Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Fixed Lens RF

Fixed Lens RF This forum is dedicated to the numerous and popular fixed lens rangefinders, including but not limited to the Canon Canonets, Konica III and S series, Minoltas, Ricohs, Vivitars, and so many others. Note fixed lens Olympus , Yashicas, Argus and Retina have separate forums.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Canonet QL17 - At Last!!
Old 06-26-2012   #1
aoresteen
Registered User
 
aoresteen's Avatar
 
aoresteen is offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 219
Canonet QL17 - At Last!!

I have finally gotten my abused Canonet QL17 back from repair after a 15 month wait. It had lots of interior water damage and a bad meter. I got it off eBay and of couse the seller had no idea that there was water damage. I can't recall exactly what I paid for it but it was in the $85 range.



While it was away being worked on I tracked down the scarce Canonet Hood 5 for it.

So I try to figure it out and nothing works. After puzzeling over it for 20 minutes I discover that there is no battery in it! So I have to order a new 625 alkaline battery (1.5v) for it (the meter was calibrated for a 1.5v battery). So it will be a few more days before I can run some film throught it.

It's a sold hefty camera. It's not a GIII but the earlier QL17. I hope the lens is as good as the reviews say.
__________________
Tony
______________________________________
If RD, IIIf RD M3-Mot M4-P Contax IIa BD Nikon SP 2005
Century Graphic 2x3 etc etc etc

De Oppresso Liber
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-26-2012   #2
Contarama
Registered User
 
Contarama is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 419
I regret giving mine away. The lens is fantastic with the right film. It will work without the battery. Check out Butkus for the manual...
__________________
Art is the ability to make something...even if it is a big mess...
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-26-2012   #3
visionlog
Registered User
 
visionlog is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1
Well, I love mine! It's a bummer that you paid 85 for one in such poor condition but at least it's okay now. Shame on that seller, though. Hopefully the repair people got it right and you'll get to enjoy years of service.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-26-2012   #4
Dwig
Registered User
 
Dwig's Avatar
 
Dwig is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Key West, FL, USA
Posts: 583
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoresteen View Post
I... It's not a GIII but the earlier QL17. I hope the lens is as good as the reviews say.
Although it doesn't seem to have been ever officially termed a G-anything, it is almost a G-III or perhaps a "early version G-III". The original generations were on a much larger, heavier chassis. I've owned one of these and a couple of "true" G-IIIs and expect you'll enjoy this one.

This one is a match to the "true" G-III (same body, lens, shutter) with only a few small differences. There is some difference in the meter, though the only external evidence is the battery check. Also there is no safety switch on the PC terminal. If a high voltage, old style electronic flash is connected via a PC cord the voltage is present at the hot shoe contacts. I nose or finger brushing the hot shoe under such conditions will be very uncomfortable. Modern flashes use low voltage sync circuits and with them it's not an issue.
__________________
----------
Dwig
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-26-2012   #5
venchka
Registered User
 
venchka's Avatar
 
venchka is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 67
Posts: 6,130
I was given a GIII in need of new seals and a CLA. $100 and change later it was working. I ran a roll of film through it. Sold it for $65. I guess I'm too picky.
Enjoy.

Wayne
__________________
Wayne
Deep in the darkest heart of the East Texas Rain forest.
Quote:
"Leave me alone, I know what I'm doing" K.R.
My Gallery
My Blog-Reborn
FlickrMyBookTwitSpaceFace
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-26-2012   #6
ebolton
Self Propelled
 
ebolton's Avatar
 
ebolton is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Hampshire, USA
Age: 55
Posts: 319
Hmmm, it should work fine without a battery, except for the meter. Be sure it fires on the manual aperature settings.

-Ed
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-26-2012   #7
aoresteen
Registered User
 
aoresteen's Avatar
 
aoresteen is offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 219
Thanks all. I was trying to check the meter that is why I said it wasn't working. It does work on manual.

I just may run some film through it using my hand held meter.
__________________
Tony
______________________________________
If RD, IIIf RD M3-Mot M4-P Contax IIa BD Nikon SP 2005
Century Graphic 2x3 etc etc etc

De Oppresso Liber
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-26-2012   #8
David Murphy
Registered User
 
David Murphy's Avatar
 
David Murphy is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Pasadena, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 2,384
I'd like to know who takes 15 months to repair a QL-17 - so I can avoid them! I've had more than one repaired in less than a week.
__________________
Contax IIa, Tanack IV-S, Canon L1, Leotax S, Kardon Civilian, Bessa R2S, Nikon S2, Leica, IIIa, Kalloflex, Kowa 6, Konica Autoreflex T, Canon Ftb QL, Pentax Spotmatic, Minolta SRT-101, Nikon F, Exakta VX

http://legacycamera.wordpress.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-26-2012   #9
gb hill
Registered User
 
gb hill's Avatar
 
gb hill is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North Carolina
Age: 53
Posts: 5,017
Living in Orlando you shouldn't have to order one. It's a common battery. Radio Shack & Batteries Plus has them.
__________________
flickr
Blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-26-2012   #10
btgc
Registered User
 
btgc's Avatar
 
btgc is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,756
I've never seen this hood before....Sigma DP2 have of similar shape, without cutout.
__________________
MyFlickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-27-2012   #11
farlymac
PF McFarland
 
farlymac is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 2,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Murphy View Post
I'd like to know who takes 15 months to repair a QL-17 - so I can avoid them! I've had more than one repaired in less than a week.
With as much water damage as the camera had, it probably took a while for the guy to track down all the parts to fix it. Which means buying another one to strip out, but not paying too much for it so that there is no profit in it. This is an earlier version of the G III, so there weren't as many made, and the internals are somewhat different.

PF
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-27-2012   #12
lam
Dave
 
lam's Avatar
 
lam is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 606
Great camera, I've picked up a few of these and all were great fun to use.
Esp. in black!
__________________
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-28-2012   #13
Mr_Flibble
Registered User
 
Mr_Flibble's Avatar
 
Mr_Flibble is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Lowlands
Age: 36
Posts: 2,455
I was given a GIII in the last X-mas give-away. It was missing a couple of screws, aperture blades were stuck.
Only thing I couldn't fix (yet) was the meter, but the camera worked fine in manual mode. Great lens too.

I'm sure the QL-17 will bring you plenty of joy now that it's in working order!
__________________
Rick - "If you're gonna shoot, shoot! Don't Talk"
Loaded with film: Kiev 88

Latest Toys: "Camera Exotica" photo book
Latest Activity: Geertruidenberg 800 Years festival
My Blog/Galleries
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-28-2012   #14
sanename
Registered User
 
sanename is offline
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4
I'm going to have a play with one that I found in my grandfather's closet this weekend.

What film would you suggest to have a go with?
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-01-2012   #15
Frontman
Registered User
 
Frontman is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: 東京日本
Posts: 1,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by btgc View Post
I've never seen this hood before....Sigma DP2 have of similar shape, without cutout.
Canon made two hoods of this type, the Canonet hood #4 and the #5. These hoods are hard to find, and often cost more than a good Canonet. The hood can be reversed and mounted on the lens for storage.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-01-2012   #16
Frontman
Registered User
 
Frontman is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: 東京日本
Posts: 1,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoresteen View Post
Thanks all. I was trying to check the meter that is why I said it wasn't working. It does work on manual.

I just may run some film through it using my hand held meter.
Remember that the meter will only work when the aperture is set to A. The QL17 is a shutter priority camera when used in Auto mode, and the shutter will not fire if the light is too bright or too dim for the selected shutter speed.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 19:39.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.