Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Digital Rangefinder Cameras > Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M"

Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M" Discussions about the Leica M8 /M 8.2 / M9 / M9-P/ M-E / M Monochrom / M10 aka "M": Leica digital M mount rangefinder cameras. Naming the new digital M the "Leica M" is VERY unfortunate as it will only confuse newbies with other Leica M cameras of the the past. Happily there is room for confusion with only the past 59 years of Leica M production ... since Leica introduced the Leica M system in 1953. All Hail for the Leica Marketing Department learning Leica M history!

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next

What is all the fuss about
Old 09-15-2006   #1
mad_boy
Registered User
 
mad_boy's Avatar
 
mad_boy is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Holland near Rotterdam
Posts: 183
What is all the fuss about

Reading through these threads there are a number of issues that come up time and time again, which do not seem worth the fuss.

1) Battery dependance
2) Full frame sensor versus cropped sensor
3) Depreciation of the M8
(strangely enough no complaints on direction of m8's shutter dial ).

ad1
Spare batteries take less space than 2 rolls of film, which most of us carry around. Fresh batteries last a very long time, so if you are approaching a critical situation, just put in the fresh battery. (like you fuel up your car before entering the bush).
And then the stories that batteries are not reliable. how many of these complainers have a crank in their car to crank-start the engine just in case the battery fails?

ad2
Sensor size. The main advantage of a larger sensor is the lower depth of field. If that is your desire stop demanding a full frame sensor; ask for a larger than full frame sensor. Why not 40mm sensor... or 41mm.....

ad3
Depreciation worries assume that the value of the camera drops when a new model is launched, and reading the stories aparently people expect M8's to be more of less worthless in 5 years time.
WHY? In the standard Leica M forum all you guys rave about old style optics like the 2nd generation whatever-cron. Objectively that lens has been bypassed in all quality aspects by its successors, but it still has value because of its particular character. If the M8 takes great pictures today it will do so in 15 years time (if still functioning). There will be people who love the handling, looks or whatever. Who knows people will be talking about the beauty of the digital noise as they do currently over the 'glow' (which is a lens aberation as well). I have the Digilux2. It has been bypassed in Pixel count already a long tiem ago (actually when it came out ). But I still have it, use it and are happy with it and probably will when the latest models boost 20 Mpixels.

Is there really no-one complaining on the direction of the shutter wheel ????

And yes, befefore you state the obvious....
This is a long post on points that are not worth the fuss .....

Mad_boy
__________________
It costs so much, it can't be bad (c) Loudon Wainwright III
  Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Time to see what all the fuss is about.. steve garza Leica M Film Cameras 4 04-06-2006 12:25



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 23:58.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.