The MM at 1250 is superior, IMHO, to the M9 at 320.
The noise pattern of the MM, however, is to my eyes hardly "film-like", as claimed by Geoffrey in the second reader's response. Film noise is irregular and integrally informed by the contours of the image, which does not seem to be the case with the MM. The MM is obviously a great digital image-making tool.
Thanks for the link.
The old adage says: Seeing is believing
. To me, that doesn't mean that the world seen is the truth
, it means rather that seeing is a field in which the purity of heart is expressed
--or not, depending upon whatever happens to cloud that purity at any given moment.
No-immunity Bodies: DP Merrills, Fuji X-Pro1, Leica M-E. Too much dust made me immune to film T_T
my neglected flickr