|
View Poll Results: How often do you use a meter?
|
|
All/most of the time
|
 
|
162 |
44.38% |
|
more than half of the time
|
 
|
68 |
18.63% |
|
half of the time
|
 
|
35 |
9.59% |
|
less than half of the time
|
 
|
47 |
12.88% |
|
almost never
|
 
|
53 |
14.52% |
01-01-2012
|
#51
|
|
Registered User
bowieknife is offline
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 92
|
Whenever I shoot with an old meterless camera, I have a handheld meter ready. Something like the compact Gossen Sixtino, easily fits any pocket.
Most often I just take an incident light measure, and shoot with the choosen shutter/aperture combination as long as the light remains about the same.
No need outside to measure each subject individually, except when suddenly a cloud covers the sun etc, then of course I take a fresh reading.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
01-01-2012
|
#52
|
|
Registered User
zerobuttons is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Denmark
Posts: 300
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chriscrawfordphoto
Its pretty overpriced for what it is: a 50 year old design with very poor low-light sensitivity. For the same price, you can get a good modern digital meter that reads in much lower light, can read flash if needed, and is more accurate.
One of the modern Sekonic models that have built-in spotmeters as well as incident light metering are very good, and available for good prices used.
|
Since I have exactly the same thoughts as Seakayaker1, I have acquired a Sekonic L-398A Studio Deluxe III. I agree with Chris that itīs price tag may not be justified. On the other hand, people have owned these (previous versions) for decades and still use them, and the current version comes with a photo cell that ought to last even longer than the Selenium cell in the previous versions.
I chose to start out with the L-398A since I have not "grown up" with external light metering and wanted to learn things from scratch - and I like the fact that it doesnīt need a battery.
And to answer the OPīs question: always - so far with the cameraīs built-in meter.
|
|
|
|
 |
01-07-2012
|
#53
|
|
Registered User
kingqueenknave is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 158
|
Pretty often with the MP and M7. Never or almost never with the M2. I'm comfortable with the Sunny 16 rule. I look at the in-camera meter and frame lines as guides, never relying on them too much. Handheld meters aren't all that helpful for me as I tend to shoot outdoors and like to maintain a pretty quick pace.
|
|
|
|
01-07-2012
|
#54
|
|
Registered User
Jonathan Paul is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 11
|
I use a light meter every time I use film instead of digital. I get the best results that way.
|
|
|
|
01-24-2012
|
#55
|
|
Registered User
Oren Grad is offline
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 21
|
It depends. Almost always use the built-in meter in digital cameras, often use it in film cameras. With a meterless film camera I almost always just wing it - except for large format cameras, where I almost always use a meter.
It's important to add that I use only negative film. If I were shooting slide film I'd always be using a meter.
|
|
|
|
01-24-2012
|
#56
|
|
Registered User
cjbecker is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 132
|
All the cameras that I use, do not have built in light meters. I use a handheld for less then half the shots that I take. I meter at the beginning of the shoot and when the sun changes I meter again. I normally meter a couple times during a shoot. Im good at guestimating exposure.
|
|
|
|
01-24-2012
|
#57
|
|
Registered User
andredossantos is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 34
Posts: 1,444
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chriscrawfordphoto
I ALWAYS use a meter. Why bother guessing? I need my photos to come out perfectly, and guessing doesn't do that. Sometimes, it does, but that's luck, not consistency.
|
OTOH, being able to set exposure without a meter is very possible and in that case it is certainly not "guessing". I have a system that I've been using for several years that requires no meter and it works, even with slides. I rarely misjudge and blow an exposure in any light condition. Don't get me wrong, it took a whole lot of practice to get it down, just saying it's possible.
|
|
|
|
01-24-2012
|
#58
|
|
Registered User
cjbecker is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 132
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by andredossantos
OTOH, being able to set exposure without a meter is very possible and in that case it is certainly not "guessing". I have a system that I've been using for several years that requires no meter and it works, even with slides. I rarely misjudge and blow an exposure in any light condition. Don't get me wrong, it took a whole lot of practice to get it down, just saying it's possible.
|
Whats the system?
|
|
|
|
01-25-2012
|
#59
|
|
Registered User
andredossantos is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 34
Posts: 1,444
|
It's something I came up with myself. Im not even sure how to verbalized it and putting it in a post would take a long time.
Basically, I started with sunny 16 and came up with a way to extend it to any light condition.
|
|
|
|
01-26-2012
|
#60
|
|
Registered User
Cyriljay is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: London
Posts: 225
|
All my Cameras Have built-in meters which are very reliable . So I don't have any worries!
|
|
|
|
02-23-2012
|
#61
|
|
Registered User
mathiasprinz is offline
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 57
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit
I always use a meter unless I don't have time to... then I guess.
|
Thats my approach.
|
|
|
|
02-26-2012
|
#62
|
|
Marcelo
umcelinho is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sao Paulo
Age: 30
Posts: 1,294
|
why no "never" answer? 
__________________
Gear:
right eye
