Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Coffee With Mentors > Roger Hicks -- Author of The Rangefinder Book

Roger Hicks -- Author of The Rangefinder Book

Roger Hicks is a well known photographic writer, author of The Rangefinder Book, over three dozen other photographic books, and a frequent contributor to Shutterbug and Amateur Photographer. Unusually in today's photographic world, most of his camera reviews are film cameras, especially rangefinders. See www.rogerandfrances.com for further background (Frances is his wife Frances Schultz, acknowledged darkroom addict and fellow Shutterbug contributor) .


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 04-18-2012   #51
Ron (Netherlands)
Registered User
 
Ron (Netherlands)'s Avatar
 
Ron (Netherlands) is online now
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,552
When I got the M8.2 (chromium) most people that commented said it was the best camera once made for film
__________________
__________________
When day is done......

Leica: Urleica, IIa synch conversion, M2, M6 TTL Millenium

My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-18-2012   #52
Paul Luscher
Registered User
 
Paul Luscher is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 681
While using an M3 years ago, I was once told by one character who noticed I was using a rangefinder, that I would take better pictures if I stopped using "that old piece of s**t"....
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-18-2012   #53
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,939
Quote:
Originally Posted by photomoof View Post
You have had bad experiences with the type of women attracted by cameras?
No experience... because I'm usually too shy to capitalize. It's probably happened a grand total of 10 times in 2 years (in which woman comment on my Leica or Fuji). I guess my point is that if you want women who are attracted more to your belongings than you, you might as well get a fancy watch or car or fancy clothing... something they know is worth crazy loot.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-18-2012   #54
tom.w.bn
Registered User
 
tom.w.bn is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit View Post
No experience... because I'm usually too shy to capitalize. It's probably happened a grand total of 10 times in 2 years (in which woman comment on my Leica or Fuji). I guess my point is that if you want women who are attracted more to your belongings than you, you might as well get a fancy watch or car or fancy clothing... something they know is worth crazy loot.
If you want this, invest in a Porsche and/or a cosmetic surgeon
__________________

Flickr stuff
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-18-2012   #55
Jobin
Registered User
 
Jobin's Avatar
 
Jobin is offline
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 212
A 70 year-old woman commented on my m6, "that's a nice camera." Iv had many comments on my x100 as well as m6. When I had my m8 many asked why I was using a film camera. Peeves me when "professional" photographers laugh at me for using film.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-18-2012   #56
Richard G
Registered User
 
Richard G's Avatar
 
Richard G is offline
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: 37,47 S
Posts: 3,587
I get many more comments about my chrome M5 than my other Leicas. People are impressed by that brutalist masterpiece. All but one of the comments regarding the chrome M9-P have been from young women, already interested in film photogrpahy. I think one person to whom I showed the darkened LCD screen thought I was trying to have a lend of them as the conversation stopped suddenly at that point. Recently, when I was carrying the M9-P in one hand, strap around the wrist, a woman in her 50s kept stride with me and asked me what it was. "Aaaah! The M9." She is a professional photographer. Clearly she hadn't been sure it was an M9, and clearly she wanted one. She turned away from me to reveal her backpack. "That's my D3 in there." She's a professional photographer, a tiny woman, and she just cannot keep lugging that heavy rig. I let her hold it - it's not that light, and I extolled the virtues of the D3. But I think she was won over, if not before she saw it.

In the same part of the city I saw someone with an X100 last year. My first thought was 'Leica'. It took seconds for me to decipher the face of that camera and recognize it as the same as my own X100.

My M9-P then passes for an M2 in the eyes of almost everyone. But contrary to JSR's contention above, carrying an old film camera or look alike is almost as good as walking a dog for starting a conversation.
__________________
Richard
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-18-2012   #57
furcafe
Registered User
 
furcafe's Avatar
 
furcafe is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Washington, DC, USA
Age: 46
Posts: 3,846
In my experience, Leicas (& film cameras in general), mostly attract attention from middle-aged to elderly men. I've had guys literally stare for several minutes before working up the courage to engage in conversation. Since I carry my cameras on a strap "bandolier" style, this often results in them staring @ my chest. I find this phenomenon so predictable, & creepy, that I joke that I now know what large-breasted women feel like. Yo, eyes up here!

