Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Leica M Film Cameras

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 02-22-2012   #126
Keyne
Registered User
 
Keyne's Avatar
 
Keyne is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Hicks View Post
Equally, I find it surprising that you get such a reaction so often. At most, I'd guess that half a dozen people a year comment on my Leicas. Though once I did have two people in one day (in Lijiang) comment on my Alpa.

Next question: is it probable that the people who notice Leicas are the ones who are going to steal them?

And, just because someone knows that Leicas are 'expensive cameras', it does not mean that they can easily tell an M2 (a few hundred dollars) from an M9 (several thousand).

Don't get me wrong: I'm not arguing with you. It's just a line of inquiry that I'd be interested to see developed.

Cheers,

R.
Good question. I guess I assume that if they know its a Leica they know it's valuable. I wonder if I would feel the same way with a Canon pro camera around my neck and someone says "Canon!". I guess IMO Leicas are still pretty rare, so if someone notices I do wonder... hmmm are they going to rob me or just interested.
__________________
Leica M8, Zeiss 35 2.8 & Voigtlander 28 1.9
My Flickr gallery: http://www.flickr.com/photos/24241390@N03/
My blog - 1st year with a Leica M:
http://leicakeyne.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-22-2012   #127
kbg32
neo-romanticist
 
kbg32's Avatar
 
kbg32 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 4,852
Leicas last a lifetime. I've still have and use my 1967 M4. I hope to pass it on to my son.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-22-2012   #128
n5jrn
Registered User
 
n5jrn is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keyne View Post
It's interesting that you mention that. I was surprised how many people notice a Leica. For instance, when I was traveling in Australia 3 people in the Circular Quay area (waterfront around the Opera House) said "Ohhh Leica" one guy even called out to me from his cafe seat. Nice guy and he frequents RFF and was ordering his own M. That being said I find it more concerning than positive. I would prefer people didnt know I was carrying a $2,500 camera body + lens.
I get far more comments from strangers about my IIIf than I do about my Panasonic LX3 or my two Pentax SLR's. Most of them are expressing surprise I can still find film for such an old camera (apparently many folks are unaware of how long 135 film has been around), or are wondering what kind of camera it is. Maybe 10 to 20 percent of the comments mention Leica explicitly.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-26-2012   #129
Messsucherkamera
Registered User
 
Messsucherkamera is offline
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 108
It's not just the well heeled or status seeking elitists who own and Leicas. Some save and scrape for years to acquire them. It's a matter of priorities for some. For some, it's a photographic quality of life thing.

Some people have boats. Some have motorcycles. Some have fly rods. Some have woodworking shops. Then there are those who have Leicas - with no thought of status.

As for those who have gold plated cameras - some people have a need to flaunt their affluence as well as their affinity for tackiness and poor taste.
__________________
"The winter leeks
have been washed white
how cold it is!"


- Matsuo Basho
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-26-2012   #130
Messsucherkamera
Registered User
 
Messsucherkamera is offline
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 108
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald_H View Post
As said, the results don't justify the price in my mind. Not even in the case of my second hand kit I looked long and hard for. But granted, it is damn nice to own something like this:


Camera porn - Recovered Leica M2 w. Summicron DR by Ronald_H, on Flickr
I usually prefer plain black Leicas but I have to admit that your chrome and blue M is awfully nice!
__________________
"The winter leeks
have been washed white
how cold it is!"


- Matsuo Basho
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-26-2012   #131
Eric T
Registered User
 
Eric T is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 640
The only Leica item I have purchase new was an M8 in 2007. I have purchased six Leica lenses used. Lenses from the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s are reasonable and are good enough quality for me. I agree with Tom that the CV lenses are terrific. I buy those new, mostly the wide focal lengths - 15, 25, and 28mm.
And don't forget to look at the Leica R series. I just bought a near mint Leica R8 for under $600. I just couldn't pass that up. I found two reasonable used R lenses, develop my own C-41, and expanding my horizons a bit.
__________________
Eric Triplett in sunny Florida
Mostly shoot with Sigma Merrill cameras, Fuji XT-1, X-Pro1, Fuji GF-670, and Lytro Illum.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-26-2012   #132
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 20,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by Messsucherkamera View Post
It's not just the well heeled or status seeking elitists who own and Leicas. Some save and scrape for years to acquire them. It's a matter of priorities for some. For some, it's a photographic quality of life thing.

Some people have boats. Some have motorcycles. Some have fly rods. Some have woodworking shops. Then there are those who have Leicas - with no thought of status.

As for those who have gold plated cameras - some people have a need to flaunt their affluence as well as their affinity for tackiness and poor taste.
Nicely phrased!

