Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Leica M Film Cameras

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

€4000 ($5500) starter kit
Old 02-27-2012   #1
elverket
Registered User
 
elverket is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 12
€4000 ($5500) starter kit

Hi!
I’m finally about to make the Leica jump, and I’m hoping for some expert advice before making my purchase. This is the situation:

I have €4000 (5500) to spend on a kit to get me started. This is the absolute limit, so no (more) stretching. I have decided on the M system, so Fuji etc. is out of the question.
So far I’m leaning towards an M8.2 (usually sold here in Norway for approx. €2000-2200) and a 35mm lens. As Norway is pretty dark several months a year and I shoot a lot indoors, I need something fast – at least f/2 IMO. I usually shoot people, urban environments, architecture and concerts, which I know is a lot to cover with one focal lenght, but I have a flexible Nikon kit as well that I’ll be keeping.
These are the options I’ve considered so far:

- 35mm Summicron IV or ASPH used.
- 35mm Summicron ASPH new. I live outside EU and go there regularly, so I could pick up one and have the local VAT refunded. The price difference would thus amount to €3-400 versus a used one. Worth it?
- 35mm Summilux, older model. Seems a bit big and heavy to me for a single lens setup, but the extra f-stop would surely be nice..
- 50mm Summilux pre-ASPH used. Not to many of those around here, but when they show up they seem to be in the same price range as the newer 35mm crons. Too narrow for a single lens combo with the M8?
- Two cheaper lenses, e.g. 35 and 90 Voiglander etc. I’m a bit hesitant to this option as the thought of only using one lens for a while actually seems quite compelling, and I want the best lens possible right away. I could allways save up for a while and buy a great 90mm or something in a couple of years.

Any thoughts on this would be much appreciated.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-27-2012   #2
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 20,516
The 35 pre-aspheric Summilux is pretty tiny.

Cheers,

R.
__________________
Now even more free photography information on www.rogerandfrances.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-27-2012   #3
hellomikmik
Registered User
 
hellomikmik is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Suomi
Posts: 191
there is also zeiss 35/2 zm.
or m9 + voigtlander 40.
or film body + 50/1.4 asph.
sorry, doesn't make it easier for you i guess
__________________
flexibility is life
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-27-2012   #4
RobVinc
I am a registered alien..
 
RobVinc's Avatar
 
RobVinc is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 146
Get an R-D1, an M4-P or M6(pre-TTL), an Canon 50/1.4 LTM and a Ultron 28/1.9..
If you can wait for good offers a VC 35/1.2 is maybe also still in the package..

And you still will have some money left for film and a bag, maybe even for a flash..
__________________
Leica M2 / Epson R-D1 / Fujica G690
Canon 35mm 2.0 LTM / VC Ultron 28mm 1.9
and some other seldomly used stuff

my profile on dA:
http://robvinc.deviantart.com/

my tumblr:
http://longnoserob.tumblr.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-27-2012   #5
elverket
Registered User
 
elverket is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 12
Thanks for the responses so far. As I have no experience with film, I think digital is a must for me...
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-27-2012   #6
emilsand
Registered User
 
emilsand is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 169
I've always liked the 35mm Summicron-M ASPH. It may not be the loudest thing out there, but it is a proper workhorse: Very reliable.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-27-2012   #7
Michiel Fokkema
Michiel Fokkema
 
Michiel Fokkema's Avatar
 
Michiel Fokkema is online now
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the Netherlands
Age: 49
Posts: 955
The summilux 35 pre-asph is not very useful wide open. It's soft and the 1.4 is there just for the times you really need it. In your case yo probably need it a lot.
How about a CV 32/1.2? If you want the best 35 go for the 35 ASPH, probably out of your budget or the summicron asph, super sharp wide open.
__________________
Some Pictures
The BLOG
The website
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-27-2012   #8
sojournerphoto
Registered User
 
sojournerphoto is offline
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,421
If you must have a digital M and want to shoot in low light then I think 4,000 euros is perhaps a bit low. M9 is likely to be out of the question, leaving the M8, but then you need shorter focal length lenses, which cost more with big apertures.

If you like the 50 focal length then you could do a lot worse than M9 plus Zeiss 50 C-Sonnar, but I think that you'll struggle to find one at that price. Alternatively, M8 plus Voigtlander Nokton 35 1.2 would be good (and cost less than a fast leica 35) or the Zeiss Biogon is also an excellent lens, but only f2.

If you want a 35 field of view (i.e. on 24 by 36mm frame) then you're into really expensive fast galss with M8.

