| Photography General Interest Neat Photo stuff NOT particularly about Rangefinders. |
04-25-2012
|
#26
|
|
Registered User
dave lackey is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 6,780
|
Sell. You will tire of the Panasonic soon enough and move on to something else. Maybe even another M-mount.
Or,
Don't sell. If you don't need the money, consider the lenses as money in the bank.
If you need the cash, sell.
How's that for straddling the fence? Good luck in your decision.
|
|
|
|
04-25-2012
|
#27
|
|
Shaken, so blurred
mfunnell is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,853
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avotius
I used my Bessa R2A for a while but in the end I could not shoot film anymore as the decent processing of color films in China all but disappeared. So I sold the Bessa too.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avotius
... is to die for when used with TRI-X.
|
Me, I'd buy an M-mount film camera (maybe an R4A), a scanner, shoot B&W and develop myself. But if you don't want to do that (which seems like the only way you'll get value from the lenses, given your other comments) then selling seems your only other sensible option.
...Mike
|
|
|
|
04-25-2012
|
#28
|
|
Registered User
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 18,442
|
Sell the lot. The decision is based on faith, not works.
Cheers,
R.
|
|
|
|
 |
keep |
 |
04-25-2012
|
#29
|
|
David
dseelig is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 133
|
keep
I would keep them and find a cheap user m8 or m9 in the future . Buy user I mean find an ugly one that you get cheap and try using that and see how you feel after a few months.
|
|
|
|
04-25-2012
|
#30
|
|
~
peter_n is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 9,127
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dogberryjr
Sell. Move on.
|
This.
___________
|
|
|
|
04-25-2012
|
#31
|
|
Registered User
dave lackey is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 6,780
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Hicks
Sell the lot. The decision is based on faith, not works.
Cheers,
R.
|
+1...great answer! 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
04-25-2012
|
#32
|
|
Registered User
Keith is online now
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 15,828
|
You never really know what life may hand you next or what may be a round the next corner Colin ... I'd be keeping the lenses!
I thought about selling my M mount lenses a while ago because I wasn't using my only M mount body .... my M2. Lack of time for dealing with film had a lot to do with it and I do really prefer a metered body. I came very close to buying an M9 and spending a boatload of money just so I could use these lenses and have a digital alternative to my D700.
Wouldn't you know it ... an RD-1 appeared in the classifieds for $850 and the rest is history. I have a body to use the lenses on (crop factor allowing) and I didn't blow five grand on something I didn't really need. That 21mm Zeiss would be a great lens on an RD-1 for general shooting and your 50mm would be excellent for portraits as a short tele.
__________________
---------------------------
zenfolio
flickr ... currently all images from the DP2M
|
|
|
|
 |
04-25-2012
|
#33
|
|
Registered User
collum is offline
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 215
|
i'd suggest selling. It sounds like you have the lenses as investment rather than for use. I'd recommend a system where you don't consider the selling price of the tool as a barrier to using it.
|
|
|
|
04-25-2012
|
#34
|
|
Registered User
Shade is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 398
|
I dont see any reason why not. All you got from whats left and the leica system is worry and more worry. You are even worried enough to ask other people about it here. So yes, sell them away and be done with it and be happy.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
04-25-2012
|
#35
|
|
Monster Rancher
Avotius is online now
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chongqing, China
Posts: 3,333
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johann Espiritu
....I always feel a tinge of seller's remorse when I sell any of my RF gear....
|
Dont we all. I still feel the remorse of selling my M6, I loved that thing, but film just was not working out for me here. Sigh...
Quote:
Originally Posted by N.delaRua
...I am surprised that you sold your M's for fear of scratching them. I always thought there was a vast divide between collectors and users. Collectors have things like display cases for the their cameras (like my father), and users have things like lots of rolls of film... You sound like a user to me who as aspirations of a collector. I love the aesthetic of my M, and of older cameras in general, but I would have never bought anything that I was afraid of using.
|
While I have no real aspirations to collect cameras, I do have a small collection of old cheapies that I found here and there, normally found for under 50 bucks that I can play with for a while. As for using, I do shoot a lot of photos, for both commercial and personal use, but it was very strange for me to use the M Leica's and be so freaked out about using them. When we got our 5D it cost more new than my used M8, and I dont have any qualms about using it. Something psycological saw the camera as more than a tool. There is a lot of second hand value in Leica M's where our old 5D was a straight forward tool that paid the bills.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dof
Hi Colin,
Were I in the position you describe, I would sell the lenses and move on to a new photographic relationship. As a musician I've seen gear that I was once deeply attached to be relegated to the corner where the "bad guitars" go. Over time I've discovered that they were key ingredients for a specific period of my creative life. Once the period passed, they were never as inspiring, nor as useful as before...
|
Sound advice. I think this hits the nail on the head.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith
You never really know what life may hand you next or what may be a round the next corner Colin ... I'd be keeping the lenses!