Cheers,

R.
__________________
Now even more free photography information on www.rogerandfrances.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-26-2012   #133
redisburning
-
 
redisburning is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,603
this is a fascinating topic to me. my parents must have done a poor job of installing me with traditional socio-economic values because I buy what I perceive to be the best almost exclusively.

I remember as a younger child when my parents had just gotten out of grad school and we didnt have much money that I was the kid who got two gifts a year. One on my birthday in June, and one on Christmas. And I mostly got exactly the two things I wanted, which I perceived to be the best. I rarely asked for stuff other than those two things, and I brow-beat it into my parents.

Here I am some 2 decades later and Im the same way. My Dad continues to try and teach me the value of settling but I dont think it will ever stick.

After I finished a degree last year I got a little job and wanted to buy my own camera. I was disappointed with my first foray into medium format (6x6 no less). I had convinced myself with the whole "any MF camera trounces any 35mm camera" line of thinking and was heavily disillusioned to say the lest. So, I decided that for this, my camera that I would buy with a serious commitment towards it being "my camera" I would buy the camera I thought was the best, since it was, as is rare for me, truly my money to spend.

It costs what it costs. There is little use worrying about it beyond whether or not you can afford it or not and if you are paying around or below market value.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-27-2012   #134
awslee
Registered User
 
awslee's Avatar
 
awslee is offline
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 226
At least for now, for the older Leica fast lens, it is better than putting money in the bank since the bank's return is so bad. At least I can touch the lens, take it out for some shooting and enjoy it.
__________________
Andrew

Various FF digital and film cameras
Various old cine lens
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-27-2012   #135
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit's Avatar
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 41
Posts: 14,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by Messsucherkamera View Post
As for those who have gold plated cameras - some people have a need to flaunt their affluence as well as their affinity for tackiness and poor taste.
Haha, funny.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-27-2012   #136
goamules
Registered User
 
goamules is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,020
I think a lot of people concentrate on the higher cost of Leicas, and spend a lot of brain bits justifying their much higher price. I've have 5 Canon rangefinders that worked fine, never had to CLA a one. I shot a lot of pictures. I bought a reasonably priced IIIc and after a CLA, shutter replacement, and now light leak repair I need to justify the sanity of trying to get this one working. I knew before, and confirmed now, Leicas are not some magic super-camera that are many times better than other cameras. It's just a nice camera that for whatever reasons costs a lot more than competing cameras that do just as well. So justification discussions arise.
__________________
Garrett

My Flickr Photos
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-27-2012   #137
noimmunity
registered niche user
 
noimmunity's Avatar
 
noimmunity is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lyon/Taipei
Age: 51
Posts: 2,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Hicks View Post
I've never been sure exactly whom they thought they were going to impress, though....But unless you're carrying a gold-plated camera, who is going to notice you're carrying a Leica?
In certain situations, I've noticed that people prefer to let themselves be "exposed" (i.e., photographed) by someone who exudes the respectful aura of knowing what they're doing. The name "Leica" provides a putative indicator of this respectful aura that is easily accessible for the uninitiated.

As I started getting into rangefinders, I noticed, in east Asian cities, that the name "Leica" makes a general impression. In quite a few instances, people would be much more willing to let themselves be photographed in candid situations when they were aware that the lens or the body was a "Leica". People with public images, such as performers and politicians, could be especially sensitive to brand-name recognition.

However, it would be puerile to imagine that esoteric brand recognition is the only way to achieve this effect. As I made slight progress in my photographic skills (which remain rewardingly amateurish), I discovered that there are other ways to achieve a similar end result. People will notice right away what kind of rapport the photographer has with her equipment (not to mention the subject), and this can be as equally or more convincing than brand.

The only two Leica lenses I now own (24/3.8 and 135/4) are used almost exclusively for landscape applications. Do they make the sun shine brighter and the birds chirp louder? Yeah, right!
__________________
jon 小強

Fuji XP1 8/14/23/35/55-200 (x1.5)
Sigma DP Merrill 19/30/50 (x1.5)
ZI, R4A 24/50/90 + 21/35/85 and a 40.


搬到畫國後免疫系統變得超強,所過的生活宅到不行!

The old adage says: Seeing is believing. To me, that doesn't mean that the world seen is the truth, it means rather that seeing is a field in which the purity of heart is expressed--or not, depending upon whatever happens to cloud that purity at any given moment.

flickr
Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-28-2012   #138
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 20,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by noimmunity View Post
In certain situations, I've noticed that people prefer to let themselves be "exposed" (i.e., photographed) by someone who exudes the respectful aura of knowing what they're doing. The name "Leica" provides a putative indicator of this respectful aura that is easily accessible for the uninitiated.

