| Photography General Interest Neat Photo stuff NOT particularly about Rangefinders. |
 |
Advice about traveling abroad with film |
 |
06-28-2012
|
#1
|
|
photomonkey
Chrisrw is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 165
|
Advice about traveling abroad with film
Greetings,
I am planning a trip to Mexico this fall and wanted to know the in and outs of traveling with film. I am fairly new to film shooting and don't want any shots to be ruined while going through airports, x-rays, etc...Any advice and/or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you all in advance,
Chris
|
|
|
|
06-28-2012
|
#2
|
|
packin' light
buzzardkid is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Assen, The Netherlands
Age: 42
Posts: 6,847
|
Here you go:
site: www.rangefinderforum.com x-ray airport film
into the Google search box and you got all the stories
__________________
Cheers, Johan
Leica II (1932), Elmars 50 & 135, Heliar 50: the nickel kit
Leica II (1942), Minifinder, Canon 28, W-Nikkor 35, Elmar 90: the chrome kit
Ricoh GXR Monochrom
Visit johanniels.com!
|
|
|
|
06-28-2012
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
ferider is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 10,288
|
These are my "travel rules", Chris, worked well so far:
- use 400 ASA and below
- always hand carry film, never check in; you can leave the film in your carry-ons when scanned.
- when in very warm climate, if possible, put film in fridge
No big deal really. Way over-discussed on the intertubes, also by people who rarely travel
Enjoy your trip !
Roland.
|
|
|
|
06-28-2012
|
#4
|
|
packin' light
buzzardkid is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Assen, The Netherlands
Age: 42
Posts: 6,847
|
__________________
Cheers, Johan
Leica II (1932), Elmars 50 & 135, Heliar 50: the nickel kit
Leica II (1942), Minifinder, Canon 28, W-Nikkor 35, Elmar 90: the chrome kit
Ricoh GXR Monochrom
Visit johanniels.com!
|
|
|
|
06-28-2012
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
anjoca76 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 419
|
There are many threads about this out there on the interwebs, but the basic gist of it is: anything above 400-speed film should be avoided--if they x-ray your film, and they likely will, film faster than 400 is at risk of fogging, which is not good. Best case scenario, you are polite and smile and ask nicely if they will inspect your film by hand, and they oblige. I've had success about 50% of the time with this. You increase your chances of avoiding x-rays by removing your film from all packaging and even the plastic canisters, and placing all film in a clear Ziploc bag.
I am sure many others here have far more travel experience than I, and they may offer variations on what I've said (or even disagree with me altogether), but that's how I've always traveled with film, and so far, so good.
Have fun!
__________________
Andy
Flickr
|
|
|
|
06-28-2012
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
anjoca76 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 419
|
Looks like others beat me to it!
__________________
Andy
Flickr
|
|
|
|
06-28-2012
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
uinku is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 107
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by anjoca76
Best case scenario, you are polite and smile and ask nicely if they will inspect your film by hand, and they oblige.
|
I've been pretty lucky with this so far, but travel mainly in Asia where airport security has generally better service. Also remember to thank them for their troubles since they are doing us a favour.
|
|
|
|
06-28-2012
|
#8
|
|
Sam I Am
yossarian123 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chicago
Age: 36
Posts: 595
|
I assume that ISO 400 film exposed at 1600 is OK?
|
|
|
|
06-28-2012
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
kevin_v is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 68
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by yossarian123
I assume that ISO 400 film exposed at 1600 is OK?
|
Actually, no. Anything that you treat as (push) above ISO 400 is at risk even if the film wasn't designed for above ISO 400.
__________________
With kind regards,
Kevin
--
CSci Major, Camera Doodler
|
|
|
|
06-28-2012
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Chuck Albertson is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 426
|
Never put film in checked luggage (if it gets scanned, the x-rays are much nastier than the checkpoint scanners they use for carry-on bags). Otherwise, don't worry about it--I routinely carry EI 3200 film on trips, and it survives several trips through the carry-on scanners without any ill effects.
|
|
|
|
06-28-2012
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
kokoshawnuff is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 564
|
Never had a problem asking for film to be hand checked, but I have one of those domke X-ray bags just in case they refuse.
|
|
|
|
06-28-2012
|
#12
|
|
coco frío
Pablito is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Salsipuedes
Posts: 2,987
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by yossarian123
I assume that ISO 400 film exposed at 1600 is OK?
