12-13-2011
|
#276
|
|
... likes film.
maddoc is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 調布市
Age: 47
Posts: 6,452
|
PORTRA400 @250ISO
 |
|
|
|
|
12-13-2011
|
#277
|
|
Registered User
menos is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 2,208
|
Gabor, is that cool colors or what ?
Well seen!
|
|
|
|
|
12-13-2011
|
#278
|
|
... likes film.
maddoc is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 調布市
Age: 47
Posts: 6,452
|
Thanks, Dirk !! 
I followed the tip to rate this film @ 250ISO ... it helped ! |
|
|
|
|
12-13-2011
|
#279
|
|
Registered User
Penzes is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Netherlands
Age: 41
Posts: 375
|
Gabor, lower ISO, but the standard development times?
|
|
|
|
|
12-13-2011
|
#280
|
|
... likes film.
maddoc is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 調布市
Age: 47
Posts: 6,452
|
Istvan, yes because it is lab-processed C41 color film, 3:15 at 38C (from memory).
|
|
|
|
|
12-13-2011
|
#281
|
|
Registered User
menos is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 2,208
|
Gabor, is this the same film as Kodak Portra400 in 120 size?
I just bought a few rolls for tryouts and will run it on the weekend.
Your shot doesn't look like midday sun, but rather slightly dim light.
Is rating Portra400 lower valid for all lighting conditions?
|
|
|
|
|
12-13-2011
|
#282
|
|
... likes film.
maddoc is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 調布市
Age: 47
Posts: 6,452
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by menos
Gabor, is this the same film as Kodak Portra400 in 120 size?
I just bought a few rolls for tryouts and will run it on the weekend.
Your shot doesn't look like midday sun, but rather slightly dim light.
Is rating Portra400 lower valid for all lighting conditions?
|
From my experience a little overexposure does not do bad on C41 films and my first roll of this film (The new PORTRA400) rated @ 400ISO did not have very nice colors but some nasty color cast. |
|
|
|
|
12-24-2011
|
#283
|
|
Registered User
Penzes is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Netherlands
Age: 41
Posts: 375
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-26-2012
|
#284
|
|
Registered User
21-135 Apo All Good is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 119
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by menos
Gabor, is this the same film as Kodak Portra400 in 120 size?
I just bought a few rolls for tryouts and will run it on the weekend.
Your shot doesn't look like midday sun, but rather slightly dim light.
Is rating Portra400 lower valid for all lighting conditions?
|
Sorry to but-inski, but the answer to your question is YES, especially if using the older NC version, as in Portra 400 NC. No one I know rates this any higher than 320 and it likes over-exposure and will yield fantastic colors with neutral color and good saturation.
Ditto for 160 NC, we all rate that at 100-125 max.
__________________
Dad always said, "The camera merely holds the film flat and lets the shutter expose it for a fraction of a second. It's the LENS that takes the Picture"! Dad is still right!
|
|
|
|
|
02-02-2012
|
#285
|
|
Registered User
sazerac is offline
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: 817
Posts: 293
|
I had to rate the Tri-X at 1600 and hold 1/30 to get this shot wide open. man, I'm really liking this lens...
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
02-02-2012
|
#286
|
|
Truth is beauty
Juan Valdenebro is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Barcelona and Colombia
Age: 41
Posts: 4,012
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by menos
Gabor, is this the same film as Kodak Portra400 in 120 size?
I just bought a few rolls for tryouts and will run it on the weekend.
Your shot doesn't look like midday sun, but rather slightly dim light.
Is rating Portra400 lower valid for all lighting conditions?
|
Some years ago I did test color negative film, Portra and Ektar if I remember well...
I found for soft light (overcast or shades on a sunny day) best exposure was at box speed with incident metering.
When there's direct sun and it's behind camera or close to that, best exposure was +1 from box speed, incident metering too.
And if the direct sun was not behind camera but coming to the subject from the side, say when a girl looks to camera and the sun hits just a half of her face, the best exposure was +2 from box speed, incident metering too, with the hemisphere into the direct sun and aiming at camera...
That makes, for Ektar, 1/250 f/8 1/2 for direct sun behind camera, and 1/250 f/ 5.6 1/2 for side direct sun.
Cheers,
Juan
__________________
F i l m means fun!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
02-27-2012
|
#287
|
|
Registered User
Cyriljay is online now
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: London
Posts: 225
|
I too own Summicron 90mm asp and not my favourite lens as it is big and heavy. I used it hardly as I go for my general day to day use of my 50mm 0r 35mm Cron. But 90 mm undoubtedly a better lens in right use for in it perspective.  |
|
|
|
|
04-15-2012
|
#288
|
|
Registered User
kiemchacsu is offline
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Hanoi, Vietnam
Age: 32
Posts: 176
|
Seems that this 90 CRON lens is not that popular here, look what happened: the post right before mine was 2 months ago already
1111_28_HN_HG_fomapan by kiemchacsu, on Flickr |
|
|
|
|
04-15-2012
|
#289
|
|
Registered User
matt335 is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 443
|
I agree let's open this stream up again.
This one is on tri-x.
 |
|
|
|
|
04-15-2012
|
#290
|
|
Registered User
matt335 is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 443
|
This one has been cropped, tri-x 1600asam Phil Slater w/ Matt MacMahon in background @ Basement/Sydney
 |
|
|
|
|
Goodbye Blue Sky |
|
|
04-24-2012
|
#291
|
|
Registered User
TheGodParticle is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 508
|
Goodbye Blue Sky
|
|
|
|
|
The path less taken |
|
|
04-24-2012
|
#292
|
|
Registered User
TheGodParticle is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 508
|
The path less taken
Last edited by TheGodParticle : 04-24-2012 at 01:22.
Reason: wrong sized image
|
|
|
|
|
05-09-2012
|
#293
|
|
Registered User
TheGodParticle is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 508
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-09-2012
|
#294
|
|
Jordan Dickinson
slantface is offline
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Age: 31
Posts: 511
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kiemchacsu
Seems that this 90 CRON lens is not that popular here, look what happened: the post right before mine was 2 months ago already
1111_28_HN_HG_fomapan by kiemchacsu, on Flickr |
really dig this. Just a great look to this in terms of processing, focus, and the repetitive pattern of the field in contrast to her face. |
|
|
|
|
05-09-2012
|
#295
|
|
Hausen
hausen is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Auckland
Posts: 700
|
__________________
David
Auckland, NZ
Far too many cameras & lenses!
|
|
|
|
|
05-09-2012
|
#296
|
|
Registered User
drew.saunders is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 210
|
I just picked up a c. 1970 one from Keh in "BGN" condition at a good price that definitely looks like it's spent a lot of time in a camera bag without an excess of padding, but it's optically and mechanically fine, so I'm happy with it. I tested it, mostly wide open at f/2, and this one turned out nice, even though I didn't quite get anything exactly in proper focus:
 |
|
|
|
|
05-10-2012
|
#297
|
|
~
peter_n is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 9,127
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGodParticle
|
Nice one...
|
|
|
|
|
05-10-2012
|
#298
|
|
~
peter_n is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 9,127
|
M2, 90 Summicron pre-ASPH E55, APX 100.
|
|
|
|
|
06-23-2012
|
#300
|
|
平和、愛、喜び
Vincent.G is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Age: 35
Posts: 984
|
Click the Share tab above your photo, then grab bb code of the size you want, copy and paste them here. Very easy!
__________________
My Flickr
Celebrating what's right with the world on film.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 14:12. |
|
|
