Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > CSC : Compact System Cameras - > Micro 4/3 Cameras

Micro 4/3 Cameras This forum is for all Micro 4/3 cameras of any camera make.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

M to M43 adapter
Old 06-14-2012   #1
gilpen123
Gil
 
gilpen123's Avatar
 
gilpen123 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 2,182
M to M43 adapter

Has anyone here tried to use their M lenses with the OMD? What adapter brand are you using? How hard or easy is it to focus and expose? A sample shot with your chosen adapter will be great.
__________________
Gil

"Imagination is more important than knowledge"
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2012   #2
plummerl
Registered User
 
plummerl's Avatar
 
plummerl is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 60
Posts: 726
I'm happily using one from Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...ls_o00_s00_i00
It works great, so far. Exposure is no different from any other manual lens, focus is also quite easy (especially using the magnify function). This one is extremely cheap, Fotodiox also has a "pro" version, for twice the cost (at least by list price).
http://www.fotodiox.com/product_info...roducts_id=480
__________________
larry
My RFF Gallery
flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2012   #3
rogue_designer
Reciprocity Failure
 
rogue_designer's Avatar
 
rogue_designer is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 2,267
I use the Fotodiox pro mount for my sony Nex - they work quite well. Maybe not as well made as the $300 novoflex, but more that sufficient for my needs thus far.
__________________
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
Usually using: Canon P, Sony Nex 7, Canon 5D MkII, Horseman VHR, Horseman 45LX

---
My RFF Gallery | My Flickr | StreetLevel Photography
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2012   #4
gilpen123
Gil
 
gilpen123's Avatar
 
gilpen123 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 2,182
Thanks looking at Voigtlander but will check Fotodiox.
__________________
Gil

"Imagination is more important than knowledge"
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2012   #5
seakayaker1
Registered User
 
seakayaker1's Avatar
 
seakayaker1 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,185
I use the Voigtlander adaptor, great quality and no hesitation with recommending their use.

Good luck with your search and decision.
__________________
______________________

Life is Grand! ~~~ Dan
~ M9, M6 TTL & MP ~ Mamiya 7 II ~ GF1
~ Rolleiflex f3.5 with Carl Zeiss 75mm Planar (type 4) ~
The hardest part of starting a new project is starting it ~ Keith Carter
Flickr Sets: http://www.flickr.com/photos/26672618@N03/sets/
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2012   #6
bbrovold
Registered User
 
bbrovold's Avatar
 
bbrovold is offline
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 61
Yes, Voigtlander for me as well.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2012   #7
gilpen123
Gil
 
gilpen123's Avatar
 
gilpen123 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 2,182
Decided will order the Voigtlander. I've had several LTN to M and completely satisfied with the quality. Thanks.
__________________
Gil

"Imagination is more important than knowledge"
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2012   #8
plummerl
Registered User
 
plummerl's Avatar
 
plummerl is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 60
Posts: 726
Quote:
Originally Posted by gilpen123 View Post
Decided will order the Voigtlander. I've had several LTN to M and completely satisfied with the quality. Thanks.
Wow, that's $10 more than the price I paid for the Panasonic 14mm/f2.5. Not to mention exactly 10x the price of the adapter that I paid for.
__________________
larry
My RFF Gallery
flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2012   #9
biomed
WIIIIDE ANGLE
 
biomed's Avatar
 
biomed is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle Area (North)
Age: 66
Posts: 908
I use the Voigtlander adaptor. Not the least expensive, but very well made.
Mike
__________________
Biomed
Things are more like they are now than they’ve ever been before.

Photos

rff Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2012   #10
gilpen123
Gil
 
gilpen123's Avatar
 
gilpen123 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 2,182
Yes, $179 may be a bit expensive but don't want to try the cheapo's which might damage my OM mount in the longer term or worst my M lenses.

Quote:
Originally Posted by plummerl View Post
Wow, that's $10 more than the price I paid for the Panasonic 14mm/f2.5. Not to mention exactly 10x the price of the adapter that I paid for.
__________________
Gil

"Imagination is more important than knowledge"
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:36.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.