Mike
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-27-2012   #9
Cagliostro73
Registered User
 
Cagliostro73 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Italy, Rome
Age: 41
Posts: 142
If I were you, I'd buy a RD1, a 21mm (VC) and a 40mm (summicron). Maybe you should add a industar 61ld, 55mm is a bit longer than 50mm standards.
Enjoy!
__________________
Buona Luce!
Best of Light!

www.flickr.com/zonasette

Epson RD-1s, Leica M2, summicron 40, 50, elmar 90, Fed 3b, industar 22, 61 L/D; jupiter 8, 9, 12.
_____________________________________
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-27-2012   #10
maddoc
... likes film.
 
maddoc's Avatar
 
maddoc is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 調布市
Age: 48
Posts: 6,739
I would try everyting to get the M9 and stick a 40mm M-Rokkor lens onto it, very close to the 35mm Summicron for a fraction of the cost. Should make for an excellent and universal set-up.
__________________
- Gabor

flickr
pBase
blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-27-2012   #11
randomm
Registered User
 
randomm's Avatar
 
randomm is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 404
If I had 4000 euros to spend, I'd buy an M9 body and _any_ lens to be honest. Then start worrying about other lenses somewhere down the line.

A well adjusted Jupiter-8 or Jupiter-3 would go a long way and only cost 30-150 bucks (low end for J8).
__________________
flickr
www.janiturunen.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-27-2012   #12
DSkjaeve
Registered User
 
DSkjaeve is offline
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 116
Where in Norway are you from? If you end up with the 8.2 then I'd go for a 35 (50 too narrow for all around).

Don't know if it would fit the budget but I have a near mint 35 summicron pre-asph for sale. Just PM me if it would become of interest.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-27-2012   #13
kevin_v
Registered User
 
kevin_v's Avatar
 
kevin_v is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by sojournerphoto View Post
If you must have a digital M and want to shoot in low light then I think 4,000 euros is perhaps a bit low. M9 is likely to be out of the question, leaving the M8, but then you need shorter focal length lenses, which cost more with big apertures.

If you like the 50 focal length then you could do a lot worse than M9 plus Zeiss 50 C-Sonnar, but I think that you'll struggle to find one at that price. Alternatively, M8 plus Voigtlander Nokton 35 1.2 would be good (and cost less than a fast leica 35) or the Zeiss Biogon is also an excellent lens, but only f2.

If you want a 35 field of view (i.e. on 24 by 36mm frame) then you're into really expensive fast galss with M8.

Mike
Doesn't Voigtlander have the 28mm f/2 Ultron ? - not exorbitantly expensive. With a 1.33 crop factor you get ~35 mm FOV. This is of course assuming the OP didn't consider the crop factor to begin with.
__________________
With kind regards,
Kevin
--
Computer Scientist, Camera Doodler
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-27-2012   #14
hausen
Registered User
 
hausen is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Auckland
Posts: 876
+1 on M9 plus 40 Rokkor.
__________________
David
Auckland, NZ

Far too many cameras & lenses!
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-27-2012   #15
astro8
Registered User
 
astro8's Avatar
 
astro8 is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sydney
Age: 52
Posts: 480
I'd buy leica lenses first (21SA or Elmarit and a 35 'lux or 'cron) and an R-D1 for a body and be very happy shooting that setup until I could afford the M9. I wouldn't bother with the M8.

The prices for lenses seem to be floating away but the M9 prices are coming down.

Once I had the M9 body and if I found the 21 too wide, I'd sell it and get a 50 'lux or 'cron.

....well, this is my plan but I already have a 50 'cron.
__________________
-Greg

My RFF Gallery

  Reply With Quote

Old 02-27-2012   #16
emilsand
Registered User
 
emilsand is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 169
To get a bit Norwegian here: I understand that the OP has a budget of 30000 NOK, which is around 5000 NOK less than what a used M9 goes for here. I've seen an M9 for 30000, but that one was sold in ten minutes.

Personally, I would take the M8 over the M8.2 any day of the week. You save quite a bit, and the sensor is the same.

If you are interested in a pre-asph 35mm Summicron I may have a lead for you (PM me). I was offered one that was pretty much "as new", with everything (box, papers, caps, hood). Also made in Germany, if that matters. Price was around 12000 NOK if I remember correctly. Not 6bit coded, and that may be a deal breaker if you're gonna use it on an M8/M8.2. Only reason for turning it down was that I found one for 8000 NOK (more of a user, really).

Other than that, a 35mm Nokton f/1.4 is also a good option, if you can work around the focus shift issues (I don't care about that, but I understand a lot of people do).
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-27-2012   #17
Araakii
Registered User
 
Araakii is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 507
Buy the M9 for $4999 that was here a while ago.

Then get a zeiss biogon 2.8 or rollei sonnar 2.8

It doesn't make any sense to buy crop bodies
__________________
My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-27-2012   #18
250swb
-
 
250swb is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The Peak District, United Kingdom
Posts: 862
Personally I wouldn't recommend any potentially quirky or non-Leica lenses to a newbie unless they were from the Zeiss range.

