Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > SLRs - the unRF

SLRs - the unRF For those of you who must talk about SLRs, if only to confirm they are not RF.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 04-17-2012   #2276
shadowfox
Personal Photography
 
shadowfox's Avatar
 
shadowfox is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankS View Post
Selling all my Olympus SLR gear! Love it, but I'm too invested in Nikon and I don't need a whole second 35mm SLR system. Check the classifies here.
Yep, that's what I had to do some time ago to my Minolta MD "collection"
There is such a thing as having too many SLR systems.
__________________
Have a good light,
Will


  Reply With Quote

Old 04-17-2012   #2277
maitani
Registered User
 
maitani's Avatar
 
maitani is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 569
I'm selling one of my OM-3 in the classifieds, those don't pop up often.. So i thought i ll let you know

regards
maitani
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-21-2012   #2278
julescasablancas
still GAS-eous
 
julescasablancas's Avatar
 
julescasablancas is offline
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 330
Taken with my G.Zuiko 50mm 1.4 and my OM2n (which is sold to make way for OM4t black)


Unfortunately, that lens has a crippled diaphragm blade just last week
__________________


FS: Summicron 35mm V3 | Nikon FM3a
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-21-2012   #2279
Ken Ford
Refuses to suffer fools
 
Ken Ford's Avatar
 
Ken Ford is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Suburban Chicago, IL USA
Age: 51
Posts: 2,270
My little pile of Zuikos has gotten a new lease on life since I picked up a NEX-7 - the combination really works well. I'm actually considering adding to the stable! My 24/2.8 in particular is great on this body:



A fast 50 in particular would be tasty, especially since my Nikkor 50/1.2 on a NEX adapter is a behemoth on the NEX. My Zuiko 50/1.8 MIJ is doing just fine for the moment, though!
__________________
"If you can control yourself and just loathe us quietly from a distance then by all means stay." - Joe

M6 - Leicavit M - RapidWinder - Motor M
28 Ultron - 35 Summicron ASPH - 40 Summicron - 75 Summarit-M - 75 Color-Heliar - 90 Elmar-C
X100s, NEX-7, N1V1, oodles of filthy Nikon SLRs and DSLRs, some OM gear, an XA, Retinas, a 4x5 and a lonely 500C/M
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-21-2012   #2280
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
 
Trius's Avatar
 
Trius is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rochester, NY & Toronto area
Posts: 7,750
Ken: I may have an extra 50/1.4 I could part with. Let me dig a bit.
__________________
My Gallery Flickr
Fine grain is a bourgeois concept

Happiness is APX100 and Rodinal 1:100

A bunch o cameras. Does it really matter?
http://weedram.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-21-2012   #2281
Ken Ford
Refuses to suffer fools
 
Ken Ford's Avatar
 
Ken Ford is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Suburban Chicago, IL USA
Age: 51
Posts: 2,270
Please let me know - I could be very interested!
__________________
"If you can control yourself and just loathe us quietly from a distance then by all means stay." - Joe

M6 - Leicavit M - RapidWinder - Motor M
28 Ultron - 35 Summicron ASPH - 40 Summicron - 75 Summarit-M - 75 Color-Heliar - 90 Elmar-C
X100s, NEX-7, N1V1, oodles of filthy Nikon SLRs and DSLRs, some OM gear, an XA, Retinas, a 4x5 and a lonely 500C/M
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-21-2012   #2282
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
 
Trius's Avatar
 
Trius is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rochester, NY & Toronto area
Posts: 7,750
OM 35/2.8 K64

__________________
My Gallery Flickr
Fine grain is a bourgeois concept

Happiness is APX100 and Rodinal 1:100

A bunch o cameras. Does it really matter?
http://weedram.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-22-2012   #2283
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
 
Trius's Avatar
 
Trius is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rochester, NY & Toronto area
Posts: 7,750
OM-1 100/2.8 Kodachrome 1977
Bruce Cockburn

