| Fuji X Series This forum is for fans of the rangefinder retrostyled Fuji X Series of digital cameras. |
 |
new x100 firmware - 1.21 (04/04/2012) |
 |
04-04-2012
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,405
|
new x100 firmware - 1.21 (04/04/2012)
http://www.fujifilm.com/support/digi.../finepix_x100/
The firmware update Ver.1.21 form ver1.20 incorporates the following issues:
When checking focus point by pushing AE-L/AF-L button in MF mode, following phenomena can be observed in relation to focus area settings. These phenomena are improved.
1.When the focus area is set to bottom right end position, the camera may hang up.
2.Even when the focus area is set to other area than above, focus may be hard to be established.
|
|
|
|
04-04-2012
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,405
|
Seems to correct some of the odd behavior reported in MF mode with the 1.20 update. Awesome that fuji is continually improving the x100!
|
|
|
|
04-04-2012
|
#3
|
|
camera hunter & gatherer
Nikon Bob is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,827
|
You know, I am trying to think if I have seen another digital camera that has so many firmware updates in such a sort time since it's intro. I think Fuji should be applauded for keeping on top of things and trying to give it's customers the best possible product.
Bob
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=557'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
04-04-2012
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
GaryLH is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,677
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikon Bob
You know, I am trying to think if I have seen another digital camera that has so many firmware updates in such a sort time since it's intro. I think Fuji should be applauded for keeping on top of things and trying to give it's customers the best possible product.
Bob
|
Plus 1. Could not agree more. They have made a good camera into what could be said to be a great camera
Gary
|
|
|
|
04-04-2012
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
GaryLH is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,677
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gavinlg
http://www.fujifilm.com/support/digi.../finepix_x100/
The firmware update Ver.1.21 form ver1.20 incorporates the following issues:
When checking focus point by pushing AE-L/AF-L button in MF mode, following phenomena can be observed in relation to focus area settings. These phenomena are improved.
1.When the focus area is set to bottom right end position, the camera may hang up.
2.Even when the focus area is set to other area than above, focus may be hard to be established.
|
Thanks for heads up.
Gary
|
|
|
|
04-04-2012
|
#6
|
|
convo killer
FA Limited is offline
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 549
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikon Bob
You know, I am trying to think if I have seen another digital camera that has so many firmware updates in such a sort time since it's intro. I think Fuji should be applauded for keeping on top of things and trying to give it's customers the best possible product.
|
but can't you also say that most other camera companies haven't made such oddball decisions as Fuji has with its cameras and therefore do not require as many firmware updates? most of the firmware has been to fix things and not to improve functionality (including "fixing" the AF speed).
that being said, i really like my X100 so far 
|
|
|
|
04-04-2012
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
kuvvy is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 56
Posts: 1,236
|
I've always updated as and when the firmware came out but having been out this weekend for the first time since the 1.20 I've noticed a number of things are out of whack. I'm considering a reset to hopefully go back to the previous update.
Things I (and others) have noticed;
Macro will not give a sharp result.
Shots don't look as clean as they were previously, more noise.
The dof scale is out of whack and does not show correctly.
Auto ISO no longer works and wont give me the shutter speed limit I set.
|
|
|
|
04-04-2012
|
#8
|
|
camera hunter & gatherer
Nikon Bob is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,827
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FA Limited
but can't you also say that most other camera companies haven't made such oddball decisions as Fuji has with its cameras and therefore do not require as many firmware updates? most of the firmware has been to fix things and not to improve functionality (including "fixing" the AF speed).
that being said, i really like my X100 so far 
|
Well, I am thinking Fuji is doing a lot better than Leica with the intro of the M8 as far as being quick on the fixes. In both cases though these were the first cameras in a new series so I guess they are usually more finicky than follow on camera in the same series. Goes with breaking new ground.
Bob
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=557'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
04-04-2012
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
tbhv55 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Devon, UK
Age: 57
Posts: 149
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kuvvy
I've always updated as and when the firmware came out but having been out this weekend for the first time since the 1.20 I've noticed a number of things are out of whack. I'm considering a reset to hopefully go back to the previous update.
Things I (and others) have noticed;
Macro will not give a sharp result.
Shots don't look as clean as they were previously, more noise.
The dof scale is out of whack and does not show correctly.
Auto ISO no longer works and wont give me the shutter speed limit I set.
|
I understand that it's possible to go back to the previous update, but there should be no need now... version 1.21 is out already today, to correct the cock-ups in version 1.20. I believe that all (or most) of your observations have been addressed, though I can't vouch for this.
