Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film

Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film Discuss Image processing -- traditional darkoom or digital lightroom here. Notice there are subcategories to narrow down subject matter. .

View Poll Results: How many good frames do you need from a 36 frame roll to be happy?
1 125 23.58%
2 65 12.26%
3 81 15.28%
4 62 11.70%
5 43 8.11%
6+ 154 29.06%
Voters: 530. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

How many shots per roll are you happy with?
Old 09-02-2008   #1
totifoto
Registered User
 
totifoto's Avatar
 
totifoto is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Iceland
Posts: 504
How many shots per roll are you happy with?

If you shoot a 36 frame roll how many frames do you have to get from that roll to be happy?

If I get one that is perfect Im happy but I wanna get at least 5 good frame from a roll.

When I shoot 6X6 I wanna get at least 3.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-02-2008   #2
MickH
Registered User
 
MickH is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 974
Blimey, if I got one in ten rolls that is "perfect" I'd be ecstatic! TBH I don't think I've ever taken a perfect photo, but I think I know what you mean ;-)

Anything above a couple of 'keeper' shots out of a 36 exp film I would regard as a good return.

Cheers.

Last edited by MickH : 09-02-2008 at 14:22. Reason: Spelink
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-02-2008   #3
cjm
Registered User
 
cjm's Avatar
 
cjm is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Diego
Age: 32
Posts: 439
I'm happy if I get at least one photo that I like well enough to have printed. I usually have about 5 that I will upload to my flickr account that are okay.
__________________
Chris M.
Flickr
RFF
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-02-2008   #4
Bob Michaels
nobody special
 
Bob Michaels's Avatar
 
Bob Michaels is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Apopka FL (USA)
Age: 70
Posts: 3,190
I always average a bit under one "winner" per roll. No matter if it is a 36 exposure roll of 35mm or 10 exposure roll of 120.

If my average got higher than that, I would begin to wonder if I am editing tight enough.
__________________
http://www.bobmichaels.org
internet forums appear to have an abundance of anonymous midgets prancing on stilts
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-02-2008   #5
tomasis
Registered User
 
tomasis is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 742
It is Zero for most rolls it is possible to keep up continuing to shoot more rolls. Is it not what we are doing?
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-02-2008   #6
Ron (Netherlands)
Registered User
 
Ron (Netherlands)'s Avatar
 
Ron (Netherlands) is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,725
at least one excellent, if not it is considered pure a test roll (to be forgotten soon)
__________________
__________________
When day is done......

Leica: Urleica, IIa synch conversion, M2, M6 TTL Millenium

My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-02-2008   #7
charjohncarter
Registered User
 
charjohncarter's Avatar
 
charjohncarter is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Danville, CA, USA
Posts: 6,535
I need 3 but if I get even 1 that is a triple A winner I would be happy. The problem is the 1 winner I get is usually not the one I thought it would be, which means I get zero intentional winners.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-02-2008   #8
mabelsound
actually a dude
 
mabelsound's Avatar
 
mabelsound is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 44
Posts: 5,245
5 that I don't want to delete immediately, that's a good roll.

I had a roll once with like ten that I actually LIKED. That was an awesome day!
__________________
photoblog, flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-02-2008   #9
rogue_designer
Reciprocity Failure
 
rogue_designer's Avatar
 
rogue_designer is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Age: 39
Posts: 2,234
I want more the 50% to be ok technically (focus, exposure).

Beyond that there are too many variables. I get alot more "misses" (composition/timing wise) with street since I can't control much. I'd say I want to get 3-5 street shots that I'd be happy with scanning to and showing others, per roll.

If I'm shooting landscape, or architecture (or anything more formal) I end up with a MUCH higher percentage of usable shots.

Likewise, if I'm shooting 120 or large format, the percentage goes way up, since I pre-edit alot of shots before they're taken.

Winners are another matter altogether. But I know for a fact that I have an absurd number of negatives in various formats filed away (from the last 15 years of shooting, pro and personal), and my active portfolio is fewer than 25 images. So - the math is against me.
__________________
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
Usually using: Canon P, Sony Nex 7, Canon 5D MkII, Horseman VHR, Horseman 45LX

---
My RFF Gallery | My Flickr | StreetLevel Photography
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-02-2008   #10
Keith
On leave from Gallifrey
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Keith is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,136
It makes me happy if I've got the exposure correct on at at least half of the shots in a roll and often I'll get a roll where ninety percent of the exposures are good. The fact that maybe there's nothing there that pleases me artistically doesn't bother me too much at this stage because IMO those type of shots are a little rare at the best of times. Knowing that I have exposure sorted is far more important than producing stunners because when the good shots leap out at me after scanning (not often enough) ... control of exposure is a real bonus and to me a poor exposure will kill a potentially good pic more often than a small focussing error.
__________________
---------------------------
zenfolio

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-02-2008   #11
infrequent
Hexar Guerilla
 
infrequent's Avatar
 
infrequent is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Adelaide
Age: 30
Posts: 705
Quote:
Originally Posted by mabelsound View Post
I had a roll once with like ten that I actually LIKED. That was an awesome day!
i know that feeling!
__________________
Hexar AF
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-02-2008   #12
pesphoto
Registered User
 
pesphoto's Avatar
 
pesphoto is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: R.I.
Age: 47
Posts: 3,789
I have low standards so I would say up to 75%
__________________
My blog



My dad's Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-02-2008   #13
stuken
Registered User
 
stuken is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 165
It depends on what I'm shooting. If its street, maybe one shot out of every ten or 15 rolls that I would show other people. Portraits and other stuff is much higher.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-02-2008   #14
mh2000
Registered User
 
mh2000's Avatar
 
mh2000 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,037
actaully, I only shoot 24ex rolls... and for that, about 3 really good shoots seems to be plenty... so I voted 5 for a 36ex... people really like shooting 36 ex rolls?
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-02-2008   #15
colyn
ישו משיח בנו של אלוהים
 
colyn's Avatar
 
colyn is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: CowTown, Texas
Age: 61
Posts: 4,182
I expect to get half or more that are properly exposed/focused but am happy if 3 are keepers..
__________________
Colyn

The Lone Star State....

