Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Leica M Film Cameras

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next

Old 06-27-2012   #9
Paul Luscher
Registered User
 
Paul Luscher is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 682
Quote:
Originally Posted by thegman View Post
I quite agree that 35mm film can deliver results similar to a full frame DSLR, and probably with better colour. I know that 35mm lenses, pound for pound tend to have more resolving power than medium format. However, I have a 6x9 medium format camera, which I guess has something along the lines of 9 times the film surface area of 35mm. A 35mm lens will resolve more, but nothing like enough to make up that difference.

Of course for your purposes, 35mm makes a whole lot more sense, but for mine as a wannabe Ansel Adams, MF or LF makes a sense too.

Entirely true. Because of course with a 6X9 negative you don't need to do much of a blow-up to produce a sizable picture with great detail.

But yeah, using a medium format camera in concert situations would likely make me very unpopular ( I've had my moments of negative feedback from audience and performers...even while using a Leica...) and might result in a lot of missed shots.

It's a matter of tradeoffs, I guess...
  Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 22:43.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.