Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Optics and Lenses -

Optics and Lenses - This forum is aimed towards the TECHNICAL side of photographic OPTICS and LENSES. There will be some overlap by camera/manufacturer, but this forum is for the heavy duty tech discussions. This is NOT the place to discuss a specific lens or lens line, do that in the appropriate forum. This is the forum to discuss optics or lenses in general, to learn about the tech behind the lenses and images. IF you have a question about a specific lens, post it in the forum about that type of camera, NOT HERE.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

'C' mount lenses
Old 08-20-2012   #1
Dralowid
Michael
 
Dralowid's Avatar
 
Dralowid is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,145
'C' mount lenses

Hope I am on the right forum.

I've been working my way through a cupboard of movie cameras, something I used to collect about 20 years ago. I realise that I am rich in older 'c' mount lenses of all sorts of shapes and sizes, Dallymeyer, T&H, B&H, Bausch and Lom, Wollensak, Som Berthiot, Kern, Kodak, Angenieux etc etc, you get the general idea.

Then I read somewhere that these have come back into fashion for the digital generation, both for still and movie...

Is this really true? Am I rich beyond my wildest dreams or is it another passing example of ...you could if you wanted to and had the right adapter...??

Michael
(who will avoid asking the same question about 'D' mount lenses.
__________________
I,II,III,SL,M6
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-20-2012   #2
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
 
rxmd's Avatar
 
rxmd is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kyrgyzstan
Posts: 6,044
You can, but only on mirrorless cameras with a short register (Micro 4/3 and NEX). It will vignette a fair bit, more so with the NEX, but there are a lot of people doing it, Flickr is full of pictures taken with adapted C-mount lenses.

Oh, and D mount lenses will work too, but probably only on the Pentax Q and many will vignette even there
__________________
Bing! You're hypnotized!
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-20-2012   #3
Kekoekoo
Registered User
 
Kekoekoo's Avatar
 
Kekoekoo is offline
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 6
Actually, I've seen that some people in this forum have been using C-mount lenses in their micro 4/3s cameras (from cheap plastic to angenieux lenses). Specially those lenses with around 25mm focal length, as they become 50mm lenses in m4/3. They are usable with a C-mount to m4/3 adapter (those are easy to find...). I can't tell about the price but I'm sure you will find some references on the net about actual prices...

Sergio
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-20-2012   #4
rbelyell
Registered User
 
rbelyell is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 803
my experience with many c mounts on m4/3 is that many work great. they are tiny but typically perform well, though sometimes the bokeh can be pretty funky. wider than 25mm vignetting is terrible; at 25 its workable, above 25 usually not at problem at all. the kodak cine (vs anastigmatic) lenses are great across the board. zeiss has a tevidon line that is excellent as well. i havent found one cine zoom that works properly when mounted.
tony
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-10-2012   #5
chrisso
Registered User
 
chrisso is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oz
Posts: 118
I use a Kodak Cine Ektar 25mm F1.4 C Mount with my panasonic GH1 (m4/3rds), and I have to say it's really outstanding.
Beautiful colours, pretty sharp too.

It does vignette slightly.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-11-2012   #6
Mr_Flibble
Registered User
 
Mr_Flibble's Avatar
 
Mr_Flibble is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Lowlands
Age: 36
Posts: 2,455
Yeah, tell me about it

I'm trying to complete a B&H Filmo 70DL set with some period lenses. The short c-mount lenses (between 0.5" and 1") for 8mm and 16mm are still cheap, but anything longer becomes expensive pretty darn fast.


Got a 3" Raptar on the way. Still need something longer to round out the set.
__________________
Rick - "If you're gonna shoot, shoot! Don't Talk"
Loaded with film: Kiev 88

Latest Toys: "Camera Exotica" photo book
Latest Activity: Geertruidenberg 800 Years festival
My Blog/Galleries
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-11-2012   #7
Dralowid
Michael
 
Dralowid's Avatar
 
Dralowid is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,145
Did they ever make this?

http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/kenk...era-announced/

I've been thinking about this, if I strip the best 'c' mounts from my collection of movie cameras I will indeed make money but I will devalue the cameras and split up things that are frankly a bit historic.

For example I have a pre war 'no name' Bolex H16. It has a full set of tidy contemporary Dallymeyer lenses on it. They would make good money but the poor old body by itself is little more than a curiosity.
__________________
I,II,III,SL,M6
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-11-2012   #8
Mr_Flibble
Registered User
 
Mr_Flibble's Avatar
 
Mr_Flibble is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Lowlands
Age: 36
Posts: 2,455
Ebay sellers seems to ask big bucks for complete Filmo (and Eyemo) sets. So splitting up might indeed not be advisable...then again, I haven't checked on how many actually sold at these kind of prices.
__________________
Rick - "If you're gonna shoot, shoot! Don't Talk"
Loaded with film: Kiev 88

Latest Toys: "Camera Exotica" photo book
Latest Activity: Geertruidenberg 800 Years festival
My Blog/Galleries
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 14:23.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.