Leica IIIC - cases for/against?

[goamules]

Originally Posted by texchappy

Interesting goamules. So how would all rank the Canon's versus the Leica LTM's?

I'm sure you just meant the question tongue in cheek, I just did rank them!

[texchappy]

Actually, I was looking for input and opinion from other users.

[digitalintrigue]

Get one with a good RF patch and add an OKARO

[nongfuspring]

Originally Posted by goamules

Having had both, I'd personally look for a nice Canon IVSB. The brighter, bigger viewfinder, with 3 magnification levels are a huge improvement. Oh, and the RF and Viewfinder are the same eyepiece. And they are newer and usually have better curtains. And their bodies are solid so you never have to worry about a flaking cover. Etc., Etc.... I've had about 5 Canon Barnack types and they all worked fine. Can't say the same with my Leica IIIc, even AFTER a new shutter curtain from Yousin.

I've noticed a few on ebay that are in fairly good condition and somewhat cheaper than the any of the Leicas. How does the workmanship/handling compare?

[Bingley]

Originally Posted by texchappy

Actually, I was looking for input and opinion from other users.

OK, I've got a Canon IVSB2 as well as a Leica IIIc. Both are built incredibly well and are almost identical in exterior dimensions although the Canon feels slightly heavier. The IVSB2 has the advantage of a single vf/rf w/ three levels of adjustable magnification. This can be quite useful for fine-focusing, and the highest level of magnification appears to give the view of a 100 mm lens.

The IIIc has a diopter for eye relief, which the Canon lacks.

As far as loading and handling are concerned, I feel they're identical.

Bottom line: you really can't go wrong w/ either camera. My sense is that current prices for the IVSB2 are a little higher than for a IIIc of comparable quality, probably b/c the IVSB2 was a later model that competed with the Leica IIIf/IIIG. Regardless, I'd get the one in the best condition.

[Red Robin]

I have been offered a 1937 leica + a collapsable lens also a '37. My question is this: Do the two prongs (for a flash) change the camera from a IIIa to some other name? I know Canon changed names with every upgrade. How is it different from a IIIc?

[satedesco]

About sharkskin. sharkskin is somewhat rare. it was only produced for a few years- unfortunately coinciding with some of the worst iiic chrome pitting/peeling issues. it does not always fetch a higher price. but grip wise, it is a superior surface to regular vulcanite . i have ownedd many, and never had a sharkskin vulcanite dry, crack, peel, separate, or chunk off. i think it is the most stable, practical cover leica ever made and wished they had used it on some M cameras.