Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Rangefinder Photography Discussion

Rangefinder Photography Discussion General discussions about Rangefinder Photography. This is a great place for questions and answers that are not addressed in a specific category. Take note there is also a General Photography forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

CANON 5dmk2 converted to Leica M!!!!
Old 10-03-2012   #1
rastas
Photographer, California
 
rastas is offline
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 7
CANON 5dmk2 converted to Leica M!!!!

Who needs a Leica M? I modified the Canon 5dmk2 (disassembled it, modified mirrorbox, etc) to take Leica M lenses. If interested in this type of conversion, contact me. robert@robertbenson.com

The attached images were shot today with the 50mm f1 noctilux on my canon 5dmk2.

Five frames per second, focus peaking, clean images at iso 2000, live view, video, etc..... specs that are better than the M9 or M.

RAW FILES CAN BE DOWNLOADED HERE: http://robertbenson.photoshelter.com...000X.WhganwKgE (password: download)
For more information on conversion, visit www.dslrwirelessmonitors.com
Attached Images
File Type: jpg upload_32.jpg (24.7 KB, 353 views)
File Type: jpg upload_40.jpg (29.8 KB, 304 views)
File Type: jpg upload_44.jpg (18.4 KB, 300 views)
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-03-2012   #2
Joosep
Registered User
 
Joosep is offline
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tallinn, Estonia
Posts: 284
Now put it in a Leica M body.
__________________
click here for my babies
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-03-2012   #3
jtm6
Registered User
 
jtm6 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 277
Sounds like a cool project! How did you reposition the new mount?
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-03-2012   #4
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
 
rxmd's Avatar
 
rxmd is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kyrgyzstan
Posts: 6,043
Focusing is done using LiveView, I presume? If you use something like Magic Lantern, you even get focus peaking and the usual perks.

Do you have photos of the final thing?
__________________
Bing! You're hypnotized!
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-03-2012   #5
maddoc
... likes film.
 
maddoc's Avatar
 
maddoc is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 調布市
Age: 47
Posts: 6,467
Very interesting ! Now I also would like to see some images taken with wide-angle lenses since the Canon sensor does not have the micro lenses on the sensor.
__________________
- Gabor

flickr
pBase
blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-03-2012   #6
gavinlg
Registered User
 
gavinlg's Avatar
 
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,395
Pretty clever - putting the best lenses in front of one of the best sensors.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-04-2012   #7
denizg7
Dennis Van Patten
 
denizg7 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: New York , New York
Posts: 752
if someone could put a 5d mark 3 sensor into a analogue m body and take m lenses i would like
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-04-2012   #8
Lss
Registered User
 
Lss is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,071
This has been done a few times, I think the first I saw was on a Canon 5D (which was pretty pointless since there was no live view, but cool modification anyway).

Anyone who wants a rangefinder still needs an M, though.
__________________
Lasse
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-04-2012   #9
JHP
Registered User
 
JHP is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 331
Awesome.
__________________
MY BLOG
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-04-2012   #10
Griffin
Grampa's cameras user
 
Griffin's Avatar
 
Griffin is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Rotterdam
Posts: 429
Am too very curious what this setup looks like!
__________________
flickr
  Reply With Quote

5dmk2 mod
Old 10-04-2012   #11
rastas
Photographer, California
 
rastas is offline
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 7
5dmk2 mod

I modified the 5dmk2, not the 5d. (And that sensor does have microlenses). I focus right off the sensor, using liveview. I have a hoodman type scope on the lcd so its held right up to my eye. Shooting is quick and easy and pleasant.

I will post pictures of the camera later today. The entire front part of the camera has been cut away.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-04-2012   #12
lam
Dave
 
lam's Avatar
 
lam is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 610
Very cool.
__________________
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-04-2012   #13
brbo
Registered User
 
brbo's Avatar
 
brbo is offline
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 280
Quote:
Originally Posted by rastas View Post
I modified the 5dmk2, not the 5d. (And that sensor does have microlenses).
Which sensor does not have microlenses?
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-04-2012   #14
gavinlg
Registered User
 
gavinlg's Avatar
 
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,395
All sensors have microlenses.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-04-2012   #15
Jamie123
Registered User
 