Leica M2 | M3 x 2 | IIIa x 2 | IIIc | IIIf black dial | Kodak Retina IIIc | Kodak Retina IIIC |


Flickr

My website

My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-02-2008   #16
irq506
just curious
 
irq506's Avatar
 
irq506 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 326
mmm.. interesting, it seems that exposure issues are a concern to quite a few of you, to me not so much, in fact as long as Im within two stops and focus is reasonably accurate, blur, grain, exposure just doesn't seem to bother me at all. Im very critical however of what is in those frames. Technically, everything is achievable, aesthetically- well thats a different matter... its much more critical, to me, to have an image that speaks, and if it speaks, then the language of technology is no barrier.
I dont know if this makes any sense to anyone other than me, but Im trying to convey a psychology that weighs toward the art and less the tech... Thats why i went back to film, because the cameras are implicitly simplicity!
__________________
the journey is the destination
http://www.flickr.com/photos/devtank
http://www.devtank.com

I have only good gear.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-02-2008   #17
Rayt
Registered User
 
Rayt's Avatar
 
Rayt is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,375
My problem is that I knew it was going to be crap before tripping the shutter.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-02-2008   #18
dazedgonebye
Registered User
 
dazedgonebye's Avatar
 
dazedgonebye is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Arizona
Age: 53
Posts: 3,930
It only takes 1 that I'd like to print to make me happy really.
On the other hand, if I don't come away with 4 or 5 that are good enough to share, I feel I haven't made the best of the situation.
It's not about wasting film so much as wasting the opportunity.
__________________
Steve

"And I know now that the cure for my childhood was not to be looked after, as I once believed; it was to look after someone else." ~Philip Norman

Photography Blog
Flickr
Twitter
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-02-2008   #19
Benjamin Marks
Registered User
 
Benjamin Marks is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vermont
Posts: 2,338
3 keepers on a roll of 36 exposures, or slightly fewer than 1 in 10. It's late though and one reasons in this mental state at one's own peril, but it seems to me that when you read the results above that everyone who says, say "3" also has 2 and 1 shots per roll that are keepers . . .

Ben Marks
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1566'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-02-2008   #20
Keith
On leave from Gallifrey
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Keith is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,136
It's interesting to venture into large format where each exposure takes a little time and involves a certain routine (not good for street photography I realise) ... it makes 35mm film seem like digital does when you shoot 35mm film!
__________________
---------------------------
zenfolio

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-02-2008   #21
chut
Luceat Lux Vestra
 
chut's Avatar
 
chut is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Manila
Posts: 243
4 or 5 keepers in a 36 roll on average that I'd upload to my flickr. It'd be great to have 1 winner per roll, but it's more like 1 in every 3 rolls for me at this point.
__________________
My flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-02-2008   #22
projectbluebird
Film Abuser
 
projectbluebird's Avatar
 
projectbluebird is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Great American West
Age: 31
Posts: 334
Quote:
Originally Posted by mh2000 View Post
people really like shooting 36 ex rolls?
Actually, I feel cheated if I get less than 38. For some reason when I shoot commercial 36-exp rolls with my M3, I always get a few extra. typically 38, but sometimes 39, and once 41!

As for keepers per roll, 2-3 seems to be my average. That's good enough for me.
__________________
Shoot naked, or use gaffer tape!
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-02-2008   #23
Doug
Moderator
 
Doug's Avatar
 
Doug is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pacific NW, USA
Posts: 11,147
I prefer 24-exp rolls to 36, but when I rolled my own I made 'em 30-exp. As to "keepers" per roll, I don't count, but I'm happy with whatever good ones appear, and the occasional one that is really satisfying. For some reason, though, what I think is really satisfying is often not admired by others...
__________________
Dougs Gallery
RFF on Facebook
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-03-2008   #24
payasam
a.k.a. Mukul Dube
 
payasam's Avatar
 
payasam is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Delhi, India
Age: 64
Posts: 4,433
Film was scarce in India, and expensive, when I started out. We were told, in effect, "Don't shoot until you see the whites of their eyes."
__________________
"Payasam" means a sloppy pudding. Little kids love it, and I'm a little kid with a big grey beard and diabetes.
Film: Leica M6, Nicca 3-F; Ultron 35/1.7, Canon 50/1.4, Elmarit 90/2.8, Canon 100/3.5, Hektor 135/4.5
Digital: Olympus E-300, E-3; four Zuiko Digital lenses
RFF gallery
Flickr gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-03-2008   #25
sem
Registered User
 
sem's Avatar
 
sem is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 494
five or six are looking good after developing and scanning. But mostly just one or two keeper in the end.
Sometimes I am not carefull so something went wrong or if I test a new lens and don t like the results.
So I am happy with one or two to keep and look at quite after some time.

sem
__________________
sem

Blog

My first book
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 00:08.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.