Remember chaps that this should be some sort of datum point by which a new user can then go on to experiment with Nokton's and Pre-Asph Summilux's and have a reliable known reference to guide him. So I would say get a 35mm Summicron, or a 50mm Summicron as your first lens for your M8.2.

Ideally I would spend the bulk of the cash on a dealer bought secondhand M9 then look for a bargain 50mm Summicron even if you have to sell the kids. Shop demo versions and good dealer secondhand ones are coming on the market now at around £3800, which I know blows your budget, but it really simplifies your lens choice later on by not needing to factor in the crop factor. It actually makes the subsequent lenses cheaper, because you can use a 21mm lens as a 21mm instead of having to spend a whole lot more on an even wider lens just to get back to a 21mm field of view. Likewise you aren't buying a more expensive 35mm Summicron to get to a 50mm style field of view on an M8 that would be dealt with by a cheaper 50mm Summicon on the M9. So after buying a few lenses an M9 could have saved you money and brought out the best in those lenses.



Steve
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-27-2012   #19
johannielscom
985 & 532/16
 
johannielscom's Avatar
 
johannielscom is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 6,719
[quote OP]
- Two cheaper lenses, e.g. 35 and 90 Voiglander etc. I’m a bit hesitant to this option as the thought of only using one lens for a while actually seems quite compelling, and I want the best lens possible right away. I could allways save up for a while and buy a great 90mm or something in a couple of years.
[/quote]

Define 'best lens'. If you want sharpness wide open, the Voigtlanders will be pretty close to the modern (and more expensive!) Leitz lenses, for a fraction of the cost. If you want 'dreamy' with lower contrast and slight light fall-off, the older Leitz lenses are what you need.

The M9 might be nice but too expensive, the M8 is a better choice budget-wise than the M8.2 because the sensor and software are the same.
__________________
Cheers, Johan Niels

My photography & gear articles: www.johanniels.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-28-2012   #20
jarski
Registered User
 
jarski is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,959
one more vote for M9. once thats home, upgrade lenses gradually finances allowing.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-28-2012   #21
elverket
Registered User
 
elverket is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 12
Thank you all for the responses so far. Very interesting and lots to think about.:-)
As I several suggesting getting the M9 as a starting point: Would anyone care to elaborate a little..? Why not e.g. stick with an M8 or RD-1 until (eventually) the M10 or whatever brings the M9 prices significantly down and trade when I have the money? Of course that would bring the M8 prices down as well, but probably not as much as the M9..? In addition it seems to me that the Leica lens prices still are going in the opposite direction, getting more expensive year by year. Am I missing something here..? I can se the argument regarding (fast) wide angles on M8 vs M9, but I don't require anything wider than "normal" for now (35-50mm).
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-28-2012   #22
semordnilap
Registered User
 
semordnilap's Avatar
 
semordnilap is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 738
I'd get an M8 and cv 28/2. Or, if you can find a $2000 M8 and a $3000-$3500 used 28 summicron, you'll be fine. I hope to have some time this week in Oslo to shoot that exact combo, but my time here is just getting filled more and more! Maybe friday afternoon... hopefully the weather will cooperate.

I would wait on an M9–isn't the next M supposed to show up at photokina in the fall? If it's a stretch, you won't lose as much on the M8 as you will on the M9. I agree that it's better to get into the glass now–the prices just keep going up.
__________________
________________
______________
____________
__________
________
______

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-28-2012   #23
braver
Registered User
 
braver's Avatar
 
braver is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 330
I think the OP is making a lot of sense. Cameras are becoming cheaper and cheaper, while lenses go up. As camera systems go, you could do a lot worse than an m8.2 and a 35 cron. The cron will stay with you for ever and if need be the camera can be exchanged for an m9 later on.

The pre-asph 35 crons are great with b&w film, but the prices are becoming ridiculous. I think it makes much more sense to spend that last bit more on the asph. It is a wonderful lens you'll have a lot of fun with. You can get em mint for not much more than a v4, and for another bit more you get 2 years of factory warranty. You sound confident about sticking to this lens for a while, so I'd say it makes sense to make the investment.
__________________
Koen - portfolio - flickr - 1X.com
Leica M6 TTL .58, 28 Elmarit asph, 40 Summicron-C
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-28-2012   #24
Viktor Sebastian
~
 
Viktor Sebastian is offline
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Iceland
Posts: 328
M9 + any zeiss F2 lens, and have regrets at photokina.

or

M8 + 28mm Summicron
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-28-2012   #25
randomm
Registered User
 
randomm's Avatar
 
randomm is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 404
I would not shoot the CV 28/2 on digital. Wonderful on film (have owned one), but the focus shift on digital would be too much for me... you more or less cannot shoot close up with f2.8-5.6 due to the shift.
__________________
flickr
www.janiturunen.com
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:16.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.