Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Rangefinder Photography Discussion

Rangefinder Photography Discussion General discussions about Rangefinder Photography. This is a great place for questions and answers that are not addressed in a specific category. Take note there is also a General Photography forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Hasselblad 120 film back
Old 08-23-2012   #1
vegas
Registered User
 
vegas is offline
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 12
Question Hasselblad 120 film back

Hi guys, im wandering if is possible to load a 220 film in a 120 hasselblad film back and get nice results. has anybody tried..? maybe is not possible cos the plate is too tight, but ive noticed that tha back film holder is the same dimension. could anybody help me here. Thaks a lot
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-23-2012   #2
sahe69
Registered User
 
sahe69's Avatar
 
sahe69 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 445
Nope, it's not possible. The counter goes only up to 12 pics and will stop advancing after that. I suppose there could be also some (other) mechanical limitations.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-23-2012   #3
bigeye
Registered User
 
bigeye's Avatar
 
bigeye is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 1,147
Yes, the A12 mechanically stops at 12.

You can shoot 120 in a 220 back (A24), though (11 frames; remember to stop @ "12").

- Charlie
__________________
Anything that is very simple is apt to be sloppy. - Elliott Erwitt

I bought a new camera. It's so advanced you don't even need it. - Steven Wright
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-23-2012   #4
sevo
Fokutorendaburando
 
sevo is online now
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 3,806
The pressure plate would a bit too far back and slightly loose, so expect some loss of sharpness. At least theoretically - in practice most medium format lenses have a aperture sweet spot somewhere between 8 and 16, which would amply cover that slight focal error in DOF. More relevant is that you will only get 12 exposures, with a bit of margin overlap in some of the frames, and might be unable to fully unload it after the 12th exposure, short of opening it in a darkroom/dark bag (if you decide to try it, do not force anything).
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-23-2012   #5
vegas
Registered User
 
vegas is offline
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 12
Hello guys, yes, i see i didnt think bout the 12 frames counter, of course it wouldnt work. is just that wanted to save the money buying a new back thats all. Thanks a lot guys.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-23-2012   #6
Dwig
Registered User
 
Dwig's Avatar
 
Dwig is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Key West, FL, USA
Posts: 583
Actually, it is/was possible to shoot 220 in the original style "12" backs, though not so with the "modern" (last 1/2 century) "A12" backs.

The method was a bit unreliable and involved careful loading, winding a "magic" number of turns to the first frame, reseting the counter then as normal and then resetting the counter again when you get to frame 12. You also had to insert a black plug into the hole behind the film reminder dial where you normally viewed the appearance of the "1" on the paper while loading. When done correctly you got 23 exposures on the roll. There were, I presume, some minor issues with film flatness as the pressure plate would leave an overly wide channel for the film.
__________________
----------
Dwig
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-23-2012   #7
bananasplit
Registered User
 
bananasplit is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 65
Honestly you could but why would you do that?
A12 back fitted with 220 will allow you to shoot only 12 views out of 24. You may not want to wast half of your film.
You should go for a second hand A24 back. KEH has some for cheap...

Now concerning the lost of sharpness as mentioned earlier it is theoretical. As is also theoretical the lost of sharpness while using 120 film with A24 back. I experienced this and never found any lost. But its my personal experience.

Enjoy experiencing and let us know.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-28-2012   #8
scottwyden
Registered User
 
scottwyden is offline
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 4
This thread makes me miss my Hassy :/
__________________
New Jersey Photographer
Gear: Leica M9, Summicron 50mm f/2, Zeiss 25mm f/2.8
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-28-2012   #9
Jamie123
Registered User
 
Jamie123 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,712
Quote:
Originally Posted by vegas View Post
Hello guys, yes, i see i didnt think bout the 12 frames counter, of course it wouldnt work. is just that wanted to save the money buying a new back thats all. Thanks a lot guys.
Don't pay a lot of money for an A24 back. Hardly anybody wants them these days so they can be found for very little money. KEH has one for sale for $14 right now.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-28-2012   #10
Nokton48
Registered User
 
Nokton48's Avatar
 
Nokton48 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 2,493
I guess I am an "hardly anybody". I have a deep freeze with a pretty decent amount of 220 film which I have stocked up on. And I own seven perfectly functional A24's.

You will need an (original) "Model 12" back, not the A12. It has a key on the side that can reset the film counter, after the first 12. You might lose the last frame, I wouldn't count on it. Model 12's are dirt cheap.

They also made a "rubber plug" for the Model 12, to use with 220. I have a few of them around. But alternatively, you can cover the "flip-down "cover" with black electrical tape, especially if you are not doing alot of this. Works fine.
__________________
Sony Nex-3's/Minolta SRT's/SRM's & XK/Hasselblad's/Plaubel Makiflexes/Sinar Norma's

http://www.flickr.com/groups/656147@N20/pool/
http://www.project-double-x.org/
Some of my older pix: http://www.flickr.com/photos/18134483@N04/3011042809/

L@@king For: 1) The Minolta SR-M 250 Exposure Film Back. 2) The Minolta SR-M Film Loader for 250 Exposure Cartridges. 3) The SR-M Battery Test Lamp. 4) The Minolta Intervalometer PM. 5) The Minolta Intervalometer S.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-28-2012   #11
Jamie123
Registered User
 
Jamie123 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,712
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nokton48 View Post
I guess I am an "hardly anybody". I have a deep freeze with a pretty decent amount of 220 film which I have stocked up on. And I own seven perfectly functional A24's.

You will need an (original) "Model 12" back, not the A12. It has a key on the side that can reset the film counter, after the first 12. You might lose the last frame, I wouldn't count on it. Model 12's are dirt cheap.

They also made a "rubber plug" for the Model 12, to use with 220. I have a few of them around. But alternatively, you can cover the "flip-down "cover" with black electrical tape, especially if you are not doing alot of this. Works fine.
I think the reason why hardly anyone uses 220 film anymore is because there's no economic advantage in doing so. 220 film often costs more than twice the price of their 120 counterparts and processing is often also double. Nothing wrong with the film itself, though

I actually think it's even cheaper to buy an A24 back than an old c12 back.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-29-2012   #12
sevo
Fokutorendaburando
 
sevo is online now
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 3,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie123 View Post
Nothing wrong with the film itself, though
... other than that the middle frames frequently receive streaks or scratches in the development, as the film has to be twisted around a frame to fit it into many hanger type processors.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 23:28.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.