Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > CSC : Compact System Cameras - > Sony NEX

Sony NEX This forum is for the entire Sony NEX series.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Anybody using Olympus PEN lenses on their NEX-7?
Old 04-08-2012   #1
Ken Ford
Refuses to suffer fools
 
Ken Ford's Avatar
 
Ken Ford is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Suburban Chicago, IL USA
Age: 50
Posts: 2,186
Anybody using Olympus PEN lenses on their NEX-7?

Surprisingly little turns up in a forum search, so apologies if this has been beaten to death already.

I'm really enjoying my new NEX-7, especially with Oly OM Zuikos. This has gotten me to thinking... how are PEN lenses on the NEX?

I seem to recall PEN lenses actually outresolved most contemporary SLR lenses which, if true, would bode well for their performance on the NEX-7.

A 25/2.8, 38/1.8 and 60/1.5 would in theory make a nice little kit!
__________________
"If you can control yourself and just loathe us quietly from a distance then by all means stay." - Joe

M6 - Leicavit M - RapidWinder - Motor M
28 Ultron - 35 Summicron ASPH - 40 Summicron - 75 Summarit-M - 75 Color-Heliar - 90 Elmar-C
NEX-7, N1V1, oodles of filthy Nikon SLRs and DSLRs, some OM gear, an XA, Retinas, a 4x5 and a lonely 500C/M
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-08-2012   #2
jippiejee
Registered User
 
jippiejee's Avatar
 
jippiejee is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 595
The imaging circle of m4/3 lenses is smaller than those for aps-c sensors, so if technically possible, there'll be some vignetting.
__________________
flickr
flickriver


Leica: D2 / CL / X1 / M4-P / M8
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-08-2012   #3
Ken Ford
Refuses to suffer fools
 
Ken Ford's Avatar
 
Ken Ford is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Suburban Chicago, IL USA
Age: 50
Posts: 2,186
I should have clarified - *original* PEN lenses, not the current m4/3 ones.
__________________
"If you can control yourself and just loathe us quietly from a distance then by all means stay." - Joe

M6 - Leicavit M - RapidWinder - Motor M
28 Ultron - 35 Summicron ASPH - 40 Summicron - 75 Summarit-M - 75 Color-Heliar - 90 Elmar-C
NEX-7, N1V1, oodles of filthy Nikon SLRs and DSLRs, some OM gear, an XA, Retinas, a 4x5 and a lonely 500C/M
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-08-2012   #4
michel v
Registered User
 
michel v is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 24
I only have experience with the Pen 40mm f1.4.

It was nice, but these Pen lenses are prone to failure in the focus ring part, which makes the ring sometimes "skip" a bit.
Mine fell in two parts in my hand on the first day, even though I paid top money for a "like new" sample. Had to pay more money to get it fixed…

Supposedly the 38mm f1.8 is very nice. A nice chap is selling one (with properly working rings) on another forum; if you're interested, send me a PM.

Not sure if the 60mm f1.5 is great, but it goes for crazy money today. :/
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-08-2012   #5
Ken Ford
Refuses to suffer fools
 
Ken Ford's Avatar
 
Ken Ford is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Suburban Chicago, IL USA
Age: 50
Posts: 2,186
I think I'd better do some research before I jump into anything! That said, PM incoming.
__________________
"If you can control yourself and just loathe us quietly from a distance then by all means stay." - Joe

M6 - Leicavit M - RapidWinder - Motor M
28 Ultron - 35 Summicron ASPH - 40 Summicron - 75 Summarit-M - 75 Color-Heliar - 90 Elmar-C
NEX-7, N1V1, oodles of filthy Nikon SLRs and DSLRs, some OM gear, an XA, Retinas, a 4x5 and a lonely 500C/M
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-08-2012   #6
Smiert Spionam
Registered User
 
Smiert Spionam is offline
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 15
There are quite a few threads about them, but they're scattered around various forums -- definitely some on fredmiranda.com and dpreview.com. I've only owned the 100/3.5, but it's excellent (on par with the best ~100mm primes). The 40/1.4 has an especially good reputation, and the 38/1.8 is one of the more affordable ways in. With their short registration distance, they're also very compact.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-09-2012   #7
michel v
Registered User
 
michel v is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 24
The 40mm f1.4 has terrible bokeh wide open though.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-09-2012   #8
zuikologist
.........................
 
zuikologist is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Posts: 1,501
I have the 38/1.8 on a Kiwifoto adapter. A very good combo that I normally use wide open. Very compact, with image quality up to rf optics standards. I'll try to find some photos.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=867'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-09-2012   #9
mabelsound
actually a dude
 
mabelsound's Avatar
 
mabelsound is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 43
Posts: 5,403
The 60/1.5 is brilliant. A great lens.
__________________
photoblog, flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-09-2012   #10
kuuan
Registered User
 
kuuan is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: right now: Hanoi, Vietnam
Age: 52
Posts: 33
Pen-F lenses make a perfect fit on a NEX, though I use it on NEX5N, not NEX7
there is no vignetting ( PEN-F halframe is 18mmx24mm, NEX APS-C is 23.4mm×15.6mm ),
as compared to most rangefinder lenses Pen-F lenses have shorter minimum focus distance, e.g. 35cm for the 38mm and 40mm, 20 cm for the 20mm
register distance are 18mm for Sony E and 28,95mm for PEN-F so the adapter is only about 1cm deep.
see the f1.8/38 on my NEX5N:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/6...6528/lightbox/

see my photos taken with the f1.8/35mm: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/s...88053181/show/
with the f1.4/40mm: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/s...15399105/show/
with the f3.5/20mm: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/s...25919493/show/
and just two with the f3.5/100mm: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/s...64071135/show/
since today only I also have the f2.8/25mm, hope to have some samples soon.