__________________
My Gallery Flickr
Fine grain is a bourgeois concept

Happiness is APX100 and Rodinal 1:100

A bunch o cameras. Does it really matter?
http://weedram.blogspot.com

Last edited by Trius : 04-22-2012 at 09:28. Reason: added name for those who don't know the subject
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-22-2012   #2284
paulfish4570
Registered User
 
paulfish4570's Avatar
 
paulfish4570 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: On the Locust Fork of the Warrior River, Alabama
Age: 62
Posts: 9,587
that is a well-preserved 'chrome shot ...
__________________
i show what i see ...
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-22-2012   #2285
paulfish4570
Registered User
 
paulfish4570's Avatar
 
paulfish4570 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: On the Locust Fork of the Warrior River, Alabama
Age: 62
Posts: 9,587
i think i know now why i like my zuiko 50/1.8 so much: it renders like an elmar 50/2.8 i had 30-plus years ago, but with a little more speed.

__________________
i show what i see ...
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-22-2012   #2286
CVickery
Registered User
 
CVickery is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 112
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trius View Post
OM-1 100/2.8 Kodachrome 1977
Bruce Cockburn

...
Nice shot ... I was a big fan of Bruce in that era, and I just picked up a OM1 with 100/2.8 combo from FrankS on the B&S
__________________
_____________________________________
CL, M7, M240
Zeiss ZM 18/4, Leica Elmar 24/3.8, Summilux 35/1.4 ASPH, Summilux 50/1.4 ASPH, Jupiter 8 50/2, Elmarit-M 90/2.8
Other stuff
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-23-2012   #2287
julescasablancas
still GAS-eous
 
julescasablancas's Avatar
 
julescasablancas is offline
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 330
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trius View Post
OM 35/2.8 K64

Love the colors!
Is there any modern slide film that is close to the K64 in character?
__________________


FS: Summicron 35mm V3 | Nikon FM3a
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-23-2012   #2288
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
 
Trius's Avatar
 
Trius is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rochester, NY & Toronto area
Posts: 7,750
Paul: All my Kodachromes seem to have withstood the test of time despite, shall we say "uneven" storage conditions.

Also, I really like your observation about the 50/1.8 ... not having had an Elmar, I wouldn't have noticed that, but I think you are onto something. Different optical formulas, but I think the looks are similar. My favourite normal is the Rollei Tessar 40/2.8, which I think epitomizes that look.

CVickery: Seek out a Cockburn concert and shoot with that rig! FrankS is a good friend of mine, so I'm glad you two connected. I've seen Bruce three times, all in different decades; the last time was in Brampton.

Jules: I'm not sure. I never shot with much other than Kodachrome, Ektachrome and Agfachrome; the Fuji stuff never did much for me, except for Astia, which is different from Kodachrome.

Thanks, everyone ... one more Kodachrome/OM shot below ...
__________________
My Gallery Flickr
Fine grain is a bourgeois concept

Happiness is APX100 and Rodinal 1:100

A bunch o cameras. Does it really matter?
http://weedram.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-23-2012   #2289
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
 
Trius's Avatar
 
Trius is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rochester, NY & Toronto area
Posts: 7,750
OM 100/2.8 (I think) Kodachrome

__________________
My Gallery Flickr
Fine grain is a bourgeois concept

Happiness is APX100 and Rodinal 1:100

A bunch o cameras. Does it really matter?
http://weedram.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-23-2012   #2290
redisburning
-
 
redisburning is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,551
if you don't have a 50/3.5 macro I highly suggest you purchase one.

it is very rare for a person as picky and fickle as me to find something I can say is unequivocally amazing. I treat this lens like it only works at f5.6 and am NEVER disappointed by the results.

this is one of a handful of OM lenses that I have bought myself, rather than having been gifted. but this would be the last to go.