Let's hope that they've got it right this time... it's such a superb camera, but their handling of firmware matters does seem to be a bit of a shambles.
|
|
|
|
 |
04-04-2012
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
kuvvy is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 56
Posts: 1,236
|
Thans tbhv55 for your reply. Obviously I would hope that you're right in regard to the version 1.21 putting all these things right but as yet I haven't read confirmation of this. Anyone out there know for sure?
|
|
|
|
04-04-2012
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
tbhv55 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Devon, UK
Age: 57
Posts: 149
|
@kuvvy... unfortunately, I still haven't had a chance to test it for myself, but the early comments from users on fujix-forum seem to be favourable.
For me, the main thing still missing is the ability to switch on/off the Auto ISO using the Fn button (or the re-assigned Raw button). If they were to implement this, then I reckon that I'd be happy enough, even if they did no more firmware updates...
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
04-05-2012
|
#12
|
|
Nikkor. What else?
Jan Van Laethem is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 285
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikon Bob
You know, I am trying to think if I have seen another digital camera that has so many firmware updates in such a sort time since it's intro. I think Fuji should be applauded for keeping on top of things and trying to give it's customers the best possible product.
Bob
|
But you could argue that Fuji (and other camera makers for that matter) should put a totally finished product on the market. It seems like the first buyers of any product nowadays are the ones that do the final test driving. I'd rather have that done by the engineers at the factory and wait a little bit longer for a camera to hit the shelves at my dealer.
__________________
Jan
*****************************************
Nikon S, S2, S2 black dial, S3 vintage black, S3 2000 black
Nikkor 3.5cm f/1.8, 3.5cm f/2.5, 5cm f/1.4, 50mm f/1.4 (2000 reissue), 10.5cm f/2.5 and 13.5cm f/3.5
Voigtländer SC-Skopar 21mm f/4, 50mm f/1.5 Nokton, 50mm f/2.5 Skopar and 85mm f/3.5 Lanthar
|
|
|
|
 |
04-05-2012
|
#13
|
|
camera hunter & gatherer
Nikon Bob is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,827
|
Jan
Hard to argue your point about a product ideally being perfect at introduction but how many are. Most if not all the digital cameras I have owned have had updates same as with my computer programs. I don't think that should diminish the praise Fuji is due for making a huge effort to satisfy it's customers.
Bob
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=557'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
04-05-2012
|
#14
|
|
Moderator
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,919
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FA Limited
but can't you also say that most other camera companies haven't made such oddball decisions as Fuji has with its cameras and therefore do not require as many firmware updates?
|
Well, Fuji is making cameras that no one else is making. There are no other cameras of its kind.
|
|
|
|
04-05-2012
|
#15
|
|
Lord of the Dings
batterytypehah! is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New England, USA
Posts: 1,796
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jan Van Laethem
But you could argue that Fuji (and other camera makers for that matter) should put a totally finished product on the market. It seems like the first buyers of any product nowadays are the ones that do the final test driving. I'd rather have that done by the engineers at the factory and wait a little bit longer for a camera to hit the shelves at my dealer.
|
It just doesn't work like that in software. I should know, my wife is a programmer...
__________________
WANTED: Fujimoto/Lucky 70M negative carrier
“You’ve never seen everything” – Bruce Cockburn
Contax IIa + Leica IIIf + M3 (project) + Zorki-1 (project) + Fuji GS645 + FED-2 + Vitomatic II + Revue 400SE + more + still more
|
|
|
|
04-05-2012
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
boomguy57 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Minneapolis
Age: 30
Posts: 1,153
|
Awesome...I love that Fuji is continuing updates and fixes long after launch, and even after the XP1 has launched. It does inspire confidence in any future Fuji purchases.
__________________
Website ~ Blog ~ Flickr ~ Tumblr ~ Books
Enough of the black-white arguments, let's examine the (18%) gray area. After all:
"Only a Sith deals in absolutes." - Obi-Wan Kenobi
|
|
|
|
04-07-2012
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
andy_v is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Age: 51
Posts: 346
|
Thank you, Fuji. Focusing with 1.21 is REALLY better!
|
|
|
|
04-15-2012
|
#18
|
|
Marcelo
umcelinho is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sao Paulo
Age: 30
Posts: 1,294
|
I'm getting completely inconsistent exposures after the update... sometimes the same scene will come out overexposed or underexposed, i was shooting at daytime in aperture priority and autoiso, using average exposure evaluation. before the firmware update i had never faced that kind of issue  major bummer! hope it's fixed in the next firmware, my fear is to be facing a sticky aperture blade issue here...
__________________
Gear:
• right eye
• right index finger
• cameras & lenses
What I've seen around: flickr
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 14:26. |
|
|