( and btw. if someone is looking for a f1.8/38 I have two copies for sale right now, one for 115.- the other for 130 Euro excl. caps, sending from Japan by EMS incl. insurance and tracking 18 Euro, interested please P.M. )

best greetings,
Andreas
__________________
my manual lenses and photos taken with them: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/c...7604973031858/

Last edited by kuuan : 04-14-2012 at 19:53. Reason: added price of lens
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-10-2012   #11
Kent
Leica-Fan and NEXer
 
Kent's Avatar
 
Kent is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Germany
Age: 42
Posts: 1,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by kuuan View Post
Pen-F lenses make a perfect fit on a NEX, though I use it on NEX5N, not NEX7
I confirm for the NEX-7! Amazing matches!
__________________
Cheers, Kent
_______
Cams: Leica, Sony, Canon, Nikon, Sigma, Fuji, Panasonic and Pentax... mainly.
Lenses: Voigtländer, Leica, Sony, Sigma, Nikkor, Tokina, Tamron and some others.
Click me...
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-19-2012   #12
Jim Evidon
Registered User
 
Jim Evidon's Avatar
 
Jim Evidon is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 231
Why use an old Pen F lens when there are better M mount CV lenses? I have several plus a Leica Summicron and 2 Elmarits. The Leica lenses are superior because of the greater contrast giving snappier images, but when it comes to sharpness, medium contrast, little or no focus shift and price, the Cosina Voightlander lenses are hard to beat. See SeanReid's comments on these great lenses.
__________________
Jim

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts"
......Daniel Patrick Moynihan


Leica M8 & M4P
Olympus OM-D (E-M5)
Sony NEX5N
Sony A33 SLR
Nikon D300
Nikon 8008
Minox B
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-28-2012   #13
nemjo
Avatar Challenge
 
nemjo's Avatar
 
nemjo is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hungary
Posts: 301
Hi,

I have to admit, first I bought the Nex for my CV lenses.
Now I had to buy a small bag for the Pen lenses to use with the Nex...
The 25/2.8, the 40/1.4 along with the 100/3.5 works well in a tiny package.


and a crop of that:



cheers,

nemjo
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1780'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-30-2012   #14
kuuan
Registered User
 
kuuan is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: right now: Hanoi, Vietnam
Age: 52
Posts: 33
I don't have any Voigtlaender nor Leica to compare and like some of my Pen-F lenses very much, e.g. the 1.4/40 for close range head shots
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1856-2.ps1.jpg (83.8 KB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg 1487.red2.jpg (122.0 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg 1761.ps.red2.jpg (155.1 KB, 9 views)
__________________
my manual lenses and photos taken with them: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/c...7604973031858/
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-20-2012   #15
lattiboy
Registered User
 
lattiboy is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 16
I took one of my favorite portraits with (what I consider to be) the best single pound-for-pound/value lens available anywhere. The sharpness this the 38mm f/1.8 produces is jaw dropping, even at f/2. Considering the almost comically small size, it makes me a little angry that the Sony 50mm is such a beast.

Wide open on, I believe, the NEX-7 (possibly 5N, but I've tested on the 7 and it still delivers in *****s)

  Reply With Quote

Old 06-21-2012   #16
flip
良かったね!
 
flip's Avatar
 
flip is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kobe, Japan
Posts: 1,209
I use them regularly on the Nex5. Pretty much, I only use M-mount lenses in the niche where they are size-compatible. For long or macro, it's hard to been pen lenses. Last weekend, I took the pen macro and the OM 21/2 out as a set and found it incredibly flexible.
__________________
Very happy with my Shintaro BP M2. Thanks!
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-22-2012   #17
nemjo
Avatar Challenge
 
nemjo's Avatar
 
nemjo is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hungary
Posts: 301
Nex 7 with Oly 100/3.5


nemjo
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1780'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-23-2012   #18
uhoh7
Registered User
 
uhoh7 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 723
the 42/1.2 is excellent, aside from a modern zeiss-like bokeh and super sharp stopped down. 38 as noted reputed to be good also.

the 20 and the 25/2.8 are very sharp in the center, but forget the corners--unless you focus for them. Spherical aberation.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-11-2012   #19
sebboh
Registered User
 
sebboh is offline
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2
i'm quite fond of my 42/1.2 on the NEX-7. it's extremely sharp stopped down across the frame. wide open it is pretty sharp in the center and but with a fair bit of field curvature and glow. it is a relatively low contrast lens. bokeh is funky and swirly wide open but can be used to artistic effect quite nicely. stopped down the bokeh is pretty nice. it has a little bit of CA and a fair bit of distortion, but neither are really noticeable unless you look for them. the only thing that makes it a less than stellar allround lens is troublesome flare in with bright light sources (e.g. city lights at night).

i also had the 38/1.8 for a while but sold it due to lack of use. it is more contrasty with less distortion than the 42/1.2, but i found it to be less 'magical'.

here's my flickr photos with those two lenses (most are with the 42mm): http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=olym...N04&ss=2&s=int

it fits the camera so well too:


  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:30.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.