Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > Half Frames / Subminiatures

Half Frames / Subminiatures This forum is for all half frame 35mm cameras, including the very popular Olympus Pens and their SLR cousins, the Pen F and Pen FT, as well as all smaller than half frame subminiature film cameras.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 12-26-2011   #101
eurekaiv
Registered User
 
eurekaiv's Avatar
 
eurekaiv is offline
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 106
I got a Pen FT w/ 38 1.8 a few weeks ago and have since added a 25mm 2.8 and 50-90 zoom. I've managed to push one 36 roll through (72 shots takes awhile ) and I absolutely adore it. Here's a couple of my favorites... shot with expired but cold stored Fuji Pro 160S.


Fiberglass Opposites by eurekaiv, on Flickr


Man vs. Hose by eurekaiv, on Flickr
__________________
Sometimes I post my photos on flickr.
Sometimes I update my tumblr.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-26-2011   #102
Doug
Moderator
 
Doug's Avatar
 
Doug is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pacific NW, USA
Posts: 9,188
I see you are already having fun with your Pen! And congratulations on finding the faster 25mm; it's much less common than the f/4 25mm. Should be a very useful lens, and the 38 is excellent! It looks like "Man" is underexposed; I usually set my meter for ISO 100 with that film.
__________________
Doug’s Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-28-2011   #103
eurekaiv
Registered User
 
eurekaiv's Avatar
 
eurekaiv is offline
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 106
Yeah, I was kinda lucky on the 25mm. I found it a camera show and paid about what one might expect for the f4 variety.

As for the metering, thanks for the tip. I've only shot one other roll of that film and it exposed well at 160 (in a Nikon FG IIRC) so it's possible I didn't meter at all for that shot—just took the picture with whatever the previous settings were so I didn't miss it. I'm running a fresh roll of Solaris through it right now and I'm much more familiar with that film so I'll get a good idea of wether or not the meter is accurate.
__________________
Sometimes I post my photos on flickr.
Sometimes I update my tumblr.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-30-2011   #104
raytoei@gmail.com
Registered User
 
raytoei@gmail.com's Avatar
 
raytoei@gmail.com is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,870
hi...i am waiting for my Pen F to arrive.

one question for Pen F owners, what is the slowest hand-held speed that is reasonable ? Is this same like any SLR .... about 1/30 - 1/60 ?

thanks, i can't wait.
__________________
------------------------------------
Film is Photography.
------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-30-2011   #105
eurekaiv
Registered User
 
eurekaiv's Avatar
 
eurekaiv is offline
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 106
I shot a few pics at 1/30th with my 25 and 38 that came out fine. The thing is just so light and well balanced—it really feels steady in the hand at slower speeds. I recently tried a few shots at 1/15th and slower (though for the latter I was using some wall or post support) but I'm still away on xmas vacation and won't have a chance to process everything until I get back home this weekend.
__________________
Sometimes I post my photos on flickr.
Sometimes I update my tumblr.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-31-2011   #106
Zorkiiglaza
Registered User
 
Zorkiiglaza is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 125
I inherited a Ft from my late father-in-law. This camera has been stored in a box with other ignored cameras for 2 decades. I came upon this camera a few weeks ago and put a battery from my SP 35 in it and the meter sprang to life after 30 plus years. The meter is right on and its a great camera to play around with. My first roll of color print film was fantastic and the negatives sharp and contrasty. I thought it would be nice to have a wider angle than the 38 but am dismayed at the cost of the 20 and 25mm lenses. But still it is not really that much smaller than my M2.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1343'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-22-2012   #107
raytoei@gmail.com
Registered User
 
raytoei@gmail.com's Avatar
 
raytoei@gmail.com is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,870
Since Pen lens are quite expensive, I wonder if using a OM->Pen adapter, what lens are highly recommended ? I was checking out the 35/f2.8 and even the 28/f3.5. Are these lens much larger than the average pen lenses ?

thanks !

raytoei
__________________
------------------------------------
Film is Photography.
------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-22-2012   #108
eurekaiv
Registered User
 
eurekaiv's Avatar
 
eurekaiv is offline
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 106
I don't have any OM gear but maybe this helps...

Here's a pic of the Pen 25/2.8 (which is one of the larger pen primes—the 38/1.8 is about 2/3 its size) next to a Super-Takumar 50/1.4 which is a rather small 50/1.4.

__________________
Sometimes I post my photos on flickr.
Sometimes I update my tumblr.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-27-2012   #109
Sonnar2
Registered User
 
Sonnar2's Avatar
 
Sonnar2 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Germany
Age: 47
Posts: 1,414
..but with an M42 adapter the Takumar looks huge!
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-27-2012   #110
Tessar.
Registered User
 
Tessar. is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Age: 46
Posts: 73
The 25/2.8 pics from the one I had were really nice. Lovely rendering.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-25-2012   #111
raytoei@gmail.com
Registered User
 
raytoei@gmail.com's Avatar
 
raytoei@gmail.com is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,870
here is my pen FT...



here are some images from the first roll



But I must say, this camera is very very hard to focus indoors / evenings..

