| Zeiss Contax Forum for the classic Zeiss Contax I, II, III, IIa, IIIa , G series, and if you want to push it, the nice Contax point and shoots. Some spill over from the Kievs, the Soviet copy of the Contax II/III can also be expected. Plus the ONLY production camera ever made in classic Zeiss Contax Rangefinder mount WITH TTL metering ... the Voigtlander Bessa R2C. |
 |
21mm Viewfinder |
 |
07-21-2012
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
dweekie is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 20
|
21mm Viewfinder
After 2 years of being on the fence, I finally snagged a Contax G21 lens. I didn't get a viewfinder though  .
I guess I'm taking this as an opportunity to explore other options since G users only seem to use the G finder, whereas other lens users never seem to use the G finder.
Is the G21 viewfinder worth searching for? Or is it a relic for the system with better options available elsewhere?
|
|
|
|
07-21-2012
|
#2
|
|
neo-romanticist
kbg32 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 4,166
|
You can use any 21mm finder. It doesn't matter. The 21 G originally was sold with the finder as a set.
|
|
|
|
07-21-2012
|
#3
|
|
ʎlʇuǝɹǝɟɟıp sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝS
kdemas is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,153
|
The Contax 21mm finder is excellent but you can certainly use another brand. The Zeiss is the nicest I've ever seen.
|
|
|
|
07-21-2012
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Robert Lai is offline
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 423
|
Try the Cosina Voigtlander 21mm finder. Metal, has 25mm frame marks in it also, and not expensive. Stephen Gandy sells them.
|
|
|
|
07-21-2012
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
gshybrid is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 765
|
I have a VC viewfinder I don't need... I sent you a PM.
|
|
|
|
07-21-2012
|
#6
|
|
Non-Registered User
axiom is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 691
|
I have both the G21 finder and VC metal 21mm finder.
The VC one offers bigger and brighter image IMO.
But the G21 feels more contrasty
|
|
|
|
07-21-2012
|
#7
|
|
genius and moron
sepiareverb is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NEK
Posts: 7,120
|
I use the Leica Frankenfinder with all extra-wides on all my RF cameras. Stunning finder with a very visible and useful bubble, as well as adjustable framelines as one gets closer to the subject. Impeccably built. Bubble not absolutley necessary for a 21 I suppose, but helpful at times. Just out the other day with the G2/21/Frankenfinder. Perhaps overkill if the 21 is your only very wide lens. Probably costs more than the 21 did...
|
|
|
|
07-21-2012
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
awilder is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,298
|
The ZM 21 finder is by FAR the best 21 finder ever made and I suspect even better than the Contax G version. The CV finder is OK but has more distortion with less brightness, something you'd appreciate in framing a poorly lit subject.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=2121'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
07-21-2012
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
kzphoto is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,103
|
I picked p a G21 about a week ago that came with the viewfinder. The view isn't as bright as the ZM finder and it has a cross hair in the middle of the finder. It may be distracting for some, but I use it on my Ricoh GRD IV with the little accessory lens and it makes a good looking kit. If you can find a cheap G21 finder, buy it. The Leica and ZM equivalents are only very slightly better and you would need to have them side by side to notice.
|
|
|
|
07-21-2012
|
#10
|
|
ʎlʇuǝɹǝɟɟıp sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝS
kdemas is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,153
|
Nice! I hope the VF you got was in decent shape
Great idea using it on the GRD!
KD
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kzphoto
I picked p a G21 about a week ago that came with the viewfinder. The view isn't as bright as the ZM finder and it has a cross hair in the middle of the finder. It may be distracting for some, but I use it on my Ricoh GRD IV with the little accessory lens and it makes a good looking kit. If you can find a cheap G21 finder, buy it. The Leica and ZM equivalents are only very slightly better and you would need to have them side by side to notice.
|
|
|
|
|
07-21-2012
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
john_s is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 565
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Lai
Try the Cosina Voigtlander 21mm finder. Metal, has 25mm frame marks in it also, and not expensive. Stephen Gandy sells them.
|
While the 25mm frames could be a handy addition to the current VC 21mm viewfinder, I prefer the older one because I find the extra framelines clutter the view.
|
|
|
|
07-21-2012
|
#12
|
|
nobody special
Bob Michaels is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Apopka FL (USA)
Age: 69
Posts: 2,938
|
I find finders to be very non critical. Any one will serve the purpose.
I used the ContaxG 21mm finder with that system and 21mm Biogon for years. I now use the CV finder with a CV 21mm lens. Either finder is more than adequate. Buy based on price because it will make no difference in your photos.
|
|
|
|
07-21-2012
|
#13
|
|
Dad Photographer
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,727
|
I also find the finders not to be a critical factor in photography. I use a 20mm finder with a 19m lens and also a 21mm lens. I use what I get my hands on.
|
|
|
|
07-22-2012
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
dweekie is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 20
|
Wow, I didn't realize viewfinders were so personal, even compared to lenses!
Thank you for all the responses. It seems the consensus is that the G21 viewfinder does not bring anything to the table (other than matching color) compared to other options. gshybrid offered a plastic voigtlander at a good price. If that falls through, I think the metal voigtlander 21/25 is perfect for me since I have a ZM25 as well (though only on the GXR for now).
