Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Zeiss Contax

Zeiss Contax Forum for the classic Zeiss Contax I, II, III, IIa, IIIa , G series, and if you want to push it, the nice Contax point and shoots. Some spill over from the Kievs, the Soviet copy of the Contax II/III can also be expected. Plus the ONLY production camera ever made in classic Zeiss Contax Rangefinder mount WITH TTL metering ... the Voigtlander Bessa R2C.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Contax lens register?
Old 04-25-2012   #1
Grytpype
Registered User
 
Grytpype is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Shropshire, UK
Posts: 162
Contax lens register?

It always surprised me that there seems to be a lot of uncertainty about the exact lens register for the Contax mount. Some say that the distance to the film plane from the front of the outer bayonet should be 35mm. Peter Tooke's repair book for the Contax II/III states that the Contax IIa/IIIa manual gives the figure from the front of the INNER bayonet as 35mm, which is completely wrong (by about 3mm), and he has redrawn the original Zeiss Ikon diagram to support this thesis!

Now that I have seen a copy of the Contax IIa/IIIa manual, I am certain that the 35mm figure is based on a misunderstanding of the diagram in the manual.

First I have attached a picture from the manual showing the tools used for setting the register.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg contax_register_1.jpg (15.2 KB, 29 views)
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-25-2012   #2
Grytpype
Registered User
 
Grytpype is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Shropshire, UK
Posts: 162
I have attached another picture showing the set-up used for checking the register, and here is a rough translation of the instructions in the manual:

Alignment of the lens surfaces on the inner and outer bayonet must be made with extreme care. To adjust, a surface table with Fühluhr [dial gauge?] (1/100 mm reading) is required.

Before beginning the adjustment, put the gauge block 563/24 M/715-3 on one of the longitudinal cut surfaces of the support for the film plane 563/24 M/715-1 and set the dial indicator to 0.

Place the camera with open shutter (set to T) on the support 563/24 M715-1, put the bayonet to infinity and place the insert 563/24 M715-2 into the inner bayonet.

By placing shims 39 371 or 39 372 under the screw holes of the outer bayonet the lens support is to be adjusted so that when the screws are tightened well the indicator shows again at 0 (maximum deviation permitted +0.01 / -0.03 mm).


The original text gives a second series of tool numbers which applied pre- December '52, that I have omitted for simplicity.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg contax_register_2.jpg (35.2 KB, 18 views)
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-25-2012   #3
Grytpype
Registered User
 
Grytpype is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Shropshire, UK
Posts: 162
So from this, the method would work as follows:

1/ You place the first tool 563/24 M/715-1 on the surface table, stand the gauge-block 563/24 M/715-3 on the precision-ground surface of this tool and zero the dial-gauge on its top surface (from what follows you can deduce that the height of this gauge-block must be exactly 35mm).

2/ The camera is placed on the support 563/24 M/715-1 so that the rectangular section screwed to the tool locates in the film gate, and the film rails lie on the ground surface of the tool.

3/ You place the circular piece 563/24 M/715-2 so that it rests on the front of the inner bayonet, and set the pointer of the dial-gauge on to the front (top) surface of the circular piece. If the register is correct the dial-gauge will read zero, and if it isn't, you correct with shims as you would expect.

Thus the register is set from the front of the inner bayonet, and is equal to 35mm MINUS the thickness of the disc 563/24 M/715-2.

The attachment shows the diagram that illustrates this, and you can clearly see that the 35mm dimension is to the surface of the disc 563/24 M/715-2, not to the front of the outer bayonet. It is possible that the surface of the disc should, in fact, be at the same level as the outer bayonet, though there is nothing to confirm this. The diagram actually shows the outer bayonet as being slightly forward of the 35mm mark, though I suspect it should be slightly below it.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg contax_register_3.jpg (36.6 KB, 20 views)
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-25-2012   #4
Grytpype
Registered User
 
Grytpype is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Shropshire, UK
Posts: 162
Unless there is some other Zeiss Ikon literature which gives an actual figure for either bayonet (or unless someone finds they have a 563/24 M715-2 disc lying around in their junk box!) there doesn't seem to me to be any way of finding a definitive figure. The Kiev Survival Site quotes the Peter Tooke book, though unlike the book he does give the 35mm figure as being to the outer bayonet. I found a list of mounts here that gives a figure of 34.85mm to the outer bayonet (which I suspect may actually be near the mark).

The only camera I have measured accurately so far is a 1975 Kiev, which was 34.90mm to the outer bayonet (plus/minus about .02mm), but perhaps a late Kiev is not the best guide.

Does anyone have any other information, or accurately measured figures?

Steve.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-27-2012   #5
bowieknife
Registered User
 
bowieknife is offline
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 92
34.85mm:
http://www.graphics.cornell.edu/~wes...-register.html
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-27-2012   #6
Grytpype
Registered User
 
Grytpype is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Shropshire, UK
Posts: 162
The link in my previous post is the same site. I'm just not sure how reliable their figures are: for example for Exakta they give 44.7mm, whereas the correct figure is 44.72mm. Not a huge difference, but outside the official Ihagee tolerance which is plus/minus .01mm.

If they use an inaccurate figure for a register which is easy to find elsewhere online, can we be sure their Contax figure is correct? Their figure is fairly close to my Kiev measurements, though, which is why I think it could be in the right ball-park.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-29-2012   #7
Grytpype
Registered User
 
Grytpype is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Shropshire, UK
Posts: 162
More support for 34.85mm. On the Zenit Camera page for the Jupiter-12 there is a cutaway diagram of the lens in Kiev mount showing the 34.85mm dimension to the front of the outer bayonet.

In the absence of any reliable information to the contrary, I think 34.85 is the number to go for.

Edit 07/05/12:
It looks as though the zenitcamera.com site may have closed, but the diagram on the page I linked to is availble on Wayback Machine at:
http://web.archive.org/web/200812041...upiter-12.html

Edit 16/11/12:
Possibly worth mentioning that I have checked one Contax II since last edit, which measured exactly 34.85mm to the front of the outer bayonet. I'd reckon my measurement method accurate to .02mm, so there is no doubt that 34.85mm is the correct figure.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:35.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.