Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > Point-N-Shoot

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 05-27-2012   #26
foto_mike
Registered User
 
foto_mike's Avatar
 
foto_mike is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matus View Post
I should maybe start another thread, but I do not want to spam the forum category with my treads.

So - film is inside the camera, seems loaded fine. The camera focuses and meters (in A mode I get the selected shutter speed on the LCD) - but when I push the shutter fully - the camera does not take a shot! Simply nothing happens. I am in M mode as I am trying to shoot in darkness over few previously exposed frames on the film. Just the underexposure sign (the 'minus') blinks together with green light for focus confirmation.

Is there a chance I am doing something wrong - or is the camera suffering the 'shutter trigger' problem?
Almost certainly you have the infamous shutter release problem. Easily fixed following this procedure.
  Reply With Quote

are you sure?
Old 05-27-2012   #27
ampguy
Registered User
 
ampguy's Avatar
 
ampguy is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,935
are you sure?

check the lcd indicator. If you have a good one, unlike some of the ones probably out there that may be worn, you won't hear or feel a thing, so chances are you may be taking great photos.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matus View Post
I should maybe start another thread, but I do not want to spam the forum category with my treads.

So - film is inside the camera, seems loaded fine. The camera focuses and meters (in A mode I get the selected shutter speed on the LCD) - but when I push the shutter fully - the camera does not take a shot! Simply nothing happens. I am in M mode as I am trying to shoot in darkness over few previously exposed frames on the film. Just the underexposure sign (the 'minus') blinks together with green light for focus confirmation.

Is there a chance I am doing something wrong - or is the camera suffering the 'shutter trigger' problem?
__________________
My photo blog

  Reply With Quote

Old 05-27-2012   #28
Matus
Registered User
 
Matus's Avatar
 
Matus is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Frankfurt, DE
Posts: 1,814
Thanks. I have checked on the LCD - after several attempts it still shows that the camera is on the 1st shot - so no shots taken (and I was trying it in complete silence - I would have heard that)

So it seems that the camera has the infamous problem. For me it means that I will send it back (have a return warranty). I have read the procedure how to repair it (I am already subscribed to that thread ), but I see no point in taking the risk - I payed bit over 300 € for the thing, I expect it to work.

I will play with the camera a bit more (get the film out) and re-thing whether I want to get another one or not.

Thank you again.
__________________
________
Matus
... Flickr galleries: New Zealand , Spain
... per camera: Olympus XA , Jupiter J3 , Rolleiflex T, Mamiya 6, Ricoh GRDIII shots
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-28-2012   #29
btgc
Registered User
 
btgc's Avatar
 
btgc is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matus View Post
So it seems that the camera has the infamous problem. For me it means that I will send it back (have a return warranty). I have read the procedure how to repair it (I am already subscribed to that thread ), but I see no point in taking the risk - I payed bit over 300 € for the thing, I expect it to work.
Have you considered doing this repair yourself, after communicating partial refund with seller? After all, particular model suffers from this issue and sooner or later you could meet it. Imagine camera starting to act up three months after deal? Seller has a feeling deal is done, while you still feel warmth from your cash in hand.
__________________
MyFlickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-28-2012   #30
Matus
Registered User
 
Matus's Avatar
 
Matus is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Frankfurt, DE
Posts: 1,814
My original idea when I was buying the camera from this particular seller was that if I do not like the camera (or results) I will simply send it back. If I try to repair it that possibility will be gone (and if I am not lucky the camera too) ...
__________________
________
Matus
... Flickr galleries: New Zealand , Spain
... per camera: Olympus XA , Jupiter J3 , Rolleiflex T, Mamiya 6, Ricoh GRDIII shots
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-28-2012   #31
filmfan
passez le fromage
 
filmfan's Avatar
 
filmfan is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Age: 27
Posts: 4,168
Quote:
Originally Posted by ampguy View Post
and used them with and without filters. The better photos always came without the use of filters. Not all lenses behave equally when a flat piece of glass is placed in front of them with a minimal hood. I carried an ND filter with me, but rarely used it with the HAF. I'd usually just keep a roll of slow film (expired Reala usually) that I set at ISO 50, and a few rolls of Kodachrome 25 when it was still being processed.
Try taking your filter off for a roll and examine the photos. It will give a more natural look. It's like swimming naked
Well... to each, their own I guess. You are allowed to make your opinion public and I am glad you have found something that works for you.
I'm just saying-- I have shot 200-250 rolls through Hexar AF with and without filters and never seen a difference.
__________________
@Web
@Blog
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:35.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.