| Canon RF For classic Leica Screw Mount Canon Rangefinders. |
 |
First Canonet Shots |
 |
05-14-2012
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Cold is offline
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 65
|
First Canonet Shots
|
|
|
|
05-14-2012
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
zb3 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 22
|
Nice,
My recently purchased canonet is in the shop getting a CLA and light seals. I do not have time right now to attempt the repair. Enjoy
|
|
|
|
05-14-2012
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
pinkarmy is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 540
|
i wish i made these shots. really.
|
|
|
|
05-14-2012
|
#4
|
|
PF McFarland
farlymac is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 2,207
|
Which model Canonet do you have? I used to have a QL17 (second version), and it took great shots. Friend of mine in PA has it now, and it still is operating fine.
PF
|
|
|
|
05-15-2012
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Cold is offline
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 65
|
Thanks guys (or girls, as the case may be!).
farlymac, it's a G-III. I absolutely love it. I got it from a guy who had it sitting in his garage for years, so it needed a bit of TLC: a good cleaning of the inside, cleaning out junked seals and replacing them with new ones, loosening up some nearly-frozen ISO and timer levers, and gently cleaning the lens, front and back.
One question I have though is to ask what you folks think might be responsible for the slight horizontal bars in the cloud shot, especially the lower 1/4 of the frame. Light leaks? Physical scratches? Processing?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
05-23-2012
|
#6
|
|
Polarock User
AZSunGod is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Age: 37
Posts: 39
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cold
Thanks guys (or girls, as the case may be!).
farlymac, it's a G-III. I absolutely love it. I got it from a guy who had it sitting in his garage for years, so it needed a bit of TLC: a good cleaning of the inside, cleaning out junked seals and replacing them with new ones, loosening up some nearly-frozen ISO and timer levers, and gently cleaning the lens, front and back.
One question I have though is to ask what you folks think might be responsible for the slight horizontal bars in the cloud shot, especially the lower 1/4 of the frame. Light leaks? Physical scratches? Processing?
|
For the cloud pic, is it a scan of a print or a negative? I've noticed on some of my print scans that I get bars like that if I don't have the scan resolution up to 600dpi (only on prints). I also use a Canonet QL17 G-III and love it!! I haven't used it in about 2 months, so I need to get some film and hit the streets 
|
|
|
|
 |
05-23-2012
|
#7
|
|
Hexaneur
kanzlr is offline
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vienna (Austria)
Age: 32
Posts: 803
|
looks like a scratched negative to me.
|
|
|
|
05-24-2012
|
#8
|
|
PF McFarland
farlymac is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 2,207
|
Most places I've gone to for developing, their scanners have problems with cloud photos. I think they have problems with blues and greens, as you can see some lines in the tree fungi photo. Do you know what type of machines they use? And where are you getting your developing done?
PF
|
|
|
|
05-25-2012
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Cold is offline
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 65
|
These were done at the local Ritz. Scanned by them (so I'm assuming a neg scan).
Scratched neg sounds most likely, and, in one way that's encouraging, and in another totally frustrating, as it means that while I'm not necessarily doing anything wrong, there's also nothing I can do to eliminate/mitigate it.
|
|
|
|
05-25-2012
|
#10
|
|
PF McFarland
farlymac is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 2,207
|
They don't look scratched to me (the lines would be white or a solid color if they were). It's just a matter of the scanner not being up to snuff. I think Ritz uses Fuji machines, like Walmart does. I quit going to Walmart after the second roll, and finding out they only offer one resolution (good for a 4x6 print). Someday I'll get my V-500 hooked up, and start doing my own scans.
PF
|
|
|
|
05-25-2012
|
#11
|
|
Rangefindered User
emayoh is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 123
|
Vey nice! Welcome to the world of Canonet! It's a brilliant camera.
Re the negative line: Get a good loupe -- good investment even if you dont scan yer own -- and look at the negative itself. You'll save yourself a lot of wondering about things like this.
|
|
|
|
05-25-2012
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Greyscale is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Fort Dodge Iowa
Age: 52
Posts: 2,141
|
See here for how to correct image banding in post-processing:
http://filmadvance.com/2011/10/how-t...om-your-scans/
It is likely caused by a poorly maintained, improperly calibrated, or dirty scanner, or the image not being scanned at a high enough resolution.
|
|
|
|
05-25-2012
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
pinkarmy is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 540
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by farlymac
They don't look scratched to me ...
|
don't know the exact cause but i agree they don't looks like physical scratches
why don't you ask for a re-scan? at least for that particular frame.
|
|
|
|
06-19-2012
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Cold is offline
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 65
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 18:07. |
|
|