Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Photography General Interest

Photography General Interest Neat Photo stuff NOT particularly about Rangefinders.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Good options for underwater photography?
Old 07-06-2012   #1
henryzwartz
Registered User
 
henryzwartz is offline
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 10
Question Good options for underwater photography?

Hi RFF people,
I am planning on doing some underwater work along the Sydney coast.

This is my first foray into underwater photography, so I'm wondering what are some good starting option in terms of gear?

I am a student of limited funds, but with grand ambitions.

Henry
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-06-2012   #2
Steve Bellayr
Registered User
 
Steve Bellayr's Avatar
 
Steve Bellayr is online now
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,579
For a film your best option is the Nikonos V. For depths up to 60 feet in sunny locations standard color film will suffice w/o flash. The camera costs under $200. But, with any used underwater camera condition is essential as all the seals need to be replaced periodically. That is one choice there are probably many others.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-06-2012   #3
Talex
Registered User
 
Talex is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 90
The Nikonos system is a great choice for underwater photography, and has been the professional standard for decades. I picked up a Nikonos V with 35/2 lens and strobe in great shape for under $200.

For digital, your cheapest options are waterproof P/S cameras. They are limited in depth, however. To go deeper, then the next cheapest is to find an underwater housing for your P/S. The housing ranges from $300-$500, and are rated for 60 feet depth. Olympus, Panasonic, Canon and others make housings for specific cameras.

Going up the price ladder, I picked up an Oly EPL2 and the PT-EP03 housing. The camera and lens was about $400, and housing was about $500. I also picked up a Fantasea strobe for under $200. That should give me much higher quality than P/S cameras, but at a fraction of the price of a DSLR and housing, of which a good one (without port, strobe, strobe arm, and other accessories) can easily cost up to $5000.
__________________
Nikon F3, Nikon F4, Nikon D700, Nikonos V
28/1.4 AFD, 24/2.8 AIS, 28/2.8 AIS, 50/1.4 AIS, 105/2.5 AIS, 70-210/4 AIS, 28-70/2.8 AFS, W-Nikkor 35/2.5, SB-600, Nikonos SB-105
Leica M2, Leica M3 SS, Leica IIIf
Zeiss ZM 28/2.8 Biogon, 35/2.0 Summicron, 50/2.0 Summicron DR, 135/2.8 Elmarit, VC 15/4.5 Heliar, Industar 26-M 55/2.8, VCII meter Fuji GA645Wi
Contax G2, Zeiss Biogon T* 28/2.8, Zeiss Sonnar T* 90/2.8
www.talexphoto.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-06-2012   #4
burancap
Registered User
 
burancap's Avatar
 
burancap is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Carolina
Age: 48
Posts: 667
Another vote for the Nikonos V and the 35 "amphibious" lens.

Great bang for the buck.
__________________
Jeff

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-06-2012   #5
Talex
Registered User
 
Talex is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 90
This picture was taken with the cheap P/S camera in an underwater housing. There are shutter lag issues, and the noise is horrible. But you can still get some keepers.

__________________
Nikon F3, Nikon F4, Nikon D700, Nikonos V
28/1.4 AFD, 24/2.8 AIS, 28/2.8 AIS, 50/1.4 AIS, 105/2.5 AIS, 70-210/4 AIS, 28-70/2.8 AFS, W-Nikkor 35/2.5, SB-600, Nikonos SB-105
Leica M2, Leica M3 SS, Leica IIIf
Zeiss ZM 28/2.8 Biogon, 35/2.0 Summicron, 50/2.0 Summicron DR, 135/2.8 Elmarit, VC 15/4.5 Heliar, Industar 26-M 55/2.8, VCII meter Fuji GA645Wi
Contax G2, Zeiss Biogon T* 28/2.8, Zeiss Sonnar T* 90/2.8
www.talexphoto.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-06-2012   #6
oftheherd
Registered User
 
oftheherd's Avatar
 
oftheherd is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,289
ornate_wrasse should come up and give you some suggestions soon. She does it for a living and gets some incredible photos.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=50'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-06-2012   #7
mrisney
Registered User
 
mrisney's Avatar
 
mrisney is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 292
The Gopro Hero2 came out with a nice dive housing. Cost wise, the whole setup is $340.
Click on the link for the HD clip of my girlfriend and I off of Poipu beach in Kauai




For stills,I would go for the Canon S95 and look on EBay for a used Ikelite waterproof housing
__________________
Analog : Leica MD-2, Mamiya 6, Minolta Autocord, Horseman SW612
Digital : Hero GoPro3, Sigma DP2M, Canon 5D MKIII
My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-06-2012   #8
Shutterspark
The perpetual new guy.
 
Shutterspark is offline
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 152
+1 for the Nikonos V. I've never done anything serious with mine, but good results every time.

Speaking of which, there's one in the classifieds right now.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-06-2012   #9
Aristophanes
Registered User
 
Aristophanes is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 439
http://www.trustedreviews.com/the-be...2011_round-up\

Waterproof comes at a cost. Digital is far more versatile than film and can do video.

GoPro hero is also excellent.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-06-2012   #10
JMQ
Registered User
 
JMQ is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 395
For depths under 30 feet, I'd suggest a digital waterproof p/s like the Olympus Tough series or the Nikon. For deeper dives, I agree with the Nikonos or housing over the digitals.

Talex - nice shot of the sharks and divers.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-06-2012   #11
JMQ
Registered User
 
JMQ is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 395
BTW, there is a Nikonos V in the RFF classifieds now. I am not affiliated with the seller in any way.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-06-2012   #12
Talex
Registered User
 
Talex is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 90
Even though I have the Nikonos V, I confess I haven't ever dived with it. Digital is so much easier underwater. And even my el cheapo P/S camera in a housing is capable of acceptable (to me) results in certain situations:





__________________
Nikon F3, Nikon F4, Nikon D700, Nikonos V
28/1.4 AFD, 24/2.8 AIS, 28/2.8 AIS, 50/1.4 AIS, 105/2.5 AIS, 70-210/4 AIS, 28-70/2.8 AFS, W-Nikkor 35/2.5, SB-600, Nikonos SB-105
Leica M2, Leica M3 SS, Leica IIIf
Zeiss ZM 28/2.8 Biogon, 35/2.0 Summicron, 50/2.0 Summicron DR, 135/2.8 Elmarit, VC 15/4.5 Heliar, Industar 26-M 55/2.8, VCII meter Fuji GA645Wi
Contax G2, Zeiss Biogon T* 28/2.8, Zeiss Sonnar T* 90/2.8
www.talexphoto.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-06-2012   #13
BobYIL
Registered User
 
BobYIL's Avatar
 
BobYIL is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by henryzwartz View Post
Hi RFF people,
I am planning on doing some underwater work along the Sydney coast.

This is my first foray into underwater photography, so I'm wondering what are some good starting option in terms of gear?

I am a student of limited funds, but with grand ambitions.

Henry
I think you will find some very interesting "things" to be afforded with a student budget here:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Q311...mpactgrouptest
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-06-2012   #14
henryzwartz
Registered User
 
henryzwartz is offline
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 10
Hi everyone,

Thank you all for your input and pointers, very useful as always. I will check out the options raised, I would try and get a Nikanos here in Australia, simply to save on postage for a 2 pound camera!

Cheers,

Henry
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:41.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.