| Leica Screw Mount Copies Classic Leica Copy forum as listed in the book 300 Leica Copies, including but not limited to Nicca, Leotax, Honor, Canon etc. At one time there was a major part of the camera industry just trying to make a lower cost copy/dirivitive of the original Leica. |
 |
Sharpness comparison of Hexanon 35/2 UC LTM vs. 35 Summicron ASPH. |
 |
04-04-2007
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
awilder is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,298
|
Sharpness comparison of Hexanon 35/2 UC LTM vs. 35 Summicron ASPH.
Detail evaluation of a near infinity subject revealed some interesting but not unexpected results. First, the subject full frame at f/2 with the UC.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=2121'>My Gallery</a>
Last edited by awilder : 04-04-2007 at 19:17.
|
|
|
|
04-04-2007
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
awilder is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,298
|
Now, Hexanon UC center detail at f/2, f/2.8 and f/4 from left to right.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=2121'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
04-04-2007
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
awilder is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,298
|
Now, center detail with the Summicron ASPH. at f/2, f/2.8 and f/4.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=2121'>My Gallery</a>
Last edited by awilder : 04-04-2007 at 18:46.
|
|
|
|
04-04-2007
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
awilder is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,298
|
Edge detail with the Hexanon UC at f/2 and f/4
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=2121'>My Gallery</a>
Last edited by awilder : 04-04-2007 at 18:35.
|
|
|
|
04-04-2007
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
awilder is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,298
|
Lastly, edge detail with the Summicron ASPH. at f/2 and f/4.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=2121'>My Gallery</a>
Last edited by awilder : 04-04-2007 at 18:36.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
04-04-2007
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
awilder is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,298
|
The interesting thing about the Hexanon in the center shots is that focus is optimised for f/2 and stopping down progressively softens. Its most likely due to focus shift from spherical aberration (SA) where the rf cam is likely optimised for the resultant focus at f/2. The central sharpness with the Summicron is less than the Hexanon at f/2 but it progressively improves by stopping down and by f/4 indicating the lens' rf cam is optimised for optical focus at f/4 or smaller. The softness at wider apertures maybe the effect of SA induced focus shift. At f/2.8 both lenses are equally sharp indicating a kind of intersection in focus. The slightly better edge performance of the Hexanon may be due to flatter field at infinity but I have other test samples shot at 70" where the Summicron clearly is sharper in the corner than the Hexanon as seen here: http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=711726. The figurines are positioned slightly forward so their rf focus is an exact match to the center target focus.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=2121'>My Gallery</a>
Last edited by awilder : 05-31-2007 at 09:37.
|
|
|
|
 |
04-05-2007
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
jja is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 515
|
I noticed a similar loss in sharpness as the Hex stopped down, and I could not explain it--I thought there might be a mistake in the posting. Thanks for the explanation.
From your samples, it looks like the Summicron has better shadow detail (she the shrubs/bushes).
|
|
|
|
04-05-2007
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
awilder is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,298
|
No mistake in the posting, I double checked. I'm 99.99% certain the loss of central sharpness is simply due to focus shift from spherical aberration as described in the excerpts from the Konica technical report on the lens seen here: http://wiki.silvergrain.org/wiki/ind...n_35mm_f.2F2.0. Except for coating differences, optically the lens is identical to the Hexar AF as evidenced by the lens' block diagrams and MTF charts.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=2121'>My Gallery</a>
Last edited by awilder : 04-08-2007 at 18:54.
|
|
|
|
04-10-2007
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
espressogeek is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 212
|
Heck, my UC gets so sharp at f stops above 4 it hurts. I need to look into this more or perhaps i dont ; -)
|
|
|
|
04-10-2007
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
awilder is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,298
|
Interestingly, the sharpness of the Summicron and Hexanon are the same if you look at the crops shown below, right of center from the original full frame shot, both at f/4. The Summicron is the left and the Hexanon on the right.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=2121'>My Gallery</a>
Last edited by awilder : 04-13-2007 at 07:46.
|
|
|
|
04-10-2007
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
awilder is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,298
|
Similarly, sharpness is about the same between the two lenses at f/2 and obviously slightly softer than above. The crops are in the same order as above.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=2121'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:22. |
|
|