The Zeiss is extremely appealing, but I just can't justify the price for my own use.
|
|
|
|
07-22-2012
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
thegman is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London
Age: 33
Posts: 2,983
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dweekie
After 2 years of being on the fence, I finally snagged a Contax G21 lens. I didn't get a viewfinder though  .
I guess I'm taking this as an opportunity to explore other options since G users only seem to use the G finder, whereas other lens users never seem to use the G finder.
Is the G21 viewfinder worth searching for? Or is it a relic for the system with better options available elsewhere?
|
If you're interested, I have a Leica 21mm finder for sale, not put it in the classifieds yet, but PM me if interested.
|
|
|
|
07-22-2012
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
Crazy Fedya is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 747
|
I have picked up 21mm f/4.5 Biogon for my Contax RF's, and am thinking about getting either Zeiss 440 turret finder, or original 21mm finder,that came with said Biogon. Any opinions on these two?
Normally, I use KMZ turret finder, Nikon and Leitz 35-135, and find them adequate, so dimness of them don't really bother me, since they are for reference, for the most part. I am just wondering about the difference between said two finders at 21mm.
__________________
Thanks,
Sam.
|
|
|
|
07-22-2012
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
Crazy Fedya is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 747
|
__________________
Thanks,
Sam.
|
|
|
|
07-22-2012
|
#18
|
|
Registered Boozer
dogbunny is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Көкшетау, Қазақстан
Posts: 503
|
Regardless of quality, which is the most compact? I didn't mind by Avenon at first, a little annoyed with it atm.
__________________
Deuteronomy 23:1 --He that is wounded in the stones, or hath his privy member cut off, shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord.
|
|
|
|
07-27-2012
|
#19
|
|
Registered User
kzphoto is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,103
|
I think the CV finders are definitely the most compact. The G21 finder is huge in comparison to the ZM and Leica equivalents.
@Kent: The finder is superb! I use it on my GRD IV with the little accessory lens. It makes a pretty match!
|
|
|
|
07-27-2012
|
#20
|
|
neo-romanticist
kbg32 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 4,166
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy Fedya
|
I have no idea what that is. It looks like some "cobbled" viewfinder. I especially like the electrical tape mask on the front element.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
07-27-2012
|
#21
|
|
Camera hacker
Phil_F_NM is offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ciudad de Jersey, Nuevo Jersey
Age: 36
Posts: 2,114
|
The ZM finders, whatever focal length they cover, are brighter than normal human vision. They are simply amazing. The 21mm finder has just a fraction more distortion than a Super Angulon, which is to say almost none. The ZM finders are optical wonders and I think they are better than many lenses these days. If only they had helicoids and apertures. I digress.
I've owned 2 ZM finders and a Leica 21mm finder (later plastic version) and the ZM finders blew the Leica unit away.
I've had to scale down my "collection" of cameras and due to cost and a friendly deal with a fellow RFF member, I have the Leica 21mm finder that I used to own and my friend has the ZM 21mm that he used to own. I sold the 25/28 finder, also back to the guy who used to own it.
The old plastic Leica finder is better than the CV, on-par with the Kobalux/Avenon, inferior to the new variable Leica version and all pale in comparison to the new ZM finders. if i didn't need the cash, I'd still have two of them.
Phil Forrest
|
|
|
|
 |
07-27-2012
|
#22
|
|
Registered User
ChipShorter is offline
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 18
|
I tried it. I wanted a cheap viewfinder for a pinhole camera and thought I'd take a shot on this.
Absolute, utter, trash.
The image is tiny and very distorted. You have to mash your eye into it to see anything. Avoid avoid avoid.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy Fedya
|
|
|
|
|
07-27-2012
|
#23
|
|
Registered User
zauhar is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,849
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Michaels
I find finders to be very non critical. Any one will serve the purpose.
I used the ContaxG 21mm finder with that system and 21mm Biogon for years. I now use the CV finder with a CV 21mm lens. Either finder is more than adequate. Buy based on price because it will make no difference in your photos.
|
Bob, if the VF has a problem that affects framing, then it becomes critical. I struggled with a problematic 21mm VF for a while, now have one that I can trust.
I think it is a mistake to skimp on the VF.
Randy
__________________
Philadelphia, PA
Leica M3/50mm DR Summicron/21mm SuperAngulon/
90mm Elmarit
Canon 7/50mm f1.4
Leica IIIf/Summitar/Collapsible Summicron
Yashica Electro 35
|
|
|
|
07-27-2012
|
#24
|
|
Striving
ChrisN is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 4,272
|
Question for those that have the Zeiss viewfinder: does it have a rubber or plastic ring around the eyepice (so as not to scratch my glasses)?
Randy - which VF have you ended up with?
|
|
|
|
07-27-2012
|
#25
|
|
Registered User
crispy12 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 259
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy Fedya
|
As a previous poster mentioned, it's really very small. I think it's originally a 28mm finder that the seller taped some electrical tape around.
It does work in the crudest sense. The viewing window is tiny (1.5 x 1 cm?) but it does get the job done. I'd recommend you buy the CV finder if you can afford it. My 15mm finder is an absolute joy to use... only wish they sold the 21/25 in plastic so they'd be more affordable.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 16:23. |
|
|