Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film > Scanners / Scanner Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 08-11-2012   #526
wblynch
Registered User
 
wblynch is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 465
I am surprised they still refuse to post samples...
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-11-2012   #527
clayne
film militant
 
clayne is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA | Kuching, MY | Jakarta, ID
Posts: 450
I don't believe anyone said anything about refusing to post samples - perhaps they're just working on things still? Scanner manufacturers are probably not the people you have to fear for pulling shenanigans at this point.
__________________
Flickr | Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-13-2012   #528
mdruziak
Registered User
 
mdruziak is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 166
Quote:
Originally Posted by clayne View Post
I don't believe anyone said anything about refusing to post samples - perhaps they're just working on things still? Scanner manufacturers are probably not the people you have to fear for pulling shenanigans at this point.
It's not that we refuse to post samples. The samples I have seen were basically snapshots used for internal testing that wouldn't show the scanner in its best form. Camera focus and/or camera lens resolution were issues with the images. I am working with the product manager to get some images that were exposed with higher quality equipment.

There are no shenanigans. Just understand that the product team is very busy and they don't have a lot of time to generate PR samples.
__________________
________________________________________
My Photo A Day Blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-13-2012   #529
david.elliott
Registered User
 
david.elliott is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdruziak View Post
It's not that we refuse to post samples. The samples I have seen were basically snapshots used for internal testing that wouldn't show the scanner in its best form. Camera focus and/or camera lens resolution were issues with the images. I am working with the product manager to get some images that were exposed with higher quality equipment.

There are no shenanigans. Just understand that the product team is very busy and they don't have a lot of time to generate PR samples.
If you send me a preproduction unit, I'll go out with my rolleiflex, hasselblad, m3, r8, and a tripod and take all sorts of photos and make sample scans for you!

edit - by the way, the photos you posted on 8/8 and 7/30 are, in my opinion, two of your best. I really like those a lot. Have always loved fog photos.
__________________
My Website - Rendered In Silver

  Reply With Quote

Old 08-13-2012   #530
mdruziak
Registered User
 
mdruziak is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 166
Quote:
Originally Posted by david.elliott View Post
If you send me a preproduction unit, I'll go out with my rolleiflex, hasselblad, m3, r8, and a tripod and take all sorts of photos and make sample scans for you!

edit - by the way, the photos you posted on 8/8 and 7/30 are, in my opinion, two of your best. I really like those a lot. Have always loved fog photos.
Keep on sending the compliments and I'll send you a scanner

Another thing to consider is we do not have a staff photographer. Our Product Manager for the OF120 happens to be a very creative photographer, but she is very wrapped up with launching the scanner so shooting demo shots is not on her radar screen right now. I have some negatives that will be loaned to me so as soon as my scanner gets here I will have something to post.
__________________
________________________________________
My Photo A Day Blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-13-2012   #531
david.elliott
Registered User
 
david.elliott is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdruziak View Post
Keep on sending the compliments and I'll send you a scanner

Another thing to consider is we do not have a staff photographer. Our Product Manager for the OF120 happens to be a very creative photographer, but she is very wrapped up with launching the scanner so shooting demo shots is not on our radar screen right now. I have some negatives that will be loaned to me so as soon as my scanner gets here I will have something to post.
I'm always happy to help out, both with compliments and scanning. My offer stands. If you ever feel like taking me up on it, just send me a pm!

Looking forward to seeing the scans of the loaned negatives.
__________________
My Website - Rendered In Silver

  Reply With Quote

Old 08-13-2012   #532
bwcolor
Registered User
 
bwcolor is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 2,173
This idea of supplying a scanner to one of the talented members of RFF that use both 35mm and MF, color and B&W is a great idea. It is easy to see who meets these criterion. I qualify in all but the talent part, so don't send me one.

This is a real marketing stroke of brilliance.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-13-2012   #533
defconfunk
n00b
 
defconfunk is offline
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 92
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdruziak View Post
Keep on sending the compliments and I'll send you a scanner

Another thing to consider is we do not have a staff photographer. Our Product Manager for the OF120 happens to be a very creative photographer, but she is very wrapped up with launching the scanner so shooting demo shots is not on her radar screen right now. I have some negatives that will be loaned to me so as soon as my scanner gets here I will have something to post.
Thanks for keeping us informed on this project. Personally, seeing a company directly involved with community (not just posting a facebook page) is worth more than advertisement.

I find it odd (not unsually, simply unexpected) that a company focused on optical equipment, with a specialist line of photo specific scanners, doesn't have a staff photographer. I don't mean as a full time photographer, but I would have expected you'd have more than a few really dedicated photographers on the team who could fill the role as and when needed. I would have guessed a couple of the engineers working on the film scanners would have a handful of technically excellent images that could be used.