raytoei
__________________
------------------------------------
Film is Photography.
------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-26-2012   #112
zuiko85
Registered User
 
zuiko85 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 460
raytoe@, last month you asked about adapted OM mount lenses. I use them on my Pen F and they work fine. Of course the aperture operation is full manual, view at full aperture and then stop the lens down to the shooting aperture. The problem is finding a Pen F to OM adapter. They are not common and quite expensive, well north of $100. If you can get past that hurtle, you could be all set.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-06-2012   #113
raytoei@gmail.com
Registered User
 
raytoei@gmail.com's Avatar
 
raytoei@gmail.com is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,870
thanks zuiko85, i snagged one plus a 28/f2.8 om... here are some random shots...




ps. actually, i found that if i didn't mount the lens all the way,
the lens would still show the image at the widest aperture
instead of the shooting aperture.

pps. any comments on the m42 screwmount to Pen adapter ?

raytoei
__________________
------------------------------------
Film is Photography.
------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-06-2012   #114
Doug
Moderator
 
Doug's Avatar
 
Doug is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pacific NW, USA
Posts: 9,188
Quote:
Originally Posted by raytoei@gmail.com View Post
pps. any comments on the m42 screwmount to Pen adapter ?

raytoei
Ray congrats on your Pen FT; looks clean, hope it's as nice inside too! I have the Pentax M42 mount adapter. It has a flat front surface like most screw-mount Pentax bodies, without the annular groove found on the Spotmatic F and ES. So along with other earlier Pentax screw lenses the later SMCT lens's Auto/Manual switch will work properly for convenient switching from wide open for focus/compose, to stopped down for the exposure.

These adapters were more common than many other mounts, but still can be pricy and hard to find. I think mine came from KevinCameras, not the least expensive source for sure but he often has the stuff that others don't.
__________________
Doug’s Gallery
  Reply With Quote

PEN FT pictures
Old 04-07-2012   #115
OlympusRF
Registered User
 
OlympusRF is offline
Join Date: Jun 2009
Age: 37
Posts: 72
PEN FT pictures

Here's some photos of my kit, and some pictures taken with the 25mm f4 & the 100mm f3.5.).

  Reply With Quote

Old 04-07-2012   #116
flip
良かったね!
 
flip's Avatar
 
flip is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kobe, Japan
Posts: 1,226
In Japan, the most common adapters to source at the OM at around $120. The Nikon F adapters go up another 50%. M42 is not so common. I have seen the Leica one's regularly, but if it doesn't go to infinity or reduce my kit size.... no point.
__________________
Very happy with my Shintaro BP M2. Thanks!
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-22-2012   #117
raytoei@gmail.com
Registered User
 
raytoei@gmail.com's Avatar
 
raytoei@gmail.com is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,870


Kodak Plus-X pushed to iso 200,
Pen-FT on the 38/f1.8 lens
__________________
------------------------------------
Film is Photography.
------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-01-2012   #118
Erik van Straten
Registered User
 
Erik van Straten's Avatar
 
Erik van Straten is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,320
Olympus Pen FT, Zuiko 38mm f/1.8, Tmax100.

Amsterdam, 1989.

Erik.

  Reply With Quote

Old 11-05-2012   #119
Erik van Straten
Registered User
 
Erik van Straten's Avatar
 
Erik van Straten is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,320
Olympus Pen FT, Zuiko 38mm f/1.8, Tmax100.

Istanbul 1989.

Erik.

  Reply With Quote

Old 11-05-2012   #120
Erik van Straten
Registered User
 
Erik van Straten's Avatar
 
Erik van Straten is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,320
Olympus FT, Zuiko 38mm f/1.8, Tmax100.

Istanbul 1989.

Erik.

  Reply With Quote

Old 12-14-2012   #121
Erik van Straten
Registered User
 
Erik van Straten's Avatar
 
Erik van Straten is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,320
Olympus FT, Zuiko 38mm f/1.8, Tmax100.

Istanbul 1989.

Erik.

  Reply With Quote

40 1.8
Old 12-22-2012   #122
Film dino
David Chong
 
Film dino's Avatar
 
Film dino is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 589
40 1.8

Going back to the diptych theme.. (Edit-oops that should be 38/1.8)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Drobak_shop_diptych.jpg (45.0 KB, 14 views)

Last edited by Film dino : 12-22-2012 at 04:43. Reason: Correction
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-22-2012   #123
renekas
Registered User
 
renekas is offline
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 5
Have you guys tried the battery adapters that are supposed to lower the current from 1.55V to 1.35V ? There are some on ebay but i don't know if they are reliable, what do you think ? And how are the wein cells that do not contain mercury? I've heard they run out fast. What do you use?
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-30-2012   #124
TheHub
seeing things in B+W
 
TheHub's Avatar
 
TheHub is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 496
Quote:
Originally Posted by renekas View Post
Have you guys tried the battery adapters that are supposed to lower the current from 1.55V to 1.35V ? There are some on ebay but i don't know if they are reliable, what do you think ?
I use an adapter that takes one LR-44 battery. In both a Pen FT and Rollei 35 it has worked great.

edit: http://www.smallbattery.company.org....r9_adapter.htm <-- it looks like this
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-11-2013   #125
renekas
Registered User
 
renekas is offline
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 5
Does it really give you 1.35V on a 1.55V battery?

I got this one :http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1306460836...84.m1497.l2648

but it only reduces the current 0.1V, where as i need it reduced 0.2V on the SR43/386 battery.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:48.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.