I was down in Miami to check out Art Basel & mentioned this to some non-photographer friends during drinks. They laughed, but thought I was exaggerating. Later on, though, as were all standing on the street waiting for the valet to bring their car up, 3 middle-aged European (German, I think) guys walking by suddenly stopped in their tracks, stared @ my Leica & talked amongst themselves for a good 30 seconds, & then 1 of them asked "Is that an M9?"

I'm putting this out there since this could be useful information for straight gals & gay dudes looking for a photo sugar daddy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit View Post
No experience... because I'm usually too shy to capitalize. It's probably happened a grand total of 10 times in 2 years (in which woman comment on my Leica or Fuji). I guess my point is that if you want women who are attracted more to your belongings than you, you might as well get a fancy watch or car or fancy clothing... something they know is worth crazy loot.
__________________
Five a Second. Chicago's Bell & Howell Co. (cameras) announced that it would put on sale this fall the world's most expensive still camera. Its "Foton" will take five 35-mm. pictures a second, sell for $700. Bell & Howell, which has found that "families of both low and high incomes now spend over $550" for movie equipment, hopes to sell 20,000 Fotons a year.

--Facts And Figures, Time magazine, Monday, October 4, 1948
My Photoblog

My Flickr stream

My RFF Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-18-2012   #58
Bob Michaels
nobody special
 
Bob Michaels's Avatar
 
Bob Michaels is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Apopka FL (USA)
Age: 69
Posts: 2,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by photomoof View Post
You have had bad experiences with the type of women attracted by cameras?
I notice they are either old, fat or ugly. Sometimes two. Sometimes all three attributes.

Oh wait! I just realized it is the same when I am not carrying a camera.
__________________
http://www.bobmichaels.org
the correct answer to 99% of photo related questions is "it depends"
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-18-2012   #59
kbg32
neo-romanticist
 
kbg32's Avatar
 
kbg32 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 4,229
Years ago I was walking down a street with my black Contax G2 in hand. I passed a homeless man sitting against a wall who kept yelling "Leica! Leica!" as I walked by.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-19-2012   #60
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,939
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom.w.bn View Post
If you want this, invest in a Porsche and/or a cosmetic surgeon
I didn't say I want that... I was saying that it is silly to buy a camera in order to get "chicks."
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-19-2012   #61
efix
RF user by conviction
 
efix's Avatar
 
efix is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 712
The only two times people perceived my M8 as a Leica, it were both elderly gentlemen who obviously knew what a Leica was. Only one of them, however, realized it was digital -- himself being a Sony a33 user, so pretty up to date.

In that sense, there isn't really ever any chance to "show off" -- besides the fact that this is the last thing I desire to do with my M8 ...
__________________
"In my humble estimate, there’s a huge lack of appreciation out there for the wonderful aesthetic look that film of all types can lend to an image. Sadly, that doesn’t seem to count in a world that is rushing nowhere like a lot of headless chickens." – Jonathan Eastland
blog | facebook | twitter | flickr! | 500px
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-19-2012   #62
semrich
Registered User
 
semrich's Avatar
 
semrich is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 1,916
I've been asked by two young men while on the ferry if my M8 was an "antique camera."
__________________
- Richard

"The individual is an aperture through which the whole energy of the universe is aware of itself"...

Alan Watts
The Art of Contemplation

http://www.rweatheredgallery.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-20-2012   #63
Paul Jenkin
Late Developer
 
Paul Jenkin is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 381
I don't have a digital Leica (I have an M6TTL and an M4-P). Strangely, I get the polar opposite reaction insofar as I have had pople asking to have a look at photos I've taken immediately after hitting the shutter.

