Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Digital Rangefinder Cameras > Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M"

Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M" Discussions about the Leica M8 /M 8.2 / M9 / M9-P/ M-E / M Monochrom / M10 aka "M": Leica digital M mount rangefinder cameras. Naming the new digital M the "Leica M" is VERY unfortunate as it will only confuse newbies with other Leica M cameras of the the past. Happily there is room for confusion with only the past 59 years of Leica M production ... since Leica introduced the Leica M system in 1953. All Hail for the Leica Marketing Department learning Leica M history!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 05-11-2012   #176
Keith
Registered User
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Keith is online now
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 15,476
The trouble is that we all know Leica's idea of a mid level camera would still be something that's going to be a financial leap for the average consumer.

I don't have a problem with Leica personally as I don't with Mercedes or BMW ... these are items that aren't made for the average income earner, it's a fact of life that us bottom feeders have to deal with!
__________________
---------------------------
zenfolio
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #177
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,744
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
The trouble is that we all know Leica's idea of a mid level camera would still be something that's going to be a financial leap for the average consumer.
No doubt about it, but a $3000-4000 camera still seems more, and I cannot believe I'm saying this, reasonable. We're creeping steadily towards $10,000 for Canon's, Nikon's, and Leica's top 35mm digital camera.

Quote:
I don't have a problem with Leica personally as I don't with Mercedes or BMW ... these are items that aren't made for the average income earner, it's a fact of life that us bottom feeders have to deal with!
The average income earner in each of our countries can afford one if they really want it... it would just take some sacrifices. There are many countries where the average income can never ever dream of owning a $10,000 camera. We are still lucky even if we cannot continue to buy luxury cameras.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #178
Keith
Registered User
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Keith is online now
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 15,476
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit View Post
The average income earner in each of our countries can afford one if they really want it... it would just take some sacrifices. There are many countries where the average income can never ever dream of owning a $10,000 camera. We are still lucky even if we cannot continue to buy luxury cameras.

That's it exactly .... these things aren't quite out of reach but they do require a level of sacrifice. Most people can afford to own an M9 if they're prepared to drive a two thousand dollar car and make other decisions about what they really need to get by!
__________________
---------------------------
zenfolio
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #179
DRabbit
Registered
 
DRabbit's Avatar
 
DRabbit is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 739
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit View Post
No doubt about it, but a $3000-4000 camera still seems more, and I cannot believe I'm saying this, reasonable. We're creeping steadily towards $10,000 for Canon's, Nikon's, and Leica's top 35mm digital camera.
I know... the $3-4K thing seems hard to swallow, but at least it feels more within reach. An M8-3 at $4K... at least I could sell some gear, save my pennies and have one in six months. $8K and above, that's like "oh yeah, when I win the lottery" or "let me sell my car..." LOL


Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit View Post
The average income earner in each of our countries can afford one if they really want it... it would just take some sacrifices. There are many countries where the average income can never ever dream of owning a $10,000 camera. We are still lucky even if we cannot continue to buy luxury cameras.
Very true -- and good to keep perspective. The fact we can even discuss this, likely from nice laptops and computers on high-speed connections from the comfort of home, makes us lucky.
__________________
Amy
Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep.

The Dang Gallery on DangRabbit - Follow me on Twitter - on Facebook - Google+
Leica M8 - Zeiss Ikon - Olympus E-PM1 -Yashica 635 - Pentax K5 - FujiX100 - a Holga and a couple of Polaroids
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #180
Audii-Dudii
Registered User
 
Audii-Dudii is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michel154 View Post
some one could send there M8 to have it converted to black and white
nothing new... this guy have been doing it for years
http://www.maxmax.com/b&w_conversion.htm
Maybe, maybe not. I don't know whether they can convert an M8 or not, but I was in communication with them just last week about the possibility of converting my X-Pro1 to pure B&W and they said that while they're happy to give it a shot, the cost will run between $1,500 and $2,500, depending upon how much work is involved, and there is a good chance they'll ruin a sensor or three while figuring out how to remove the color filter layer from the X-Pro1 chip, as they haven't worked with one of them yet.

If they could guarantee the price would be $2,500, I would be tempted to have mine converted, but I imagine the cost of a replacement sensor will approach the cost of the body, and as such, destroying even one of those will ultimately push the pricetag a bit too high for my comfort.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #181
DRabbit
Registered
 
DRabbit's Avatar
 
DRabbit is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 739
Quote:
Originally Posted by Audii-Dudii View Post
Maybe, maybe not. I don't know whether they can convert an M8 or not, but I was in communication with them just last week about the possibility of converting my X-Pro1 to pure B&W and they said that while they're happy to give it a shot, the cost will run between $1,500 and $2,500, depending upon how much work is involved, and there is a good chance they'll ruin a sensor or three while figuring out how to remove the color filter layer from the X-Pro1 chip, as they haven't worked with one of them yet.

If they could guarantee the price would be $2,500, I would be tempted to have mine converted, but I imagine the cost of a replacement sensor will approach the cost of the body, and as such, destroying even one of those will ultimately push the pricetag a bit too high for my comfort.
VERY interesting. I'd be more tempted to try it with one of the much cheaper Olympus Pens... like this:
http://maxmax.com/olympus_e-p2.htm
__________________
Amy
Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep.

The Dang Gallery on DangRabbit - Follow me on Twitter - on Facebook - Google+
Leica M8 - Zeiss Ikon - Olympus E-PM1 -Yashica 635 - Pentax K5 - FujiX100 - a Holga and a couple of Polaroids
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #182
Lss
Registered User
 
Lss is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobYIL View Post
What the majority M shutter counts show in one year, some real professionals do in ONE day..
Don't you mean all real professionals?
__________________
Lasse
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-12-2012   #183
Araakii
Registered User
 
Araakii is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 524
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit View Post

The average income earner in each of our countries can afford one if they really want it... it would just take some sacrifices. There are many countries where the average income can never ever dream of owning a $10,000 camera. We are still lucky even if we cannot continue to buy luxury cameras.
Very glad to finally hear something like this. The glass is always half full and you really got to know when to be satisfied.
__________________
My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-12-2012   #184
Araakii
Registered User
 
Araakii is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 524
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
When was the last time you saw any digital M in our classifieds with a high shutter count ... the majority of them seem to have 10,000 or less ... people don't shoot them like Nikons or Canons by rule. They buy the damned things, molly coddle them until they get bored with them and then move them on for the next incarnation of their photographic fantasies!
When did shutter count become a measure of photographic excellence? If that was the case, the old guy with trembling hands that takes 8 frames per second at 1/500 must be the best in the world.
__________________
My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-12-2012   #185
print44
Registered User
 
print44 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 771
Imagine this was the first Leica. Great! Such exquisite quality. And then a few years down the line someone comes along and invents the M3. A monochrom Leica that can do colour as well!
__________________
James
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:31.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.