Photos for the City Tourism Office
I have most of the summer to come up with some new photos to be used on the web and printed on maps and stuff.
1 Do I go for the 'standard' photos of the landmarks?
2 Or a quirky take on a landmark?
3 Or a small detail that illustrates the city but it's not obvious where it is?
I prefer the third option.
What would you do?
Yesterday (18 May) I posted a photo to my images/no words blog sort of gallery. 'Along the Lane': a defocused photo of poppies on an empty site nearby.
Please, if you have the time look at my photo site (clicky in the signature below) and tell me what you would produce. Especially if you like weird stuff and one day need to do tourist-friendly stuff.