As I started getting into rangefinders, I noticed, in east Asian cities, that the name "Leica" makes a general impression. In quite a few instances, people would be much more willing to let themselves be photographed in candid situations when they were aware that the lens or the body was a "Leica". People with public images, such as performers and politicians, could be especially sensitive to brand-name recognition.

However, it would be puerile to imagine that esoteric brand recognition is the only way to achieve this effect. As I made slight progress in my photographic skills (which remain rewardingly amateurish), I discovered that there are other ways to achieve a similar end result. People will notice right away what kind of rapport the photographer has with her equipment (not to mention the subject), and this can be as equally or more convincing than brand.
Intriguing: thanks. But here are two thoughts prompted by your observations:

To those NOT familiar with Leicas, maybe they look more like point-and-shoots. i.e. less threatening than massive DSLRs

Those who shoot with Leicas may be more familiar with their cameras, because they have chosen an out-of-the-ordinary camera, i.e., they have already thought quite hard about which camera to use, and how.

This is not to disagree with your points for a moment, but rather (I hope), to add a little to them.

Cheers,

R.
__________________
Now even more free photography information on www.rogerandfrances.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-28-2012   #139
mynikonf2
...new old stock
 
mynikonf2's Avatar
 
mynikonf2 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ...a resident of the Virgo Galactic Supercluster or thereabouts...
Age: 63
Posts: 554
I can not justify the over inflated prices of Leica glass. This is the main reason I no longer own Leica equipment. The cameras are not as much an issue in the cost of owning Leica gear, they average about the same cost as the Nikon SP (original in excellent condition or the the modern reissue). I respectfully have to state, that there is no reasonable explanation for the inflated cost of Leica glass, that can satisfy this photographers wallet. I have used many different manufactures' glass, over the years and find that I do not lack nor want for any quality by my use of Nikon glass, including cost of ownership.

p.s. in all fairness, there is some Nikon glass that fall well within that "inflated cost" category too, mostly driven by collector demand.
__________________
Mike
N.H.S. member



“Light scratches consistent with age and wear”
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-28-2012   #140
kossi008
Photon Counter
 
kossi008's Avatar
 
kossi008 is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dresden, Germany
Age: 48
Posts: 722
I don't. No Leica glass in my collection. And the only one I ever owned was a 1939 Summitar for 200 €, which was quite worth the money.
__________________
Photon Counter
My flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/25547701@N08/
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-28-2012   #141
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 20,516
Let's see... 35 Summilux, 50 Summarit (strictly my wife's), 65 Elmar, 75 Summicron, 90 Summicron, 90 Thambar, 135 Elmarit-M. The Summilux, Summarit and Summicrons were all bought new. Then there was my 21/2.8, stolen in Russia, again bought new. Yes, I'd say they were worth the money, and that in most cases, there are no alternatives that deliver quite the same advantages (tiny 35mm, sharp, fast 75 and 90, soft focus 90). But then, some of my non-Leica lenses from Zeiss, Voigtländer and Kobalux also have unique advantages, such as the 50/1.5 C-Sonnar. Yer pays yer money and yer takes yer choice.

Cheers,

R.
__________________
Now even more free photography information on www.rogerandfrances.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-28-2012   #142
straightmp
Registered User
 
straightmp's Avatar
 
straightmp is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 283
"Yer pays yer money and yer takes yer choice."

absolutely right, roger. no justification necessary. just buy it or leave it.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-28-2012   #143
noimmunity
registered niche user
 
noimmunity's Avatar
 
noimmunity is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lyon/Taipei
Age: 51
Posts: 2,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Hicks View Post
Intriguing: thanks. But here are two thoughts prompted by your observations:

To those NOT familiar with Leicas, maybe they look more like point-and-shoots. i.e. less threatening than massive DSLRs

Those who shoot with Leicas may be more familiar with their cameras, because they have chosen an out-of-the-ordinary camera, i.e., they have already thought quite hard about which camera to use, and how.

This is not to disagree with your points for a moment, but rather (I hope), to add a little to them.

Cheers,

R.
I think that is really true: that extra effort required to break away from the pack in the first place usually translates into a more substantial involvement with the whole process. Not to say that people who use DSLRs lack such involvement, but we have all heard time and again how the simplicity of the RF format actually requires greater deliberation and produces, in a lot of instances, much greater user enjoyment.

But of course, today, RF doesn't have to be Leica.
__________________
jon 小強

Fuji XP1 8/14/23/35/55-200 (x1.5)
Sigma DP Merrill 19/30/50 (x1.5)
ZI, R4A 24/50/90 + 21/35/85 and a 40.


