tri-x
Old 05-04-2012   #1
Moto-Uno
Moto-Uno
 
Moto-Uno's Avatar
 
Moto-Uno is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: The Wet Coast
Posts: 789
tri-x

I'm interested in trying Kodak Tri-x(320) in 4x5.I've been using HP5 and enjoying it,but,with all the lore surrounding the tri-x,I'd love to see what it's all about.However(there's always a catch) here in the lower mainland of B.C,it's only available in boxes of 50 and that comes with a price tag over
$125.00!!! The Ilford product come in smaller packs,but you can try any of them for under $40.00 a box.Are there any properties of tri-x that would drive one to say" who cares about the price" 'cuz it just that great a product? I'm lucky if a shoot more than 5 sheets a month.
Hope anyone that's used both films in large format
can shed their personal experiences.
Regards,Peter
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-04-2012   #2
FrankS
Registered User
 
FrankS is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canada, eh.
Age: 57
Posts: 17,468
TriX is just as good as HP5, and vice versa, IMO.
__________________
my little website: http://frankfoto.jimdo.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-04-2012   #3
redisburning
Registered User
 
redisburning's Avatar
 
redisburning is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,596
I suggest a trade thread or a want to buy add in the classifieds. Maybe you can get your hands on something smaller.

Tri-x is a FANTASTIC film in larger formats (or even 35 if it's a print) in my opinion. Worth trying, but like most things it's better to try before you buy (so to speak).
__________________
There's no replacement for displacement.

Thank you.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-04-2012   #4
cjbecker
Registered User
 
cjbecker's Avatar
 
cjbecker is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 132
I was a tri-x 320 fan but I started shooting hp5 at 640 and developing in d76 for 13 min and gives me the feel of tri-x 320 but easer on my wallet. I alse really enjoy shooting ilford and the final results are wonderful.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-04-2012   #5
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
 
Trius's Avatar
 
Trius is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rochester, NY & Toronto area
Posts: 7,746
I have some Tri-X in 4x5 that I might sell or trade; need to see how many sheets I have left. I haven't shot HP5+ in 4x5, but from what I've seen on the web, it has a different character. Not necessarily better, worse, etc., just different. I'm probably going to move to all Ilford for large format, just cuz Kodak has been butz.

Edit: I can ship and receive from GTA, so cross-border issues are avoided.
__________________
My Gallery Flickr
Fine grain is a bourgeois concept

Happiness is APX100 and Rodinal 1:100

A bunch o cameras. Does it really matter?
http://weedram.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-04-2012   #6
Nokton48
Registered User
 
Nokton48's Avatar
 
Nokton48 is online now
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 2,848
I'll use either, but the HP5+ is a tad faster, and that's what I have much more of.
__________________
Sony Nex-3's/Minolta SRT's/SRM's & XK/Hasselblad's/Plaubel Makiflexes/Sinar Norma's

Some of my older pix: http://www.flickr.com/photos/1813448...n/photostream/
Some of my even older pix: http://hassydan.tripod.com/

"There is nothing worse than a sharp photo of a fuzzy concept" -- W. Eugene Smith
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 15:03.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.