On the few occasions it's happened, the would-be viewers seem very surprised that I still use film. At that point I make my excuses and leave as I cannot understand digi-crusaders, despite enjopying using my own digita cameras from time to time.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-20-2012   #64
Richard G
Registered User
 
Richard G's Avatar
 
Richard G is offline
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: 37,47 S
Posts: 3,587
The X100 is the spoiler. I have had friends and colleagues who know of my old film cameras check themselves after asking for flash or asking to see the image immediately, only to be completely bamboozled by the on-board flash going off and me leaning across to show them the image.
__________________
Richard
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-20-2012   #65
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,939
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard G View Post
The X100 is the spoiler. I have had friends and colleagues who know of my old film cameras check themselves after asking for flash or asking to see the image immediately, only to be completely bamboozled by the on-board flash going off and me leaning across to show them the image.
Ah, I love a good bamboozling. I'm going to steal this move.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-20-2012   #66
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 18,444
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit View Post
I didn't say I want that... I was saying that it is silly to buy a camera in order to get "chicks."
Depends on the chicks you're chasing, and where you are.

If I were 20 years old again; at art school; and as unscrupulous as the average 20-year-old male, I think I'd choose quite carefully which camera pulled the largest number of attractive young ladies. Different cameras certainly used to differ in pulling power, and I imagine they still do.

In all probability, too, they attract different kinds of girls. I think I'd almost certainly prefer the ones who wanted something a bit out of the ordinary (no DSLRs, therefore) and who fancied young men who clearly knew how to use what they had...

My wife says that if she were 20, and studying theatre at USC again, she'd feel much the same way. At that age, any advantage you can get is welcome when it comes to spotting attractive companions. It's what you do with it afterwards (whether you're a decent human being or not) that matters.

Cheers,

R.
__________________
Now even more free photography information on www.rogerandfrances.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-20-2012   #67
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,939
True Roger, but the M6 I used in Art school didn't get me any women. I guess even a Leica cannot polish this turd.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-20-2012   #68
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
 
Gabriel M.A.'s Avatar
 
Gabriel M.A. is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Paris, Frons
Posts: 10,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjh View Post
I was at a wedding with my M9 last weekend and was asked, "Where do you get film these days?".
Seven years ago, I had an M6 at work, and a guy looked at it, and said: "Very nice! How many megapixels?"

Then I had my first taste of "film vs. digital" when somebody at a wedding went on and on just how digital was not the same, and then at another party somebody went on and on about how film was stupid.

I'm not mocking. I just find it curious how we all make assumptions and move forward as if we're right from the get-go.
__________________
Big wig wisdom: "Who the hell wants to hear actors talk?" --Harry Warner, of Warner Bros., 1927

Fellow RFF member: I respect your bandwidth by not posting images larger than 800px on the longest side, and by removing image in a quote.
Together we can combat bandwidth waste (and image scrolling).



My Flickr | (one of) My Portfolio
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-20-2012   #69
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 18,444
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit View Post
True Roger, but the M6 I used in Art school didn't get me any women. I guess even a Leica cannot polish this turd.
No, no, dear boy: you went to the wrong art school!

Cheers,

R.
__________________
Now even more free photography information on www.rogerandfrances.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-21-2012   #70
dreamsandart
Registered User
 
dreamsandart's Avatar
 
dreamsandart is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 451
In the two years I've had the M9 I've had exactly one person comment on it and recognize it for what it was, and that was a woman that was part of a national television crew that was doing a special on a temple here in Kyoto I was visiting.

I can't say I've even gotten a sideways glace that I've noticed.

Now when my black paint M4 was my usual knock around camera I'd have people in the know raving to their girlfriend's and pointing telling them what it was.

In general Japanese a fairly well educated about cameras. So I don't know.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:57.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.