Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Philosophy of Photography

Philosophy of Photography Taking pics is one thing, but understanding why we take them, what they mean, what they are best used for, how they effect our reality -- all of these and more are important issues of the Philosophy of Photography. One of the best authors on the subject is Susan Sontag in her book "On Photography."

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Quick conversation with David Høgsholt
Old 04-13-2012   #1
David_Manning
Registered User
 
David_Manning's Avatar
 
David_Manning is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Aledo, Texas
Age: 47
Posts: 1,046
Quick conversation with David Høgsholt

David Høgsholt is a Danish photographer for Reportage by Getty. Some of David's work:

David's Getty page

Here is his website: http://www.davidhogsholt.com/

I had a good conversation with him regarding intimacy and shooting style. I'll post his reply, which I think is enlightening...

"Getting that level of intimacy into my work is exactly what I always strive for. I have begun teaching workshops and I always talk about how the specific action or look of a situation is not the most important thing in a good photo - it is how it feels being in that situation which makes the strong pic. Case in point, Mia - it is not the fact that she gets a shot of cocaine to her neck but how she feels about it which is important. That said, I do like to have specific impnformatio in my pics as well as I am out to tell stories which I want to communicate to a lot of people. But if the viewer feels the image in his or hers heart or stomach more than on an intellectual level I think the impact is bigger and longer lasting.
But the problem is I can't really tell how I manage to get those pics. It is def a lot of time spent, so I have a lot of frames to choose from. And I have also tried to strengthen my ability to recognize these emotions and shoot when they are the strongest - which is sometimes in very brief moments. I am basically "staring" a lot at people's facial expressions and then I move slowly and don't mind sitting around people for a long time.

But let's talk tech stuff.
The Ladyboys are shot on Mamiya 7 w. mostly a 65mm lens. A lot of flash cuz the lenses are slow and people are on the move or in badly lit rooms. In later years, I have tried doing less flash as it does become a bit too fashion looking. I think cuz it is medium format, colors and flash it looks like that but I have tried getting away from it.
The squares are on a old Rolleiflex often with closeup lenses. It is an amazing camera to work with as ppl let down their guard a lot easier in front of that old camera. I suspect it is because you are not kinda pointing your hole face and cam and lens directly at them but only this weird old cam whilst your body and head is lowered. Basically, you become less obtrusive and even a bit submissive while shooting that cam. I have a Thailand based friend who have shot the Rollei in Asia for years and he even thinks that because of Buddhism and the way you lower your head shooting the rollei that people see it as you paying respect. There could be some truth to that.
Film is Fuji color neg 400/800 sometime pushed a stop. Then scanned on imacon scanners.

Mia started out on film. All sorts, whatever I could get my hands on. Then it became dig, but I photoshop so that it is hard to tell the difference.
With dig, I shoot raw and convert in Lightroom and then a lot of post in PS.
Lenses are mostly a fixed 28mm or a 35mm. I find with Mia, I can get so close that 28mm becomes my go to lens. On other stories, 35mm is more appropriate.

I have the Fuji X100. I like the files but it is too slow and controls a bit weird. If they sorted that out in the Pro, it could be a great camera. Heard that autofocus is still not up there though... But not sure. The great thing is that you can actually shoot it as precise as an SLR cuz of the hybrid viewfinder. If Leica were cool they'd incorporate that into the M10, which I think they haven't. For that reason alone the Fuji Pro is a very interesting cam. And it focuses much closer than any Leica which is needed sometimes."
__________________
My Tumblr site
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-13-2012   #2
David_Manning
Registered User
 
David_Manning's Avatar
 
David_Manning is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Aledo, Texas
Age: 47
Posts: 1,046
I was thinking this was interesting info. I probably gave the post a really boring title.
__________________
My Tumblr site
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-11-2012   #3
andersju
Registered User
 
andersju is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Age: 27
Posts: 381
Didn't see this until now. Very interesting. He's taken some great pictures. Thanks for posting.
__________________
minorshadows.net | 2038.cc
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-11-2012   #4
Archiver
Registered User
 
Archiver is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 473
Definitely, thanks for posting that, David.
__________________
~Loving Every Image Captured Always~
Archiver on flickr
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 00:19.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.