I'm going to develop a roll of the same film I used my ZM50 on. I will update the thread with my thoughts. I have mentally prepared myself to accept that the Zuiko may be a superior lens, both technically and stylistically. We shall see. I now have my own scanner, I haven't seen much of the Planar on t-grained film, so this is only a guess (fear). Until then, here are my two favorite shots from the roll:


Untitled by redisburning, on Flickr

Untitled by redisburning, on Flickr

my only complaint is that I still cannot focus an SLR with the same accuracy as a RF, and these shots were the result of me taking a very, very long time on each shot.

oh, and excellent shots everyone! I love to see Kodachrome. Unfortunately I missed the boat on that one; I started taking photographs very shortly after Dwayne's discontinued processing.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-24-2012   #2291
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
 
Trius's Avatar
 
Trius is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rochester, NY & Toronto area
Posts: 7,750
I have been given two 50/3.5s, sold one to Gene W. I will confess I haven't used it much, but I should. The person who gave them to me used the 50/3.5 a lot. I promise I'll do better!
__________________
My Gallery Flickr
Fine grain is a bourgeois concept

Happiness is APX100 and Rodinal 1:100

A bunch o cameras. Does it really matter?
http://weedram.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-24-2012   #2292
CTAPbIU_XPEH_RUSSIA
Registered User
 
CTAPbIU_XPEH_RUSSIA's Avatar
 
CTAPbIU_XPEH_RUSSIA is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 36
Olympus Zuiko 35/2.8 at 8-11

All series
http://www.flickr.com/photos/6244139...th/6946471906/
__________________
The Soviet - means excellent (slogan of the Soviet era)
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-24-2012   #2293
redisburning
-
 
redisburning is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,551
well a promise is a promise.

I can say at this point that my Scan Dual 3 does not have a high enough resolution to tell which lens has more resolution in lp/mm.

But, I think this speaks fairly highly to the little Zuiko. It is more than capable of making razor sharp negatives.

So, the ZM Planar offers you 2 more usable stops (2.8 and 4; the Zuiko IMO should be shot only at f5.6 unless you need the extra depth of field that f8 offers) and it's emergency aperture is about 3 stops faster. It also can be bought new (for a reasonable price in the realm of new lenses, I might add), is an M mount lens and offers more modern coatings.

The Zuiko is much, much less expensive and focuses very close.

Now to the more subjective things. The Zuiko has a different kind of rendering than any other lens I've ever owned. Where I think it excels the most is when you capture the ground and see the picture drift into and then out of the plane of best focus. example here:


Untitled by redisburning, on Flickr

the ZM is more of a general purpose lens IMO, and there it cannot be faulted. I had originally mistook the Zuiko's special look, which I like but understand others may not, as being some sign of general quality. Rather than that, it is a unique little gem. And for the 135 dollars I paid for an EX+ condition copy from KEH, I would RUN to get one just to have it in your bag when what it does is exactly what you want.

here is the closest picture I got on the roll to what I had done with the Zuiko. you tell me which you like better:


Untitled by redisburning, on Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-24-2012   #2294
paulfish4570
Registered User
 
paulfish4570's Avatar
 
paulfish4570 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: On the Locust Fork of the Warrior River, Alabama
Age: 62
Posts: 9,587
they look dandy to me ...
__________________
i show what i see ...
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-24-2012   #2295
philosomatographer
Registered User
 
philosomatographer's Avatar
 
philosomatographer is offline
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 224
Quote:
Originally Posted by redisburning View Post
So, the ZM Planar offers you 2 more usable stops (2.8 and 4; the Zuiko IMO should be shot only at f5.6 unless you need the extra depth of field that f8 offers) and it's emergency aperture is about 3 stops faster
Hi,

Thanks for posting these results here - the Zuiko 50/3.5 is a fine lens indeed.

Without possessing any equipment to differentiate between the resolution of these two fine 50mm lenses, I find it a bit odd (arrogant?) for you to assert that the f/2.0 aperture of the ZM Planar, one of the finest lenses created, is an "emergency" aperture. On what do you base this?

You should learn to optically print your negatives - not only will this bring you great joy compared to scanning, you might then more accurately be able to make statements about lens performance, without all the troubles caused by scanning (which range from focus issues, uneven performance over scanner image field, massive exaggeration of film grain due to aliasing, etc).

