Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Rangefinder Photography Discussion

Rangefinder Photography Discussion General discussions about Rangefinder Photography. This is a great place for questions and answers that are not addressed in a specific category. Take note there is also a General Photography forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 07-16-2012   #26
bugmenot
Registered User
 
bugmenot is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 356
Good point about not knowing locations around for photo and film processing.

This really goes back to the remarks many older folks I have met who have seen me shooting film usually make:

"They still make film?"
"You can still buy film?"
"Do you have to process it yourself?"
"I haven't seen a camera with film in it in years. I thought they went extinct and all the film manufacturers are defunct."
"Didn't Kodak go bankrupt?"

As they say, Knowledge is Power.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-16-2012   #27
NLewis
Registered User
 
NLewis is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 187
Developing is moving mostly to mailorder. In the U.S. there are four main processing labs that people seem to use:

North Coast Photo (San Diego). I've had problems here with BW but the rest seems pretty good.

Richard Photo Lab. Somewhat pricey but a quality "pro" job.

Precision Camera. I've had good experiences all around with Precision. Excellent hi-res scanning.

Dwayne's Photo. Not much in the way of hi-res scanning here, but they do a lot of volume with low prices. Quality might be a little lower, but C41 is pretty forgiving. I'm trying them for BW, let's see what happens.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-16-2012   #28
muser53
MUSER53
 
muser53 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Berkeley, CA
Age: 60
Posts: 371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Bellayr View Post
We spend thousands of dollars on top notch film equipment and then send the film to the cheapest developer! It is best to find and develop a professional long term relationship with a professional lab. Yes, it costs a little more but the work is better.
Just what I was thinking---you beat me to it
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-16-2012   #29
Guaranteed
Registered User
 
Guaranteed's Avatar
 
Guaranteed is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 209
Quote:
Originally Posted by anjoca76 View Post
Yes, there are not as many places these days to get C-41 processed, but I have not yet found it too hard here in Boston, either. There is at least one pro lab (Colortek), plus numerous other places, such as CVS, Walgreens, Hunt's, Ritz, to name a few. E6...now that's another story. E6 is getting tougher every day, but there are still numerous C41 options in my neck of the woods.
I've never used them but I've heard good things about Color Services in Needham, they do E-6, C-41, B&W, and Pyro(whatever the hell that is).
__________________
Christian
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-16-2012   #30
Keith
Registered User
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Keith is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 15,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by gavinlg View Post
Here in Melbourne we have quite a few dedicated labs running all day - I can get c41 developed and pick it up within a few hours at BONDS color lab in cremorne. Great consistency too.
There's also a place that's opened up near the Astor theatre that are a dedicated film lab, and theres now a guy that opened up his own home business developing film quite cheap.

But Melbourne is a particularly creative city - it's probably not like that in my old home town of Brisbane, for instance.


Hey ... we're too busy banging up shopping malls and creating ugly new housing developments for that sort of stuff!
__________________
---------------------------
zenfolio
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-16-2012   #31
Aristophanes
Registered User
 
Aristophanes is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 484
Quote:
Originally Posted by bugmenot View Post
Thankfully, where I live, quite a few large chain stores like Walmart, London Drugs, etc. still process C-41 film. There are quite a number of smaller shops that cover C-41 processing as well. I don't think people who shoot C-41 film will have to worry for a long time, at least in Canada.

Sadly, I can find just two shops within a 100km driving radius of my home that still processes E-6 transparencies. ._. Also, only one photo chain that does black and white.
Wal-mart Canada is phasing out film processing. Same for London Drugs and Pharmasave. All of them have scale down and out plans.

I used to work for one of those chains and still keep the contacts. In less than 36 months none of them will process negs.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-16-2012   #32
Aristophanes
Registered User
 
Aristophanes is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 484
Quote:
Originally Posted by NLewis View Post
Developing is moving mostly to mailorder. In the U.S. there are four main processing labs that people seem to use:

North Coast Photo (San Diego). I've had problems here with BW but the rest seems pretty good.