搬到畫國後免疫系統變得超強,所過的生活宅到不行!

The old adage says: Seeing is believing. To me, that doesn't mean that the world seen is the truth, it means rather that seeing is a field in which the purity of heart is expressed--or not, depending upon whatever happens to cloud that purity at any given moment.

flickr
Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-28-2012   #144
doolittle
Registered User
 
doolittle's Avatar
 
doolittle is offline
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ireland
Age: 42
Posts: 562
Never considered justifying Leica prices. It's a question of how much the asking price is, how much I'm willing to pay and how much I have to spend. I have only bought Leica equipment second hand, but I think it applies equally to new equipment.

Now justifying to myself why I need the particular item is another matter!
__________________
--

fixerofshadows.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-28-2012   #145
klaz
Registered User
 
klaz's Avatar
 
klaz is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 9
once I heard a photographer pointed out, "if you have $100, you should spend $30 on your gears and $70 for travel, because if you spend $100 on your gears, you'll end up photographing your bathroom everyday"... Use your judgement and base on your budget.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-28-2012   #146
MikeL
Go Fish
 
MikeL's Avatar
 
MikeL is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by klaz View Post
once I heard a photographer pointed out, "if you have $100, you should spend $30 on your gears and $70 for travel, because if you spend $100 on your gears, you'll end up photographing your bathroom everyday"... Use your judgement and base on your budget.








Attached Images
File Type: jpg bathroom3.jpg (17.2 KB, 89 views)
File Type: jpg bathroom2.jpg (27.4 KB, 85 views)
File Type: jpg bathroom1.jpg (20.6 KB, 85 views)
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-28-2012   #147
kemal_mumcu
Registered User
 
kemal_mumcu's Avatar
 
kemal_mumcu is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dakar
Posts: 263
Leica prices are way out there now. I now look to Zeiss as the best "bang for buck". Still though, I hate buying twice and I'd just as soon buy the Leica piece if I know in my heart that it's what I'll want to buy in the end.

Some people are happy to buy their $50 fixed lens rangefinders and yet spend thousands on going to restaurants. Me, I prefer to spend my thousands (if I have any) on a nice lens and spend the $50 on paninis. One puts their money where their heart is. My rational is that a Leica lens is something that I'll use one whatever camera body for the next 40 years so why not buy once and be done with it.

I bought one Leica lens brand new only once in my life: a 75 summarit when Leica was discounting the lenses. Since then life has been such that I haven't been able to repeat this. It's OK. I'll get along just fine with my cheapo Zuikos, Zeiss' and CV's. If I ever come into money again I'll buy another Leica (maybe). Till then I'll enjoy my summarit @ f3.4 along with the rest of the other lenses too. I'm content.

Buy the best you can afford.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-28-2012   #148
klaz
Registered User
 
klaz's Avatar
 
klaz is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeL View Post








Looks like you have budget to travel to different bathrooms
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-28-2012   #149
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit's Avatar
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 41
Posts: 14,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by klaz View Post
once I heard a photographer pointed out, "if you have $100, you should spend $30 on your gears and $70 for travel, because if you spend $100 on your gears, you'll end up photographing your bathroom everyday"... Use your judgement and base on your budget.
Well, that depends on where you live... and also, as other have pointed out, bathrooms have been photographed by well known photographers forever. Living in NYC, I don't feel like I need to travel to make photos.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-04-2012   #150
stormbytes
Registered User
 
stormbytes's Avatar
 
stormbytes is offline
Join Date: Jan 2012
Age: 39
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by mugent View Post
I think others have summed it up well, but my experience is that after owning a Leica, I sold it, the extra cash wasn't worth it to me, the money can be put to better use.
If the owning of a Summilux (or whatever), makes you happy, then keep it, if it makes you feel uneasy, like it did for me, then get rid of it.

I get slightly uneasy feelings when eating at expensive restaurants, so I choose not to now.
Very well put. I feel the same way.
I purchased an M6 and it had some issues, so I decided to return it. Sadly, I missed the boat for buyer's remorse on the Summicron 50mm/2, but I got it for a fairly good price and there are practically no version-4's floating around that are both made in Germany and 6-bit coded. I'm not too worried about getting my money out of it.

Cost was a major factor and that 'uneasy' feeling really gnawed at me. I own an FM3a with ai/ai-s 28/35/50/85 lenses. Its as complete a kit as I'll ever need for 35 and if I want to break the quality barriers, I've got my 501cm with Zeiss Planar 120mm/4.

Relief at cashing out is what I'm looking forward to. Nice to see I'm not alone!
__________________
-
Daniel
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:13.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.