Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > Half Frames / Subminiatures

Half Frames / Subminiatures This forum is for all half frame 35mm cameras, including the very popular Olympus Pens and their SLR cousins, the Pen F and Pen FT, as well as all smaller than half frame subminiature film cameras.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Olympus Pen FT, 1st Shots & Scanning
Old 07-19-2012   #1
lewis44
Registered User
 
lewis44's Avatar
 
lewis44 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 555
Olympus Pen FT, 1st Shots & Scanning

Just received an Olympus Pen FT w/38mm f1.8 Lens in the mail.
I've always wanted to try one and I got this from one our members.

I took it out for a walk around my back yard just to fire off a quick roll of B&W film to see what the images were like and make sure it worked correctly.

I put in a roll of Arista Premium 100 (24) and off I went.

The camera focuses nicely and is quite easy to use. It being a half frame, it's going to take a little getting used to, being a vertical viewfinder, but 1st impressions were positive.

I was not sure how scanning the negatives would work using a Nikon LS-4000, it being a half frame and all, so:

I asked Ed Hamrick about adjustments using the SA-21 film strip adapter and he said it can be done.

However, taking the easiest route:

I started using the slide attachment with the film strip adapter. It matches up almost perfectly. Almost, meaning this:

You can scan 2 frames at a time and you loose just the slightest bit on one edge. No Big deal

The scanning went very quickly and did some quick processing in Photoshop and here are the results.

Arista Premium 100 Film, Developed in Rodinal 50:1 for 13 minutes, scanned @ 4000 DPI, minor corrections in Photoshop and kicked in a little sharpening.

All in All, I'm Happy with the little Pen. Should be a great walk around camera.








__________________
Randy
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #2
astro8
Registered User
 
astro8's Avatar
 
astro8 is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sydney
Age: 50
Posts: 801
These look great to my eye.

I've also just bought a pen-ft with the 38/1.8. I shot a roll at night on tmax 3200 but haven't developed them yet. I'm expecting grain galore.

The little pen was so easy to focus in dim light and my eyes are certainly past their prime!

I'm so enjoying it that I have a 20/3.5 coming in the mail.
__________________
-Greg

My RFF Gallery

  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #3
lewis44
Registered User
 
lewis44's Avatar
 
lewis44 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 555
A couple of shots fairly close up. The 38 f1.8 is a Nice lens.



__________________
Randy
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #4
goamules
Registered User
 
goamules is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 576
Yep, I just got a PEN-FT and FV with a handful of lenses too. The 38/1.8 is a keeper. I sold the 40/1.4 right away. Too flarey for the tiny bit of speed increase. I also got the 25/4 and 38/2.8 I've been trying.

I too like the way the camera feels and works in the hand. The negatives are pretty tiny, but that's the attraction I guess.
__________________
Garrett

My Flickr Photos
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #5
raytoei@gmail.com
Registered User
 
raytoei@gmail.com's Avatar
 
raytoei@gmail.com is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,839
i have a love-hate relationship with my ft w 38/f1.8 lens.
the viewfinder is dim enough not to be used indoors. *sigh*
__________________
------------------------------------
Film is Photography.
------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #6
goamules
Registered User
 
goamules is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 576
I concur it's a little harder to focus these after being used to rangefinders. But my FV and the 1.8 lens seems pretty easy to focus indoors, unless I'm trying it in a dark room with the shades drawn. That is hard.
__________________
Garrett

My Flickr Photos
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #7
lewis44
Registered User
 
lewis44's Avatar
 
lewis44 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 555
My biggest problem with focusing are my glasses. Hard to see the full viewfinder for framing. Also with progressive lenses, sometimes a problem finding the sweet spot.
As luck would have it, I just found a diopter for the Pen F eyepiece that should work for me.
__________________
Randy
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #8
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,727
I use the FT with the 38/1.8 in addition to a zoom lens 50-90. I sometimes use Pentax M42 lenses on the FT via an adapter.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #9
dweekie
Registered User
 
dweekie is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 20
I just got one of these too. I just need to replace the eyepiece before using it. Anyone have thoughts on the meter? I ordered one of those Weincell zinc-air batteries to play with. I'm hoping it does the trick, but I feel like I'll probably end up using it meterless.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #10
lewis44
Registered User
 
lewis44's Avatar
 
lewis44 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 555
Quote:
Anyone have thoughts on the meter?
I had a C.R.I.S Adapter and it worked fine, but a Wein Cell is just as good if the meter is working
__________________
Randy
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #11
goamules
Registered User
 
goamules is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 576
Here is a shot from my first roll through a FV with the 1.8 (slight crop).

__________________
Garrett

My Flickr Photos
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #12
j.scooter
Registered User
 
j.scooter's Avatar
 
j.scooter is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Toronto-ish
Posts: 829
Thanks for posting, the results look promising.
The scans are really good, way better than anything I have been able to get out of my Epson V600. Just when I thought I was over my GAS....
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #13
digitalintrigue
modern vintage
 
digitalintrigue is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,273
Pens are fun, fun cameras. The 38 is a keeper for sure. For more money, the 60 and 70 are excellent also.

Nice photos!
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #14
eurekaiv
Registered User
 
eurekaiv's Avatar
 
eurekaiv is offline
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 106
Nice to see some action in this forum... my Pen FT is my absolute favorite camera. I have 25/2.8, 38/1.8 and 50-90mm lenses along with Nikon and M42 adapters which I've yet to use.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dweekie View Post
I just got one of these too. I just need to replace the eyepiece before using it. Anyone have thoughts on the meter? I ordered one of those Weincell zinc-air batteries to play with. I'm hoping it does the trick, but I feel like I'll probably end up using it meterless.
I've had fine exposures with my Pen FT and a Wein cell. They don't last very long though, maybe 3-4 months at best and you want to keep your eye out for corrosion as those things seem to start leaking as soon as their dead.
__________________
Sometimes I post my photos on flickr.
Sometimes I update my tumblr.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-27-2012   #15
-Nash-
Registered User
 
-Nash- is offline
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 115
With modern film the results from half frame are quite good!
These were taken with a Pen F (first image got hit with some light leak).
__________________
Flickr -
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rabbinash/
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-27-2012   #16
lewis44
Registered User
 
lewis44's Avatar
 
lewis44 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 555
Quote:
With modern film the results from half frame are quite good!
These were taken with a Pen F (first image got hit with some light leak).
Looks Great. I'm going to try some Kodak BW400CN this weekend and see how it does.
I can get B&W Neg's and be able to get rid of the dust spots scanning, using ICE.
I used to shoot it with my Leica's and liked it a lot.
I remember Dante Stella saying that it was a very good film to use with the Pen's
__________________
Randy
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-27-2012   #17
-Nash-
Registered User
 
-Nash- is offline
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 115
BW400CN turns out pretty clean and not as grainy as XP2 - which I used for the two shots above.
__________________
Flickr -
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rabbinash/
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 17:38.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.