Leica+Fuji?
Old 05-06-2012   #1
Tomas M
Registered User
 
Tomas M is offline
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 26
Leica+Fuji?

Not sure if this has been posted yet, but I was just looking on the Fuji site when I saw this banner:



X mount 35mm on the way? If I wasn't so bad with money, I'd be saving for it right now
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #2
Matthieu
Registered User
 
Matthieu's Avatar
 
Matthieu is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 44
Is that the adapter in the upper right corner? Why would it need those electronic contacts?
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #3
Archlich
Registered User
 
Archlich is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthieu View Post
Is that the adapter in the upper right corner? Why would it need those electronic contacts?
6-bit code reader might it be?
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #4
mabelsound
actually a dude
 
mabelsound's Avatar
 
mabelsound is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 44
Posts: 5,245
Oh wow. If fuji's adapter is going to have six-bit contacts, that could be very interesting.
__________________
photoblog, flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #5
gavinlg
Registered User
 
gavinlg's Avatar
 
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,777
omg.


What on earth are they up to? Are they actually going to make this M mount adapter thing work properly?
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #6
t6un
Registered User
 
t6un is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 151
Using the optical codes may still be protected by a patent, so I'm hoping that the contacts are for the distance sensor. And that the next revision of the camera has some (more) use for them.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #7
mabelsound
actually a dude
 
mabelsound's Avatar
 
mabelsound is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 44
Posts: 5,245
The image suggests to me that perhaps they have actually licensed the technology from Leica. It could certainly benefit both companies.
__________________
photoblog, flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #8
crispy12
Registered User
 
crispy12's Avatar
 
crispy12 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 288
Oh wow, this is interesting.
__________________
flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #9
dcsang
Canadian & Not A Dentist
 
dcsang's Avatar
 
dcsang is online now
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Toronto Canada
Age: 48
Posts: 4,661
This would make a lot of sense - The Kipon adapter, while it works just fine imho, is still "just the Kipon adapter" - that is, since Fuji is making an M-mount adapter (we all knew this when the camera was announced) it would have to have some other benefits to it otherwise the Kipon adapter would just be the "Fuji" adapter but likely less expensive.

What I mean by this is; Fuji's m-mount adapter will likely cost a bit more money than the Kipon currently is priced at. Even now there's a knock off of the Kipon adapter floating around on Ebay at even less money than Kipon's are priced at! So, Fuji has to bring to the table something else other than the basic adapter - don't know what that will be but it's clear it will be something that may warrant people dumping the third party adapters to head towards Fuji's version.

Cheers,
Dave
__________________
I own a Leica and I am NOT a dentist (I don't even portray one on TV!!!)

I have an idea what I'm looking for but it only becomes real once I see it - Constantine Manos

ITS THE MAGIC I SEE IN THE Light, Texture, & Tone
that Intoxicates Me - Helen Hill

My Flickr - it's where I post my RF and P&S shtuff
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #10
j.scooter
Registered User
 
j.scooter's Avatar
 
j.scooter is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Toronto-ish
Posts: 593
I always was under the impression that Fuji's adapter was going to be "smart". If it was just a block of metal that was a mount for M lenses, I am certain it would have been released a long time ago.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #11
robert blu
quiet photographer
 
robert blu's Avatar
 
robert blu is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Italy
Age: 65
Posts: 2,878
Short time ago I read (don't remember where) that Fuji is planning to position itself at same level of the 2 biggest japanese camera producers. Probably they cannot (or do not desire) compete on the same playground where competitors are already more or less well established and therefore they try an innovative way, a modern no rf no reflex camera, innovative sensor etc etc. Following this logic an "innovative" adapter like a smart adapter could be in the logic, which could also be the reason for which it took time to engineer and produce it.
Just my opinion, anyway even if I do not own an xpro1 (yet?) I'm sparing some money for a possible purchase...
robert
__________________
Remember: today is the Day !
from Ruth Bernhard recipe for a long and happy life


my quiet photographer's blog


My RFF photos and my albums on RFF
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #12
willie_901
Registered User
 
willie_901's Avatar
 
willie_901 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,876
The electrical contacts are a great tease. So is not showing about 60% of the ring.

I think I'm going to vote the contacts are for a focus cam interface.
__________________
"Perspective is governed by where you stand object size and the angle of view included in the picture is determined by focal length." H.S. Newcombe

Self-Induced Transparency Photography, FLICKR, Professional Portfolio.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #13
dct
Registered User
 
dct's Avatar
 
dct is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Zurich
Posts: 1,092
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcsang View Post
:
:
What I mean by this is; Fuji's m-mount adapter will likely cost a bit more money than the Kipon currently is priced at. Even now there's a knock off of the Kipon adapter floating around on Ebay at even less money than Kipon's are priced at! So, Fuji has to bring to the table something else other than the basic adapter - don't know what that will be but it's clear it will be something that may warrant people dumping the third party adapters to head towards Fuji's version.

Cheers,
Dave
Still my expectations! Together with an intelligent adapter Fuji could offer one or more of these half-baked ideas- Of course most of it requires a software update:
  • EVF focus assist (peak? other?)
  • menu item storing a few lens EXIF data like: LensMake, LensModel, LensInfo, FocalLength...
  • knowing the FocalLenght could reset the OVF frame lines to the correct displacement
  • focussing cam readout?
  • knowing the manual focus lens position could lead to well... at least interesting possiblities, having also the metered AF distance of a selected AF point to compare with...

