep the 120 services.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-02-2012   #52
photomoof
Moderator w/ Power Cosmic
 
photomoof's Avatar
 
photomoof is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by ray*j*gun View Post
I am awaiting the results for my 120 test roll. I'll post the info when i get the call that its back to the Springfield store.

Again, the reason I posted this thread was to alert the members who use Walmart, since I have been reading for years about their use. Whether you agree with their business model or not I think the members should know that using them may risk their original photo documentation.
Your post is important, there is no reason to develop or shoot film, if there are no negatives to archive. Walmart is currently a total unknown, your precious negatives could be destroyed without warning it seems.

I would wait for an official statement from them, but sadly there is nothihg online about film processing, it is all digital.
__________________
my posts have an expiration date - read 'em quick!

"Conformity or rebellion? Neither one. Both ways are simple-minded - they are only for people who cannot cope with contradiction and ambiguity.”
― The Diamond Age
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-02-2012   #53
ray*j*gun
Registered User
 
ray*j*gun's Avatar
 
ray*j*gun is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Philadelphia area
Posts: 1,594
Thanks photomoff, that's the point of the post.

I spoke to Fuji customer svc and they said just what Raid said. They claimed that the envelope states that but I had used the old envelopes and they did not state that negs were destroyed. I told them I thought that was not legal but was sort of laughed at. What a train wreck. Walmart & Fuji getting too big for their britches.
__________________
Raymond
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-02-2012   #54
kmallick
Registered User
 
kmallick is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 527
I used to use Walmart religiously for 120 roll film processing. The prints and negatives for $2 a pop for a 120 roll was an amazing deal. But since they changed their pricing of print service, reduced the pickup frequency and increased the turnaround time I have been really unhappy. I also experience numerous goof ups with final billing prices for developing + printing. Then I hear that they are no longer returning the negatives (although you may request etc etc)....................

For the price and anguish of driving down to the Walmart, filling in the envelope and dodging the interesting crowd there, I have settled for developing C41 myself with the Unicolor kit. I am much happy to see the entire process from start to end.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-02-2012   #55
I Love Film
-
 
I Love Film is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 562
Why don't you people just send your film to Clark and York labs?

Both are owned by District Photo, and both are dirt cheap and fast. You can download free mailers. They have the most modern equipment in the country.

http://www.clarkcolor.com/Content.as...e-be3618a22533

http://www.yorkphoto.com/Content.asp...+Mailing+Label
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-04-2012   #56
photomoof
Moderator w/ Power Cosmic
 
photomoof's Avatar
 
photomoof is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by I Love Film View Post
Why don't you people just send your film to Clark and York labs?

Both are owned by District Photo, and both are dirt cheap and fast. You can download free mailers. They have the most modern equipment in the country.
I still use a total pro lab in NYC, Duggal.

I have never shopped in a Walmart, but I admit to sometimes using CVS.

I expect to get my negatives back, from my point of view, Walmart's committing outright theft.
__________________
my posts have an expiration date - read 'em quick!

"Conformity or rebellion? Neither one. Both ways are simple-minded - they are only for people who cannot cope with contradiction and ambiguity.”
― The Diamond Age
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-04-2012   #57
kmallick
Registered User
 
kmallick is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 527
Quote:
Originally Posted by I Love Film View Post
Why don't you people just send your film to Clark and York labs?

Both are owned by District Photo, and both are dirt cheap and fast. You can download free mailers. They have the most modern equipment in the country.

http://www.clarkcolor.com/Content.as...e-be3618a22533

http://www.yorkphoto.com/Content.asp...+Mailing+Label
because they don't do 120 or 220 roll films.
I have used them in the past for 35mm and I won't mind trying them again since it seems they have revamped their operation.

Plus, Walmart was the cheapest deal around for processing of 120/220 roll films. Now that they stopped sending negatives back, its a deal killer.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-04-2012   #58
bean_counter
Registered User
 
bean_counter's Avatar
 
bean_counter is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Chicago 'burbs
Posts: 324
I usually used Walmart. It was a convenient drop-off for Dwayne's Kodachrome, on the way to/from work, and the little bit of snapshot color print I did was fine there. Important rolls went to Ritz, out of the way but pretty good here.

Now that my color is Ektar, I haven't settled on a lab. Local Walgreens/CVS are so-so (and likely not around for long), Ritz is closing, no pro lab within 45 minutes each way. Going to have to go mail order, I suppose.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-07-2012   #59
ray*j*gun
Registered User
 
ray*j*gun's Avatar
 
ray*j*gun is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Philadelphia area
Posts: 1,594
My final Walmart post.........I received a call from the local Walmart regarding the 120 chromes I shot as a test and I must say that as badly as the 35 experiment went thats how good the 120 work was done. For $4.88 the film was sent to Fuji developed very well and returned to the Walmart for pick up. The film was clearly handled well and there was no dust etc. The trick is to annotate the envelope properly and the results were excellent.

So, to sum up no good for 35mm (they keep the negs) very good for MF stuff at least based on this one roll.
__________________
Raymond
  Reply With Quote

Local wallmart switch
Old 10-09-2012   #60
mikedlt
Registered User
 
mikedlt is offline
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1
Local wallmart switch

Basically it boils down to this: My local wallmart changed their envelope in the last few weeks. Even if you submit C-41 35mm and check "special processing" and underline "PLEASE RETURN NEGATIVES UNCUT" They will still send you a photo CD, and keep your negatives. However, they don't change the fine print on the envelope - so, I got free processing and free film. This is obviously some MBA's idea to save shipping costs. Wallmart is blaming the whole thing on Fuji America, giving credit to Fuji as it was "their idea" according to the photo manager.

My advice: If you want to take chances, go to Wall Mart. They have scratched an entire roll of 35mm C-41 on me before. If you don't feel like playing chicken with your processor, go to a pro lab. Wallmart developed and mount 36-38 E-6 35mm slides beautifully on several occasions (in the old envelopes, very recently) - and at $6.88 that is a deal, but do you feel lucky? They might decide to send you a photo CD and 4x6 prints instead !
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-09-2012   #61
kmallick
Registered User
 
kmallick is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 527
Quote:
Originally Posted by ray*j*gun View Post
My final Walmart post.........I received a call from the local Walmart regarding the 120 chromes I shot as a test and I must say that as badly as the 35 experiment went thats how good the 120 work was done. For $4.88 the film was sent to Fuji developed very well and returned to the Walmart for pick up. The film was clearly handled well and there was no dust etc. The trick is to annotate the envelope properly and the results were excellent.

So, to sum up no good for 35mm (they keep the negs) very good for MF stuff at least based on this one roll.
ok, thats good for E-6 processing of 120/220. How about C41 processing of 120/220, are they returning the negatives or not?
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-09-2012   #62
hlpgtf
Registered User
 
hlpgtf is offline
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 41
I have to say that I got great photo service from our local walmart for many years (they had some great employees who knew what they were doing). Of course, the last roll I had developed there was probably done in about 2005 or so...
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-09-2012   #63
charjohncarter
Registered User
 
charjohncarter's Avatar
 
charjohncarter is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Danville, CA, USA
Posts: 5,921
I guess it is confusing, but thanks ray*j*gun for this thread. Lots of concerns addressed, and some answered.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 20:14.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.