right index finger
cameras & lenses
What I've seen around: flickr
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
05-17-2012
|
#63
|
|
Registered User
c.poulton is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London
Age: 47
Posts: 720
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by seakayaker1
I use the meter in the M9, M6TTL, and MP, so it would be all/most of the time.
I am picking up a Rolliflex and do plan on purchasing a light meter. Was thinking about a Sekonic L-398A Studio Deluxe III, any thoughts?
|
I love my Studio Deluxe - paired with my M2 I am totally battery free - quite liberating when travelling to remote areas. (I have been caught out a few times with unavailability of batteries or spares that are dead when using a metered camera)
As regards low light - yes have to agree with Chris, it's not so good. I tend to increase the exposure by a stop or two indoors when it's very dark, depending upon the light, this usually works out OK.
When I had my IIIf a few years back I used to use sunny 16 all the time with fairly good results, however I now feel more comfortable using a hand held meter to check the exposure every now and then, or for difficult lighting conditions.
|
|
|
|
 |
05-18-2012
|
#65
|
|
Registered User
DGA is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Israel
Age: 39
Posts: 214
|
About half the time.
When shooting with my M6 outdoor I mostly use sunny 16, and when indoors I do one or two readings and shoot all frames accordingly, compensating if I feel it requires.
I use an external light-meter.
On digital, this is a different story, since the metering is there all the time.
__________________
"Photography is reality... the way I see it!"
Black M6TTL + M-Hexanons + Nokton 35/1.2
www.DotanGA.com
|
|
|
|
05-18-2012
|
#66
|
|
Registered User
Erik van Straten is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,322
|
I like to work without a meter. To think about the exposure gives me a kind of concentration on the picture.
Erik.
|
|
|
|
05-21-2012
|
#67
|
|
Registered User
swoop is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New York City
Age: 30
Posts: 1,584
|
I use the meter in my camera to give me an idea of exposure but never trust the thing.
I use a handheld meter whenever I use flash.
|
|
|
|
05-22-2012
|
#68
|
|
Registered User
jippiejee is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 593
|
I wished I were more hardcore, but I'm also insecure. So out there with my M4-P I usually use my meter to check my guestimates...
|
|
|
|
05-22-2012
|
#69
|
|
Registered User
Blanc is offline
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Brive la Gaillarde, France
Posts: 44
|
Well I'm mostly using my eyes and brain.
I use a meter for inside shots with continuous light or flashes, or when I really need some precise info (nightshots, churches...)
__________________
Camera tech specialized in rare weird and old gear overhaul. Fancy bellowmaker, crazy machinist. Be careful grumpy Frenchie 1hour per day at least...
http://www.atelierdeblanc.fr (I'll write an english section one day!)
|
|
|
|
05-23-2012
|
#70
|
|
Registered User
loquax ludens is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 678
|
Generally, I meter all the time, but not necessarily for each and every shot. If I'm shooting under unvarying lighting conditions, I meter then shoot until conditions change. If I'm shooting large format or portraits in any format, I'll meter every shot just because the results need to be spot on.
|
|
|
|
06-01-2012
|
#71
|
|
Registered User
Findus is online now
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 47
|
I usually meter - why waste precious film and/or ruin a good picture?  to be honest, i don't trust my guesstimates. Maybe if I stayed with one film only, i could learn to know it well enough, but I like to switch between various films/ISOs, and/or use filters.
Depending on the camera, I use the inbuilt meter or my handheld. I love old, mechanical cameras, many of which don't have a meter. Then I use either my Weimarlux Nova (old, simple, reliable and without battery) or my sekonic L 758 (reflective, incident and spot). Sometimes, I still manage to screw it up, though 
|
|
|
|
06-22-2012
|
#72
|
|
Registered User
venchka is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 67
Posts: 6,095
|
I shoot with an M5. 'Nuff said.
When I'm not shooting with the M5, I use a Gossen Luna-Pro sbc. 'Nuff said.
Poor exposures are always operator error. In my case.
Wayne
__________________
Wayne
Deep in the darkest heart of the East Texas Rain forest.
Quote:
|
"Leave me alone, I know what I'm doing" K.R.
|
My Gallery
My Blog-Reborn
FlickrMyBookTwitSpaceFace
|
|
|
|
06-22-2012
|
#73
|
|
Registered User
Spanik is offline
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 399
|
If you mean a hand-held light meter then about 90%, if you include build-in light meters then 100%. Why guess if you can measure 100% accurate? And those that say "sunny 16" I'd like to see them shoot slides without bracketing.
|
|
|
|
06-22-2012
|
#74
|
|
Registered User
bean_counter is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Chicago 'burbs
Posts: 324
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spanik
those that say "sunny 16" I'd like to see them shoot slides without bracketing.
|
My father did it for decades, shooting Kodachrome in a IIIf/Summitar. His GE meter died before I was born, and he never fixed or replaced. Sometimes a little overexposed, sometimes a little underexposed (especially late evening light), but he mostly nailed 'em.
I use a hand-held incident meter nearly all the time, reflective mode when called for, and usually in-camera meter for SLR tele work.
|
|
|
|
06-30-2012
|
#75
|
|
Registered User
Range-rover is offline
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 485
|
When I use the Nikon S2 about half the time, just to double check some tricky light
levels.
Range
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:39. |
|
|