Ok, I stop dreaming. At least I keep quiet!
__________________
photos
RFF gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #14
f16sunshine
Moderator
 
f16sunshine's Avatar
 
f16sunshine is online now
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 3,898
( 1 color ) ???
__________________
Andy
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #15
Griffin
Grampa's cameras user
 
Griffin's Avatar
 
Griffin is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Rotterdam
Posts: 499
Exciting indeed. This is like Nintendo going 16-bit type exciting.
__________________
flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #16
FrozenInTime
Registered User
 
FrozenInTime is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 1,221
Quote:
Originally Posted by willie_901 View Post
I think I'm going to vote the contacts are for a focus cam interface.
If they do that I'm selling my GXR
__________________
It's the weird colour scheme that freaks me. Every time you try to operate one of these weird black controls, which are labeled in black on a black background, a small black light lights up black to let you know you've done it.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #17
robert blu
quiet photographer
 
robert blu's Avatar
 
robert blu is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Italy
Age: 65
Posts: 2,878
...and this thread only a few days before the 10th of M
robert
PS: I'm still saving for a ...not sure what !
__________________
Remember: today is the Day !
from Ruth Bernhard recipe for a long and happy life


my quiet photographer's blog


My RFF photos and my albums on RFF
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #18
jsirevaag
Registered User
 
jsirevaag's Avatar
 
jsirevaag is offline
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by f16sunshine View Post
( 1 color ) ???
Black. The camera only comes in Black.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #19
scho
Registered User
 
scho's Avatar
 
scho is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ithaca, NY
Age: 77
Posts: 335
We need to see the lens side of the adapter. I'd also guess (probably wrong) that there will be 6 bit coding.
__________________
Gear: Leica M-E, Sigma DP3M, Ricoh GXR-M, Contax G2, Rolleiflex 2.8F.

TheDailySnap
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #20
Tomas M
Registered User
 
Tomas M is offline
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by willie_901 View Post
The electrical contacts are a great tease. So is not showing about 60% of the ring.

I think I'm going to vote the contacts are for a focus cam interface.
This would be absolutely amazing. With the fuji 35 and it's aperture chatter and slow focus, this will be a life saver.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #21
JHutchins
Registered User
 
JHutchins's Avatar
 
JHutchins is offline
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Juneau, Alaska
Posts: 101
I don't think that can be six bit coding, can it? It's an optical system and those look like electrical contacts...

I'm curious.

Edited to say -- oh, but that's the camera side -- I guess it could have a reader on the lens side & translate that to electrical information on the camera side. And would have to. Duh.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #22
f16sunshine
Moderator
 
f16sunshine's Avatar
 
f16sunshine is online now
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 3,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomas M View Post
This would be absolutely amazing. With the fuji 35 and it's aperture chatter and slow focus, this will be a life saver.
Since firmware adjustment... aperture chatter is in the past.
__________________
Andy
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #23
Dante_Stella
Rex canum cattorumque
 
Dante_Stella's Avatar
 
Dante_Stella is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 808
Quote:
Originally Posted by mabelsound View Post
Oh wow. If fuji's adapter is going to have six-bit contacts, that could be very interesting.
Not to fuel the speculation, but contacts could be:

1. Six-bit coding, reading the frameline lug position, or some way of transmitting a manually set focal length into the camera.

2. Output from a simple distance encoder (feeding the DOF scale). This does not seem tremendously likely given the shallow depth of a Leica to X adapter.

3. A way for the camera to know that an M lens is attached and to adjust the color shifts/vignetting/etc.

Or it could be all of them. Or none. The inclusion of an X-mount with contacts in the picture might just be a graphic design decision.

Dante
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #24
rommelgc
never clever
 
rommelgc is offline
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: setagaya-ku, tokyo-to
Posts: 44
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by willie_901 View Post
The electrical contacts are a great tease. So is not showing about 60% of the ring.
FWIW, here is another image showing almost the whole line of contacts.
http://fujifilm-x.com/accessories/ja/m/
__________________
flickr

never clever
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2012   #25
BobYIL
Registered User
 
BobYIL's Avatar
 
BobYIL is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dante_Stella View Post
Not to fuel the speculation, but contacts could be:

1. Six-bit coding, reading the frameline lug position, or some way of transmitting a manually set focal length into the camera.

2. Output from a simple distance encoder (feeding the DOF scale). This does not seem tremendously likely given the shallow depth of a Leica to X adapter.

3. A way for the camera to know that an M lens is attached and to adjust the color shifts/vignetting/etc.

Or it could be all of them. Or none. The inclusion of an X-mount with contacts in the picture might just be a graphic design decision.

Dante
The other two are not that "exciting" however the #2; assuming they would employ a sort of transducer in the adapter to convert the focusing cam height into an analog drive signal to operate something similar to a rangefinder for example.. but they did not provide anything for it; no provision in the design, only a CDAF-circuitry with a confirmation signal in the finder.. (Weird..)
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:39.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.