Richard Photo Lab. Somewhat pricey but a quality "pro" job.

Precision Camera. I've had good experiences all around with Precision. Excellent hi-res scanning.

Dwayne's Photo. Not much in the way of hi-res scanning here, but they do a lot of volume with low prices. Quality might be a little lower, but C41 is pretty forgiving. I'm trying them for BW, let's see what happens.
I'd add in:

Indie Film Lab
The Darkroom
120processing.com

There are others.

What's notable about all these services is the primaries of scanning as a core feeaure, whereas the mini-labscanning was a kludge add-on. Printing was/is the main biz.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-16-2012   #33
dschal
Registered User
 
dschal is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guaranteed View Post
I've never used them but I've heard good things about Color Services in Needham, they do E-6, C-41, B&W, and Pyro(whatever the hell that is).
Color Services is good. I used them when I lived in Newton. No worries.
Dave
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-16-2012   #34
bugmenot
Registered User
 
bugmenot is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aristophanes View Post
Wal-mart Canada is phasing out film processing. Same for London Drugs and Pharmasave. All of them have scale down and out plans.

I used to work for one of those chains and still keep the contacts. In less than 36 months none of them will process negs.
Well, that's depressing. London Drugs nearby my home has quite a sophisticated photo lab. It would be a shame to see it disappear.

Any options for in-home C-41 processing? ._.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-16-2012   #35
anjoca76
Registered User
 
anjoca76's Avatar
 
anjoca76 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 446
Quote:
Originally Posted by dschal View Post
Color Services is good. I used them when I lived in Newton. No worries.
Dave
Good to know, thanks!
__________________
Andy

Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-16-2012   #36
muser53
MUSER53
 
muser53 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Berkeley, CA
Age: 60
Posts: 371
I've had good results using:

http://www.lightwavesimaging.com/

http://www.photolaboratory.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-16-2012   #37
v_roma
Registered User
 
v_roma is offline
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 459
+1 for Precision and Indie Film Lab. I typically use Precision and recently tried Indie Film Lab. Precision camera do a great job for a reasonable price. Indie Film Lab was excellent but you pay a premium. I'll be using Precision camera for most of my rolls, I think, and Indie Film Lab for the special ones
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-16-2012   #38
jbot
Jared Krause
 
jbot's Avatar
 
jbot is offline
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Toronto, Canada.
Posts: 151
I'm starting to wonder if it's time to sell my expensive film equipment. Seems like it would still fetch a high price now, but if the labs all disappear, I imagine even the not so cheap rangefinders would drastically drop in price. What do you guys think?
__________________
Flickr Jaredk.ca

Voigtländer Bessa R4A (35mm f/1.4)
Olympus OM-D EM5 (14mm f/2.5, 25mm f/1.4, 45mm f/1.8)
Olympus OM-1 (28mm f/3.5, 50mm f/1.8)
Pentax PC35AF
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-16-2012   #39
farlymac
PF McFarland
 
farlymac is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 2,205
The CVS closest to me has lost my business because they had folks that don't care how they handle the product, and were contantly wrecking the machines, and sometimes my film. You don't pay people minimum wage and expect them to give a hoot about their job.

But then the 'pro' lab about eight miles away doesn't do much better. They have someone there that will actually scuff up the negs for some reason. And they have lowered the scan resolution to about a quarter of what it used to be, just to reduce time spent on the machines. At least they are now stocking a decent choice of film, but I'm even thinking that buying by the brick is the way to go.

PF
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-16-2012   #40
farlymac
PF McFarland
 
farlymac is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 2,205
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbot View Post
I'm starting to wonder if it's time to sell my expensive film equipment. Seems like it would still fetch a high price now, but if the labs all disappear, I imagine even the not so cheap rangefinders would drastically drop in price. What do you guys think?
Yeah, I was thinking about that last night. May be time to let some of my toys go, so someone else can have some fun with them before it's too late.