Edit: Looking over your photo-a-day, blog you have some awesome stuff (7/1 is fantastic). Do you work totally in digital?
__________________
I have a camera. I enjoy pushing the big button.
http://mattkrull.tumblr.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-14-2012   #534
Glass Addict
Registered User
 
Glass Addict is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 95
I didn't read through all the comments as it spans 22 pages..
I'm in need of a 120 film scanner and have been waiting on this for a long time....
Is there a semi-firm date on this scanner? If the date is too far out, I may have no choice but to resort to a used Nikon or Epson..
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-14-2012   #535
jtm6
Registered User
 
jtm6 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 275
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glass Addict View Post
I didn't read through all the comments as it spans 22 pages..
I'm in need of a 120 film scanner and have been waiting on this for a long time....
Is there a semi-firm date on this scanner? If the date is too far out, I may have no choice but to resort to a used Nikon or Epson..
Here is the last official word I've read:


Quote:
Originally Posted by mdruziak View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by MSUSpartan View Post
Let's say it's announced at Photokina, any idea on when we can actually buy one?
Right now the target is the end of September.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-2012   #536
caasols
Registered User
 
caasols is offline
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 53
I don't know if this was posted, but I was contacted today by Plustek regarding pricing and avalibility on the new Opticfilm..

Dear Carlos Sol,

Thank you for your inquiry of OpticFilm 120.

OpticFilm 120 will be ready around end of November and beginning of
December. MSRP: 1999 Euro

Best Regards,
Nadia LU
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-2012   #537
buzzardkid
packin' light
 
buzzardkid's Avatar
 
buzzardkid is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Assen, The Netherlands
Age: 42
Posts: 6,861
Let's hope for discounts to get that scanner moving, I'm not willing to sell gear to afford the scanner...

I've found access to an Imacon for EUR 1,75 per negative and will do initial scanning at home in 1200 dpi to assess what images I want Imaconed


Looking forward to seeing first scans and assess the quality of them, maybe I'll luck into a nice paid gig in the future and can afford it after all
__________________
Cheers, Johan




Leica II (1932), Elmars 50 & 135, Heliar 50: the nickel kit
Leica II (1942), Minifinder, Canon 28, W-Nikkor 35, Elmar 90: the chrome kit
Ricoh GXR Monochrom

Visit johanniels.com!
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-2012   #538
Glass Addict
Registered User
 
Glass Addict is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 95
Ah.. too far away and over my budget..
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-2012   #539
mhanc
Registered User
 
mhanc is offline
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Metropolis
Posts: 437
Not a buyer at that price... Oh well.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-2012   #540
kmallick
Registered User
 
kmallick is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 524
Fuuggget it for that price!
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-2012   #541
bwcolor
Registered User
 
bwcolor is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 2,173
Regarding price. I still have my Nikon, but when that goes, I would rather have high price than low quality. I can use my V-750 for lower quality. Right now, I can't afford this scanner, but I'm glad that they are shooting for better quality... at least that is how I interpret the price. If not, the market will lower the price.

Judging by the number of views on this thread, there is a healthy market on RFF for a new film scanner.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-2012   #542
mafoofan
Registered User
 
mafoofan is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 85
Assuming performance on par with or better than the Nikon 9000ED, the price seems fair. People scoffing at the expense would not have bought the Nikon when it was available, either. Now, used Nikons sell for huge premiums over their retail prices when new.

I think we need to be more realistic about the cost of such things.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-2012   #543
stompyq
Registered User
 
stompyq is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 615
I think i'll stick with my Epson
__________________
www.pramodhsphotos.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-2012   #544
wblynch
Registered User
 
wblynch is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 465
It will be interesting to see how many are sold. We might all be surprised.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-2012   #545
kmallick
Registered User
 
kmallick is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 524
The price may be justified for the quality and target customer. But for many amateurs here on RFF like me, were hoping that these would be affordable. Bummer, its not. I will stick to a Canon 9000F flat bed as well.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-2012   #546
hanskerensky
Registered User
 
hanskerensky's Avatar
 
hanskerensky is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Limburg, The Netherlands
Posts: 398
They also should sell it without the Silverfast SW, guess that would let the price drop by 200 till 300 Euros and make it a bit more affordable (higher sales numbers Plustek !).

Take for instance the medium format scanner Reflecta MF 5000. That costs € 1275,-- but if you buy it with Siverfast Ai Studio 8 the price rises to € 1675,-- !!
__________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Visit my Flickr Pages!
  Reply With Quote

Brighter side
Old 08-17-2012   #547
wkkato
wkkato
 
wkkato is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 27
Brighter side

Quote:
Originally Posted by kmallick View Post
The price may be justified for the quality and target customer. But for many amateurs here on RFF like me, were hoping that these would be affordable. Bummer, its not. I will stick to a Canon 9000F flat bed as well.
On the brighter side, maybe this will drive the prices for used 8000's and 9000's down.

Of course, not if you want to sell yours.

Warren
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-2012   #548
kmallick
Registered User
 
kmallick is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 524
Quote:
Originally Posted by wkkato View Post
Of course, not if you want to sell yours.
Nope, that lucky!

I believe the news of the incoming Plustek 120 already started driving their prices down. But I cannot justify them.

I think I will start enjoying wet B&W and RA4 printing even more.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-2012   #549
---f
one day at a time
 
---f is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 273
it's probably just suggested retail, let's wait and see what the market will bear. I do hope it's a reasonable price, I do get good results from Canonscan 9950F, but it's not perfect. LOL, what ever is?
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-2012   #550
literiter
Registered User
 
literiter's Avatar
 
literiter is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canadian Rockies
Age: 67
Posts: 1,104
Works out to about $2400 at manufacturers suggested retail. That could end up at as low as $1900 in the store.

I have a Nikon cs9000 and I'm happy with it, but I don't see a problem with the price of the Plustek.
__________________
Paul
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:43.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.