Jamie123 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,714
Quote:
Originally Posted by brbo View Post
Which sensor does not have microlenses?
Maybe one that works for the FCC?
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-04-2012   #16
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,729
Such conversions are very cool indeed.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-04-2012   #17
gb hill
Registered User
 
gb hill's Avatar
 
gb hill is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North Carolina
Age: 53
Posts: 5,020
Quote:
Originally Posted by gavinlg View Post
Pretty clever - putting the best lenses in front of one of the best sensors.
Why not just buy some Canon L glass. I doubt Leica M lenses on the 5d mkII are any better than Canon L lenses.
__________________
flickr
Blog
ipernity
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-04-2012   #18
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
 
rxmd's Avatar
 
rxmd is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kyrgyzstan
Posts: 6,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by gb hill View Post
Why not just buy some Canon L glass. I doubt Leica M lenses on the 5d mkII are any better than Canon L lenses.
That way he would end up having to buy new L lenses that are, as everybody knows, good, big and expensive. This way he can use his existing lenses that are good, small, and already paid for.

Case in point: he seems to have a Noctilux already, now buying another Canon 50/f1 L lens would be pretty expensive and it'd be a huge chunk of glass.
__________________
Bing! You're hypnotized!
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-04-2012   #19
f16sunshine
Like boots in the dryer..
 
f16sunshine's Avatar
 
f16sunshine is online now
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 3,106
Hello Robert
Welcome to the forum!
Very interesting work around you have created. I'm tuned in to learn more.
Do you have more images on flicker or elsewhere from this set up.
The native image posting size here on the board is quite small. It would be nice to see larger images.

Cheers!
__________________
Andy
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-04-2012   #20
gb hill
Registered User
 
gb hill's Avatar
 
gb hill is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North Carolina
Age: 53
Posts: 5,020
Quote:
Originally Posted by rxmd View Post
That way he would end up having to buy new L lenses that are, as everybody knows, good, big and expensive. This way he can use his existing lenses that are good, small, and already paid for.

Case in point: he seems to have a Noctilux already, now buying another Canon 50/f1 L lens would be pretty expensive and it'd be a huge chunk of glass.
Good Point. They aren't cheap.
__________________
flickr
Blog
ipernity
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-04-2012   #21
funkydog
Registered User
 
funkydog is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 341
Interesting! So how'd you do it or is that going to be a trade secret? Saw off the mirrorbox? Before there were mirrorless M4/3 cameras, I opened up a Canon Rebel body to see if I could mod it to mount M lenses. No go. The mirror box is the skeleton of that body and the shutter wouldn't fire when the mirror was disengaged and flipped up.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-04-2012   #22
loneranger
Registered User
 
loneranger is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 412
Now if someone could hack off the bulky mirror box and put a nice mechanical rangefinder in there, maybe one taken from a cheap 70's point and shoot, then I'm in.
__________________
Fuji SW 690, canon 7, konica 35 uc hex, canon 28/3.5ltm, canon 28/2.8 ltm, olympus pen ft, pany g1
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-04-2012   #23
nonot
Registered User
 
nonot is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Canada
Age: 33
Posts: 259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lss View Post
Anyone who wants a rangefinder still needs an M, though.
You're right, a Mamiya 6.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-04-2012   #24
mbisc
Silver Halide User
 
mbisc's Avatar
 
mbisc is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 375
Am I the only one bothered by the significant vignetting on the three sample photos? I wonder if that's some kind of mechanical vignetting, since I doubt that the Noctilux woudl do that?
__________________
Mike

----------------------------------------------------------------
lots of LF, MF & 35mm stuff
oh yeah, and a digital p&s for my digital stuff
----------------------------------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-04-2012   #25
f16sunshine
Like boots in the dryer..
 
f16sunshine's Avatar
 
f16sunshine is online now
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 3,106
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbisc View Post
Am I the only one bothered by the significant vignetting on the three sample photos? I wonder if that's some kind of mechanical vignetting, since I doubt that the Noctilux woudl do that?

Noct f1 vignettes significantly at wide open.

Here is Flickriver. Scroll down until you find some wo samples on m9 from "ming" or others.
http://www.flickriver.com/search/leica+noctilux+f1/
__________________
Andy
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 13:20.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.