Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Film vs Digital

Film vs Digital Discussions about the relative advantages and disadvantages of Film vs Digital are important as they can help us understand our choices as photographers. Each medium has strengths and weaknesses which can best be used in a given circumstance. While this makes for an interesting and useful discussion, DO NOT attack others who disagree with you. Forum rules are explained in the RFF FAQ linked at the top of each page.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Why don't you just switch to digital?
Old 05-08-2012   #1
seanbonner
Registered User
 
seanbonner is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 215
Why don't you just switch to digital?

My wife asked me that this morning, and it got me thinking, and I ended up writing an article about it which I thought I'd share here, assuming it might ring a bell with a few folks...

http://blog.seanbonner.com/2012/05/0...st-go-digital/
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2012   #2
Jobin
Registered User
 
Jobin's Avatar
 
Jobin is offline
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 212
Really enjoyed that read thank you.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2012   #3
efix
RF user by conviction
 
efix's Avatar
 
efix is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 705
+1 on the "made for a lifetime" argument. That's exactly the difference I feel between an M2 and an M8. Damn, I do have to get an M2 at some point ... but let's not make this another GAS thread ...
__________________
"In my humble estimate, there’s a huge lack of appreciation out there for the wonderful aesthetic look that film of all types can lend to an image. Sadly, that doesn’t seem to count in a world that is rushing nowhere like a lot of headless chickens." – Jonathan Eastland
blog | facebook | twitter | flickr! | 500px
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-09-2012   #4
Speedfreak
-
 
Speedfreak is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 227
Quote:
It might take me a month to go through a roll of film.
At that pace you are not really helping film staying in business...
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-09-2012   #5
kmallick
Registered User
 
kmallick is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 524
You echo a lot of our's sentiments. Thanks for putting it in words. Excellent read.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-09-2012   #6
Teuthida
-
 
Teuthida is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 648
Nice read. Well done. While I have no truck with digital, i respect anyone who prefers film for idiosyncratic reasons instead of some large philosophical point.

I love to shoot film too, for many of the same reasons you cite. But I dob't think its inherently "better" than digital as a medium.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-09-2012   #7
shadowfox
Personal Photography
 
shadowfox's Avatar
 
shadowfox is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,573
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedfreak View Post
At that pace you are not really helping film staying in business...
Of course not.
Film is not going to be "saved" by a single individual's consumption volume.

But he chose to invest his time to write about film to inspire others.

More useful than pointing out the obvious, no?
__________________
Have a good light,
Will


  Reply With Quote

Old 05-09-2012   #8
pieter
Registered User
 
pieter is offline
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 78
I like the "made for a lifetime" argument. I am still debating whether to buy a m6 or a m9 and this is my main worry about the m9. It seems useless to buy such an expensive camera if it's not a lifetime purchase.
But then again, the question will be how much of my lifetime will film stay a valid option? Will a m6 really be as handy to have in 30 years? Will I have to buy film rolls from expensive retro labs? Will it become as hard then to use 35mm film as some obscure ancient long dead picture taking device has become now? I dont doubt it will always be possible, but at what cost of money and time?
With some repairs once in a while the m9's usb cable might find more connection with the world of 2050 than the filmroll of the m6 will. Maybe a camera is only as durable as it's connection.

I only wish the m9 itself was built as durable as the m6, but I guess with the amount of cutting edge technology in the device that would be impossible.

Basically I'm still on the fence. Thanks for your thoughtprovoking article.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-09-2012   #9
seanbonner
Registered User
 
seanbonner is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 215
Thanks everyone. Yeah, for the last many years I've been shooting on a K1000 and while it's now sitting in a box and unused for many years, it still works perfectly today, same with the M2 that I just moved to the M7 from. I debated M6 vs M7 for a while, I really wanted internal metering and decided if I was going to make the upgrade for something to help me think less about the camera and more about the photo, I thought I might as well have the AE option as well.

I'm not trying to save the film industry, like vinyl records (or Polaroids) I think there will always be a market and while it might get more pricey, it'll always be around. I'm not even saying film is better than digi, it's just what I like personally.

Anyway, thanks a ton for checking it out!
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-16-2012   #10
Calvito
Registered User
 
Calvito is offline
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 14
Nice read, thanks :-)
I sent a link to the fellow members of my photography group to read...
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-17-2012   #11
sara
B/W
 
sara's Avatar
 
sara is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Age: 26
Posts: 290
Posting on my FB and Twitter!
__________________
Photoblog | flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-17-2012   #12
damien.murphy
Damien
 
damien.murphy is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Waterford, Ireland
Age: 34
Posts: 515
For me, nothing comes close to the the enjoyment and pleasure of shooting with my M3. When digital can offer me a shooting experience as pleasurable, then I may shoot digital exclusively. For now though, I will remain shooting both film and digital, and actually started with digital. The ideal combination for me, would be a marriage of the pleasure of shooting with a simple film camera (gorgeous viewfinder, minimal controls, etc) with the convenient output of digital. For now those that offer both are either out of my price league (M9), or carry more combined risk and cost that I am comfortable with (M8, R-D1).

Unfortunately the more things roll on, the more complex and fussy cameras seem to get, and that removes the minimalistic pleasure I get from the film cameras I choose to shoot. Stunning viewfinder, shutter speed dial, aperture controls, iso controls and well built body, how hard is it for camera companies..
__________________
Damien
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-17-2012   #13
damien.murphy
Damien
 
damien.murphy is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Waterford, Ireland
Age: 34
Posts: 515
Great post by the way, you've really captured a key part of the film experience for many people, I think. Limitless menu options, the capacity to take hundreds or thousands of shots, and the ability/ temptation to review each shot after you've taken it, all distract me from focussing solely on the scene/ whats happening around me. Something like an M, or manual film camera, cuts away all those superfluous distractions for me, enabling me to focus on whats around me, where I choose to stand and when I choose to push the button.


Call me crazy, but I would love a digital camera without an lcd. That would solve the temptation to instantly review every shot, and fiddle with settings, in one fell swoop. Not sure how to deal with the infinite capacity of memory cards, but you could force yourself to use lower capacity cards (something which is far easier to do than resist the allure of that lcd..).
__________________
Damien
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-17-2012   #14
loquax ludens
Registered User
 
loquax ludens's Avatar
 
loquax ludens is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 683
Great article Sean. What you wrote resonates with me.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-21-2012   #15
chopsteeks
Registered User
 
chopsteeks is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3
hahahaha....give him some credit for at least 1 film a month...

nice blog btw...

Like others have stated, digital caused some sort of disconnect, passion has disappeared...

Digital made made it easier to capture images, lots of them, but upon reviewing these images....it does not give me feeling that I was even there...

So....back to film.....enjoying photography again.

Slow --- yes...I cherish the slow process....to the point I have gone back to resurrecting my 4x5 outfit.

Funny story ---- One morning, I hiked to a popular lake...a young couple approached me with some fancy DSLR ----- asked me how big of a memory card I use with my strange looking outfit.....hahahahahaha.....I felt so outdated...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedfreak View Post
At that pace you are not really helping film staying in business...
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 21:34.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.