PF
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-16-2012   #41
Red Robin
It Is What It Is
 
Red Robin's Avatar
 
Red Robin is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wrinkle City, Fla.
Age: 63
Posts: 542
In my town CVS, a drug store, is where I have my processing & scaning done . Went through a lot to find the folks that do it now. But The tech. tells me his hours have been cut and they will drop out in another year or so. The adventure continues. I have been slowly buying things that will start me to begin my own processing. An affordable chemical source (local?), a super scanner of some kind. Not being a Pro it gets hard to justify some of the expense.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-16-2012   #42
dimension2
Registered User
 
dimension2's Avatar
 
dimension2 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Bellayr View Post
We spend thousands of dollars on top notch film equipment and then send the film to the cheapest developer! It is best to find and develop a professional long term relationship with a professional lab. Yes, it costs a little more but the work is better.
I guess I was a little hesitant paying more for the processing than for the film itself. Snapfish was cheap at 3-5 bucks for processing, scans (low res, but still) AND prints. A few scratchy negatives later, I learn quality comes at a price. Still learning.

Thanks for the responses. I learn here there are more labs that take in mail orders than I was aware of. Richard Photo and North Coast were the others I had heard of, but good to know there are quite a few alternatives available, with affordable options. Now to get out and shoot some more..
__________________
On the web -dimension2.in
Also, On Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-17-2012   #43
kuvvy
Registered User
 
kuvvy's Avatar
 
kuvvy is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 56
Posts: 1,215
I heard that here in the UK, Boots the High St pharmacy chain are looking to stop their film processing.
__________________
Fuji X-Pro 1, Fuji X100, Sony RX100, Ricoh GRD IV, Fuji F30, Oly Trip 35, Vivitar UWS.

Flickr gallery

Home Page http://www.wix.com/paulkowalczuk/paulfoto
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-17-2012   #44
mfunnell
Shaken, so blurred
 
mfunnell's Avatar
 
mfunnell is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,842
I'm staying here at Burleigh Heads at the Gold Coast:


burleigh_outlook_2012-1-web

for the first time in a few years. I had a word with Trevor who runs the local photography shop. He put some hard (though anecdotal numbers) on C-41 processing where he is. He's at a major tourist destination and his only real competition (Big W, who try to style themselves on Walmart) stopped all film development earlier this year. Still, he says, three years ago he was processing 25-30 C-41 films per day. Now he counts himself lucky if he gets half a dozen.

He has to charge more than he feels comfortable with, simply to support the cost of the chemicals and maintenance on his machinery (Trevor's a bit of a stickler for quality). For as long as I've known him, Trevor's been talking about shutting up shop, but he hasn't. Partly because of a lack of buyers, but also partly because he does it for love rather than money.

I suspect that once the likes of Trevor retire, well, it's "all over, red rover".

...Mike
__________________
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness." Dave Barry

My RFF top 10(12). My flickr photostream has day-to-day stuff, while dA has some of my better shots.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-17-2012   #45
ebolton
Self Propelled
 
ebolton's Avatar
 
ebolton is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Hampshire, USA
Age: 55
Posts: 319
I'm shooting a few rolls of Tri-X now, and with the help of Chris Crawford's tech pages and a few other sources, re-aquiring the skills to soup it myself. This is basically a step toward processing C-41 myself, since I really see and prefer the world in color. Thanks to my professional life,I have an account at Automation Direct and have just ordered the parts I'll need to make a temp controlled water bath. There are still a few places around here for C-41, but they are getting scarcer and the quality has been slipping for all of them.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-17-2012   #46
goamules
Registered User
 
goamules is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 577
I keep saying 35mm film is not worth it except I love the old, quality rangefinder cameras! I do shoot a lot of Large Format black and white, and Wetplate, which are totally worth it, nothing else like them. But when I screw an old 50s RF lens on my G1 m4/3 and get great color and exposure every shot, it's disappointing to pay $10 for a roll an find a lot of flaws. Again, I shoot a roll or two every month for the fun of using the camera. Not the fun of getting it developed.
__________________
Garrett