|
Actually, yes, it's till 400 speed film, only it's underexposed.
|
|
|
|
06-28-2012
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
rizraz is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: kuala lumpur, malaysia
Posts: 197
|
I always asked for a hand check, not sure how is it over there but in Asia, the airports in Kuala Lumpur, Dhaka, Hong Kong and Saigon have been very accomodating the past two years when I request them with a smile........ I usually put the film cassettes, minus the box and plastic holder, in a clear plastic bag for them to go thru them faster.
|
|
|
|
06-28-2012
|
#14
|
|
photomonkey
Chrisrw is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 165
|
Thank you all for your replies and guidance. I think I'll be alright with the 400 ASA and a zip lock bag (maybe I'll throw in my Ilford 3200 just in case :-). I may do some research into buying film in Guanajuato while I am there. At least I could 1/2 the potential number of exposures to xrays. Hopefully I'll have some good pics t post from my travels.
|
|
|
|
06-28-2012
|
#15
|
|
photomonkey
Chrisrw is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 165
|
Thank you Roland. Simple and sound advice.
|
|
|
|
07-01-2012
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
locus is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 18
|
I travelled through India and Nepal in 2008. My film (tri-x 400 and fuji pro 160s) passed through hand luggage x-ray scanners maybe half a dozen times with no ill effect.
Ditch the boxes and carry your film in canisters in zip lock bags, it's just easier to carry that way.
I still have some rolls of unexposed film from the trip, which is now expired and was kept unrefrigerated. I shot a roll of the tri-x the other day and it turned out fine 
|
|
|
|
07-01-2012
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
zauhar is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,847
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by yossarian123
I assume that ISO 400 film exposed at 1600 is OK?
|
I was afraid of that, but I got back from Europe last week with 32 rolls, including a couple of Tri-X (aka Arista Premium) that I pushed to 1600. I developed these first, and the images look fine.
Don''t know if I was just lucky -
Randy
__________________
Philadelphia, PA
Leica M3/50mm DR Summicron/21mm SuperAngulon/
90mm Elmarit
Canon 7/50mm f1.4
Leica IIIf/Summitar/Collapsible Summicron
Yashica Electro 35
|
|
|
|
07-01-2012
|
#18
|
|
Registered User
Jimbot is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Newcastle Australia
Posts: 73
|
I have read a few of these "travel with film safety" threads now and haven't seen any reference to film safes like the Hama Film-Safe X. I note there is a passing reference to a Domke X-Ray bag above.
If this is often discussed, I apologise for missing it.
Any experience/views on these as a travel aid? If film is merely left in these safes in hand luggage when scanned, are they usually required to be removed and opened and, most importantly, do they work for all film speeds?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
07-02-2012
|
#19
|
|
Stewart McBride
Sparrow is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perfidious Albion
Age: 61
Posts: 9,715
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbot
I have read a few of these "travel with film safety" threads now and haven't seen any reference to film safes like the Hama Film-Safe X. I note there is a passing reference to a Domke X-Ray bag above.
If this is often discussed, I apologise for missing it.
Any experience/views on these as a travel aid? If film is merely left in these safes in hand luggage when scanned, are they usually required to be removed and opened and, most importantly, do they work for all film speeds?
|
I've used the Hama bag for years and no one has ever asked me to open it
There's a lot of talk on the web about xray damage, but I've never seen any photographic evidence
I've done sales-trips that would involve 10 or more flights without any damage and regularly take 1600 film off to Greece in the summer without problems
__________________
Regards Stewart
Stewart McBride
My  ... mostly the chaff ... these are a bit better ...
You’re only young once, but one can always be immature.
|
|
|
|
 |
07-02-2012
|
#20
|
|
Registered User
robdeszan is offline
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 8
|
I remember reading somewhere that the hand luggage xray machines should be safe up to 800iso as well. As an experiment I put 1600 iso neopan in hand luggage twice (in and out of the country, in Europe) to check for any ill effects and noticed no changes at all so usually I don't bother with hand check. I have carried high iso in my luggage since then and never got any negative effects.
I think I would be more cautious with multiple passes though and try to have them hand-checked if possible.
I definitely wouldn't bother with 400iso film and lower.
|
|
|
|
07-02-2012
|
#21
|
|
Registered User
Rayt is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,227
|
Is Fuji 1600 true iso 1600? Delta 3200 is iso 1000 and I have flown with it many times without ill effects.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 23:22. |
|
|