Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Cameras / Gear / Photography > Leicas and other Leica Mount Cameras > Leica Screw Mount Copies

Leica Screw Mount Copies Classic Leica Copy forum as listed in the book 300 Leica Copies, including but not limited to Nicca, Leotax, Honor, Canon etc. At one time there was a major part of the camera industry just trying to make a lower cost copy/dirivitive of the original Leica.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Sharpness comparison of Hexanon 35/2 UC LTM vs. 35 Summicron ASPH.
Old 04-04-2007   #1
awilder
Registered User
 
awilder is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,341
Sharpness comparison of Hexanon 35/2 UC LTM vs. 35 Summicron ASPH.

Detail evaluation of a near infinity subject revealed some interesting but not unexpected results. First, the subject full frame at f/2 with the UC.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg UC-f2'-full-frame.jpg (111.3 KB, 208 views)
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=2121'>My Gallery</a>

Last edited by awilder : 04-04-2007 at 20:17.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-04-2007   #2
awilder
Registered User
 
awilder is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,341
Now, Hexanon UC center detail at f/2, f/2.8 and f/4 from left to right.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg UC-crop-f2.jpg (94.7 KB, 241 views)
File Type: jpg UC-f2.8-crop.jpg (94.0 KB, 141 views)
File Type: jpg UC-crop-f4.jpg (96.9 KB, 161 views)
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=2121'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-04-2007   #3
awilder
Registered User
 
awilder is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,341
Now, center detail with the Summicron ASPH. at f/2, f/2.8 and f/4.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 'cron-crop-f2.jpg (94.1 KB, 203 views)
File Type: jpg 'cron-f2.8-crop.jpg (93.2 KB, 96 views)
File Type: jpg 'cron-crop-f4.jpg (95.2 KB, 123 views)
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=2121'>My Gallery</a>

Last edited by awilder : 04-04-2007 at 19:46.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-04-2007   #4
awilder
Registered User
 
awilder is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,341
Edge detail with the Hexanon UC at f/2 and f/4
Attached Images
File Type: jpg UC-f2-crop''.jpg (91.3 KB, 152 views)
File Type: jpg UC-f4-crop''.jpg (108.9 KB, 98 views)
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=2121'>My Gallery</a>

Last edited by awilder : 04-04-2007 at 19:35.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-04-2007   #5
awilder
Registered User
 
awilder is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,341
Lastly, edge detail with the Summicron ASPH. at f/2 and f/4.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 'cron-2-crop''.jpg (78.8 KB, 144 views)
File Type: jpg 'cron-crop-f4''.jpg (87.2 KB, 90 views)
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=2121'>My Gallery</a>

Last edited by awilder : 04-04-2007 at 19:36.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-04-2007   #6
awilder
Registered User
 
awilder is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,341
The interesting thing about the Hexanon in the center shots is that focus is optimised for f/2 and stopping down progressively softens. Its most likely due to focus shift from spherical aberration (SA) where the rf cam is likely optimised for the resultant focus at f/2. The central sharpness with the Summicron is less than the Hexanon at f/2 but it progressively improves by stopping down and by f/4 indicating the lens' rf cam is optimised for optical focus at f/4 or smaller. The softness at wider apertures maybe the effect of SA induced focus shift. At f/2.8 both lenses are equally sharp indicating a kind of intersection in focus. The slightly better edge performance of the Hexanon may be due to flatter field at infinity but I have other test samples shot at 70" where the Summicron clearly is sharper in the corner than the Hexanon as seen here: http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=711726. The figurines are positioned slightly forward so their rf focus is an exact match to the center target focus.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=2121'>My Gallery</a>

Last edited by awilder : 05-31-2007 at 10:37.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-05-2007   #7
jja
Registered User
 
jja is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 538
I noticed a similar loss in sharpness as the Hex stopped down, and I could not explain it--I thought there might be a mistake in the posting. Thanks for the explanation.

From your samples, it looks like the Summicron has better shadow detail (she the shrubs/bushes).
__________________
My Flickr

My RFF Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-05-2007   #8
awilder
Registered User
 
awilder is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,341
No mistake in the posting, I double checked. I'm 99.99% certain the loss of central sharpness is simply due to focus shift from spherical aberration as described in the excerpts from the Konica technical report on the lens seen here: http://wiki.silvergrain.org/wiki/ind...n_35mm_f.2F2.0. Except for coating differences, optically the lens is identical to the Hexar AF as evidenced by the lens' block diagrams and MTF charts.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=2121'>My Gallery</a>

Last edited by awilder : 04-08-2007 at 19:54.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-10-2007   #9
espressogeek
Registered User
 
espressogeek is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 210
Heck, my UC gets so sharp at f stops above 4 it hurts. I need to look into this more or perhaps i dont ; -)
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-10-2007   #10
awilder
Registered User
 
awilder is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,341
Interestingly, the sharpness of the Summicron and Hexanon are the same if you look at the crops shown below, right of center from the original full frame shot, both at f/4. The Summicron is the left and the Hexanon on the right.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg crop-'cron-f4'.jpg (93.3 KB, 85 views)
File Type: jpg crop-UC-f4'.jpg (93.6 KB, 84 views)
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=2121'>My Gallery</a>

Last edited by awilder : 04-13-2007 at 08:46.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-10-2007   #11
awilder
Registered User
 
awilder is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,341
Similarly, sharpness is about the same between the two lenses at f/2 and obviously slightly softer than above. The crops are in the same order as above.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg crop-'cron-f2'.jpg (91.2 KB, 53 views)
File Type: jpg crop-UC-f2'.jpg (87.4 KB, 52 views)
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=2121'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bokeh Test: Canon 35 vs. 35 Asph Mackinaw Optics Theory - 18 10-29-2011 12:21
Voigtlander rectangular 21mm LH-1 hood for 35 summicron ? Flyfisher Tom Leica M Film Cameras 3 07-22-2006 07:51
1961 35mm Summilux vs. 1997 35mm Summicron ASPH. Magus Rangefinder Photography Discussion 17 03-21-2006 12:00
Summicron 35 3rd version vs Hexanon 35/2 nksyoon Leica M Film Cameras 11 02-15-2006 15:07
35/2 Summicron (4th ver.) vs. new 35/2 Biogon Honus Leica M Film Cameras 17 12-13-2005 10:16



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 13:50.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.