My Flickr Photos
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-17-2012   #47
jwicaksana
Jakarta, Indonesia
 
jwicaksana is offline
Join Date: Apr 2012
Age: 25
Posts: 267
Quote:
Originally Posted by goamules View Post
I keep saying 35mm film is not worth it except I love the old, quality rangefinder cameras! I do shoot a lot of Large Format black and white, and Wetplate, which are totally worth it, nothing else like them. But when I screw an old 50s RF lens on my G1 m4/3 and get great color and exposure every shot, it's disappointing to pay $10 for a roll an find a lot of flaws. Again, I shoot a roll or two every month for the fun of using the camera. Not the fun of getting it developed.
I am beginning to feel like this too
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-17-2012   #48
clayne
shoot film or die
 
clayne is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA | Kuching, MY | Jakarta, ID
Posts: 456
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aristophanes View Post
Wal-mart Canada is phasing out film processing. Same for London Drugs and Pharmasave. All of them have scale down and out plans.

I used to work for one of those chains and still keep the contacts. In less than 36 months none of them will process negs.
I thought you were done with the doom and gloom? What's wrong? Get run off APUG and have to find a new outlet?
__________________
Flickr | Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2012   #49
Aristophanes
Registered User
 
Aristophanes is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 484
Quote:
Originally Posted by clayne View Post
I thought you were done with the doom and gloom? What's wrong? Get run off APUG and have to find a new outlet?
For being right?

Labs are closing all over. That's what's being heard anecdotally in this thread and others. Almost all major pharma chains (my old corporate stomping grounds) have plans or are in the process of eliminating film processing services both in-house and send out. Film consumption is still on a very steep decline.

People need to be aware that if they are long-term counting on inexpensive, local film processing, those days are very close to being at an end. A few dense urban areas may have some volume to keep it going, but for the most part, we're looking at C41 mail order at $10+/roll, prints extra. Get used to it.

Fuji has stopped all new manufacture of lab and RA equipment. Same for Noritsu. Their sales teams (who I used to work with) only sell and service dry print systems, with processing labs relegated to service and salvage ops. Even RA printing in North America (and I've been told, Japan) is on the rocks.

Sorry. That's just the truth of it.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2012   #50
Nikon Bob
camera hunter & gatherer
 
Nikon Bob's Avatar
 
Nikon Bob is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aristophanes View Post
For being right?

Labs are closing all over. That's what's being heard anecdotally in this thread and others. Almost all major pharma chains (my old corporate stomping grounds) have plans or are in the process of eliminating film processing services both in-house and send out. Film consumption is still on a very steep decline.

People need to be aware that if they are long-term counting on inexpensive, local film processing, those days are very close to being at an end. A few dense urban areas may have some volume to keep it going, but for the most part, we're looking at C41 mail order at $10+/roll, prints extra. Get used to it.

Fuji has stopped all new manufacture of lab and RA equipment. Same for Noritsu. Their sales teams (who I used to work with) only sell and service dry print systems, with processing labs relegated to service and salvage ops. Even RA printing in North America (and I've been told, Japan) is on the rocks.

Sorry. That's just the truth of it.
That pretty well sums up what I am seeing locally and in this thread and others. The few exceptions being posted are indeed in high density urban areas for the rest of us it is a different story. Reality sucks and burying your head in the sand won't make it go away and neither will getting upset at those that don't bury their head in the sand. I don't doubt that APUG hostile to that train of thought. I don't think film will disappear but just get more difficult to find and get processed which will go hand in hand with much higher associated costs.

Bob
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=557'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:29.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.