I thought about selling my M mount lenses a while ago because I wasn't using my only M mount body .... my M2. Lack of time for dealing with film had a lot to do with it and I do really prefer a metered body. I came very close to buying an M9 and spending a boatload of money just so I could use these lenses and have a digital alternative to my D700.
Wouldn't you know it ... an RD-1 appeared in the classifieds for $850 and the rest is history. I have a body to use the lenses on (crop factor allowing) and I didn't blow five grand on something I didn't really need. That 21mm Zeiss would be a great lens on an RD-1 for general shooting and your 50mm would be excellent for portraits as a short tele.
|
I have played with a few RD1's and they are great to use cameras. Unfortunately when I have too many toys I have too much indecision about what to take with me. I am sticking to m4/3 for now, I am pleased with the performance and the lenses plus the size so I need to limit myself now to grow. You will be happy to know your old M8 is in good hands with someone who is using it though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by collum
i'd suggest selling. It sounds like you have the lenses as investment rather than for use. I'd recommend a system where you don't consider the selling price of the tool as a barrier to using it.
|
I agree. That is what I like about my m4/3 system. Its plentiful and I dont care about putting dings in it. I have had the Panasonic 20 for about 8 months and have put many a mark on its barrel so its nice to use rather than coddle like my M mount stuff where every mark seems like another 50 bucks I have lost. My EP1 will be ran nearly into the ground then given away, and that seems to be the right way to go.
|
|
|
|
 |
04-25-2012
|
#36
|
|
Registered User
tuanvinh2000 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 136
|
just want to jump in and say what a pity that you sold the M8. i got the inspiration from your Yashica GSN pictures and the M8 with the Zeiss 21mm so much that I started out with the Yashica and continue with an Rd1s. It's true that if you dont care about the rangefinder experience, i dont see why sell them all and get a new m4/3 since their outputs are amazing now with the omd. In the end, your pictures reflect your style, not what camera do you use.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
04-25-2012
|
#37
|
|
Monster Rancher
Avotius is online now
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chongqing, China
Posts: 3,333
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tuanvinh2000
just want to jump in and say what a pity that you sold the M8. i got the inspiration from your Yashica GSN pictures and the M8 with the Zeiss 21mm so much that I started out with the Yashica and continue with an Rd1s. It's true that if you dont care about the rangefinder experience, i dont see why sell them all and get a new m4/3 since their outputs are amazing now with the omd. In the end, your pictures reflect your style, not what camera do you use.
|
I still have that GSN for when the itch to try film again comes! But it just didnt make sense to have so many digital cameras around when the EP1 was fulfilling my needs. Now I do enjoy the RF experience and wish I could stick with it but I have not been too impressed with Fuji's efforts. As much as the X100 is a great camera, it misses a few points for me, namely the 35mm focal length which I dont care for. The other Fuji alternative is too expensive. No I think the OMD is the way forwards.
|
|
|
|
 |
04-26-2012
|
#38
|
|
Moderator
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,928
|
If you are the seller's remorse type, don't sell. If you are sensible, sell. 
|
|
|
|
04-29-2012
|
#39
|
|
Registered User
RObert Budding is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Arlington, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,198
|
Perhaps the OP should buy an M-body that's a total beater. No reason to worry about scratching a body that's heavily brassed and worn.
__________________
"We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true."
~Robert Wilensky
"He could be right, he could be wrong. I think he's wrong but he says it in such a sincere way. You have to think he thinks he's right."
~ Bob Dylan
|
|
|
|
04-29-2012
|
#40
|
|
MoDeRaToR-To Love & Light
helenhill is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,957
|
Sounds like Your Ready Colin
Though I would keep the 21 as a Good Luck / High Merit Charm
Really no matter what You do
You are Blessed with a Gifted Eye
so maybe its Time to Experiment and be Care Free... 
|
|
|
|
04-29-2012
|
#41
|
|
Registered User
steveyork is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 310
|
Sell; you can always replace them later. They're tools, not children.
|
|
|
|
04-29-2012
|
#42
|
|
Dad Photographer
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,928
|
"Lenses are not children." This is a fact indeed.
Lenses don't need diapers when they are very young (or new)!
Lenses don't change in quality each year.
Selling a lens should not hurt.
|
|
|
|
04-29-2012
|
#43
|
|
Registered User
BobYIL is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,314
|
Moving from rangefinder to a pro DSLR, especially with some business concerns behind, is like migrating from one country to another.. Sell the house and move if you are sure to not come back one day.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:20. |
|
|