| Other RF Forum for the many Rangefinder cameras that do not have a dedicated RFF forum. |
 |
Agfa Karat Owners? |
 |
03-01-2012
|
#1
|
|
PF McFarland
farlymac is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 2,204
|
Agfa Karat Owners?
Just picked up a 36 today (with the 2.8 Solinar), and don't see a whole lot of traffic here about it. How many of you all have one, and your feelings about it?
PF
|
|
|
|
03-01-2012
|
#2
|
|
Dust bowl state of Texas
colyn is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: CowTown, Texas
Age: 59
Posts: 3,781
|
I have the S-K f/2 version.
These are excellent cameras.
The f/2 lens is the same as on the Retina IIIc/C cameras..
__________________
Colyn
Hot dry Texas....
Leica M2 | M3 x 2 | IIIa x 2 | IIIc | IIIf black dial | Canon P | Canon 7 |
Flickr
My website
My Gallery
|
|
|
|
03-01-2012
|
#3
|
|
Gerry
Gerry M is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Medford, Oregon, U. S.
Posts: 486
|
I have a Karat with the unusual/goofy split level rf windows. Solinar/Synchro-Compur. A solid build, but it needs to go to the hospital.
|
|
|
|
 |
Karat owner |
 |
03-01-2012
|
#4
|
|
It Is What It Is
Red Robin is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wrinkle City, Fla.
Age: 63
Posts: 542
|
Karat owner
I have a two or three of them I'll look tomorrow. I can't get to the camera room due to sleepers in there. Nice little cameras - well built, nice lenses. Just haven't gotten round to using them much yet. 
|
|
|
|
03-02-2012
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
citizen99 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 71
Posts: 253
|
I have a Karat 36 and am very pleased with it. I first got one with a Solinar lens like the OP's which as stated above is an excellent lens. I then got a 'parts' Karat 36 with the f2.0 Solagon lens; having resurrected that one with a fairly 'intrusive' repair, I sold on the Solinar one as being more 'original' and kept the Solagon one to use.
I have also tried the later Karat IV (with f2.0 Xenon), also very nice, but I found that the 'quirky' staggered rangefinder of the 36 actually suits me better. This linked picture was with the Solinar, hand-held, on my knees  .
Spider! by johnnyh4, on Flickr
|
|
|
|
03-02-2012
|
#6
|
|
PF McFarland
farlymac is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 2,204
|
That's one mighty fine looking spider there, Johnny. I've had a few of the Apotar lensed Agfa/Anscos, and have been happy with the results, so when I found this Solinar lensed model, I went ahead and got it (didn't hurt that it was 25% off). It will definitely need a teardown, as everything is stiff and draggy, and the bellows is a holy mess. The chrome is in halfway decent shape, but I'll know more after a surface cleaning. I was glad to find out that it takes the Retina sized filters, so I don't have to go get another set. Took forever to get the first ones. And it can share the hood from my Retinette.
If I don't mess up the repairs on this one, I may go on the hunt for an f2 model.
PF
|
|
|
|
04-01-2012
|
#7
|
|
PF McFarland
farlymac is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 2,204
|
A note of caution to anyone who decides to do their own repairs on the Karat 36.
When tearing down the camera for any repairs that require the removal of the front shroud (or maybe it's called the shutter/lens mount cover), remove the entire shutter as an assembly. Do not remove bits and pieces that extend from the shutter (such as the PC connector) so the shroud will clear. It is much harder to get things back in the proper order, and unless the shutter needs a complete stripdown for blade cleaning, not worth the trouble. Trust me.
PF
|
|
|
|
04-11-2012
|
#8
|
|
PF McFarland
farlymac is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 2,204
|
Finally got the Karat 36 back together. It's not my best effort so far, but it works. Now to run some film through it.
You can see the repairs and commentary at
http://www.flickr.com/photos/7699588@N07/sets/72157629429740568/
PF
|
|
|
|
04-12-2012
|
#9
|
|
PF McFarland
farlymac is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 2,204
|
Shot a test roll of Kodak Ultramax 400 (by golly, if it's leaking light, I should find out) today, and discovered I flipped the rear elements during reassembly. Oh well, it's an easy fix.
Do not adjust your screen!
Camp Roanoke Admin Cabin by br1078phot, on Flickr
Colorful Canoes by br1078phot, on Flickr
Stream Boulder by br1078phot, on Flickr
Looking Up by br1078phot, on Flickr
Cabin Path by br1078phot, on Flickr
Campground Morning by br1078phot, on Flickr
PF
|
|
|
|
04-13-2012
|
#10
|
|
hunter-gatherer
HuubL is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Netherlands
Age: 60
Posts: 2,065
|
I would keep that rear lens reversed. Wonderful images this way! 
|
|
|
|
04-13-2012
|
#11
|
|
PF McFarland
farlymac is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 2,204
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HuubL
I would keep that rear lens reversed. Wonderful images this way! 
|
Found out it wasn't the rear elements, but the second one. May have been like that since 1987, since I didn't take the front two apart from their shared housing. I flipped it around, double checked the focus, and ran a roll of BW400CN through it today. Will have results back by tomorrow.
PF
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:36. |
|
|