Of course, you may just find (as most others have) that apart from minor character differences, just about all 50mm lenses have the same perfect performance at moderate apertures, and stop worrying about it :-) Other things, such as style of camera + focusing accuracy, and utility (close-focusing) make a much bigger difference.

Enjoy!
__________________
My tools: Leica M3 SS + CV Heliar 50/3.5.Mamiya RB67 + 37/4.5, 50/4.5, 65/4.5, 127/3.8, 140/4.5 Macro, 250/4.5. Linhof Technika V + Super-Angulons 75/8 and 90/8, APO-Symmar 150/5.6, Nikkor-T*ED 360/8.0 + 500/11 + 720/16.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-24-2012   #2296
redisburning
-
 
redisburning is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,551
I have in the past optically printed when I was still enrolled at a university. I currently own an enlarger, I just don't have the lenses for it.

the reason I say f2 is an emergency aperture is that I live in Texas where even with 100 speed film I can shoot at any aperture I want and still get easily hand-holdable shutter speeds. Since f4 is better than f2, I don't see much of a reason to shoot at f2. It's just like the Zuiko at 3.5. It's not bad. It's not the same as a first generation f1.2 at max aperture, so maybe emergency is too strong a word for it.

and I have actually paid for higher res scans with the Planar and shots at f2 were just fine (in fact, they were the best pictures I took that trip) but honestly if I could have stopped down I would have liked too. I just like 50s at mid apertures the best. I would share them, but theyre pictures of my family and I have reservations about doing so.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-24-2012   #2297
philosomatographer
Registered User
 
philosomatographer's Avatar
 
philosomatographer is offline
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 224
Quote:
Originally Posted by redisburning View Post
the reason I say f2 is an emergency aperture is that I live in Texas where even with 100 speed film I can shoot at any aperture I want and still get easily hand-holdable shutter speeds. Since f4 is better than f2, I don't see much of a reason to shoot at f2. It's just like the Zuiko at 3.5. It's not bad. It's not the same as a first generation f1.2 at max aperture, so maybe emergency is too strong a word for it.
Ah, well, I just wanted to clear that up - f/2.0 on the Zuiko 21mm f/2.0, for example, is an "emergency aperture" because it's plagued with severe optical aberrations at that aperture. The ZM planar is nearly optically perfect at every aperture, so a different word is indeed in order
__________________
My tools: Leica M3 SS + CV Heliar 50/3.5.Mamiya RB67 + 37/4.5, 50/4.5, 65/4.5, 127/3.8, 140/4.5 Macro, 250/4.5. Linhof Technika V + Super-Angulons 75/8 and 90/8, APO-Symmar 150/5.6, Nikkor-T*ED 360/8.0 + 500/11 + 720/16.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-24-2012   #2298
Jared
Registered User
 
Jared is offline
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10


OM1 - OM 28mm 3.5
__________________
http://www.aabb.be
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-24-2012   #2299
redisburning
-
 
redisburning is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,551
you should post more, the work on your site is excellent. that picture is nice too.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-25-2012   #2300
philosomatographer
Registered User
 
philosomatographer's Avatar
 
philosomatographer is offline
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 224
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared View Post


OM1 - OM 28mm 3.5
Jared, I have spent quite some time on your site. You have an immensely unique (and sometimes disturbing!) vision, such an eclectic mixture of finely-planned "installations" and what appear to be random snapshots - which obviously still have some thought behind them.

Do you use OMs for most of your work on your site?
__________________
My tools: Leica M3 SS + CV Heliar 50/3.5.Mamiya RB67 + 37/4.5, 50/4.5, 65/4.5, 127/3.8, 140/4.5 Macro, 250/4.5. Linhof Technika V + Super-Angulons 75/8 and 90/8, APO-Symmar 150/5.6, Nikkor-T*ED 360/8.0 + 500/11 + 720/16.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:03.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.