 |
more 18mm photos |
 |
02-19-2012
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
bruceh is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 10
|
more 18mm photos
http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=XPro...32694969%40N02
Looking good!
Of course, they're not full-sized raw photos so they don't count. No lens should be judged except by 200% pixel peeping in the corners... 
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Dirk is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 308
|
Link doesn't work.
__________________
Leica M3, Bessa R2m, Minox 35GT, Konica C35, Yashica GSN, Minolta Hi-Matic E, Rolleiflex 3.5F, Leicaflex SL2, Nikon F, etc., etc...
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
kai.zorki is offline
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bonn - germany
Age: 23
Posts: 60
|
It does work.
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
jippiejee is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 595
|
I still think this camera will have the same problem as the X10 with white disc blooming on the exr sensor, something the most recent firmware update was supposed to solve, but didn't. This camera will have the same exr engine. Too bad the pictures weren't posted in a larger format, but the reflection in the water makes me very suspicious:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jorge-k...ream/lightbox/
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
celluloidprop is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 883
|
I can't believe the sun reflecting off of water makes for white highlights!
That looks perfectly normal for any camera, digital or film.
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
willie_901 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,987
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jippiejee
I still think this camera will have the same problem as the X10 with white disc blooming on the exr sensor, something the most recent firmware update was supposed to solve, but didn't. This camera will have the same exr engine. Too bad the pictures weren't posted in a larger format, but the reflection in the water makes me very suspicious:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jorge-k...ream/lightbox/
|
So is the XP1 not supposed to show a white disc when a circular specular highlight is over exposed?
What do you expect to see?
What do you define as blooming?
How do you define the difference between blooming any an overexposed region?
Do you have examples from your photos where circular specular hightlight are accurately portrayed?
Your comments make no sense to me whatsoever.
|
|
|
|
 |
02-19-2012
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
fearofhummingbird is offline
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 11
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jippiejee
I still think this camera will have the same problem as the X10 with white disc blooming on the exr sensor, something the most recent firmware update was supposed to solve, but didn't. This camera will have the same exr engine. Too bad the pictures weren't posted in a larger format, but the reflection in the water makes me very suspicious:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jorge-k...ream/lightbox/
|
jippie - it is not the same EXR engine. They are totally different animals. Do your homework before you shoot off your mouth. The only thing common between the two camera's is that Fuji liked to use EXR for both.
It appears you are exhibiting the same jealousy that many others are displaying. Presumably there is resentment that this camera is garnering such interest and it just isn't your thing.
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
tom.w.bn is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,620
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jippiejee
I still think this camera will have the same problem as the X10 with white disc blooming on the exr sensor, something the most recent firmware update was supposed to solve, but didn't. This camera will have the same exr engine. Too bad the pictures weren't posted in a larger format, but the reflection in the water makes me very suspicious:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jorge-k...ream/lightbox/
|
What problem do you see here?
__________________
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
jippiejee is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 595
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom.w.bn
What problem do you see here?
|
The picture format is really small, but I do suspect that the white disc blooming will be the same problem on this camera as it is on the X10: big white discs when exposed the bright points, and that firmware updates will not solve it:
http://www.dcresource.com/news/newsitem.php?id=4467
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
tom.w.bn is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,620
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jippiejee
The picture format is really small, but I do suspect that the white disc blooming will be the same problem on this camera as it is on the X10: big white discs when exposed the bright points, and that firmware updates will not solve it:
http://www.dcresource.com/news/newsitem.php?id=4467
|
You mean the same thing as in the X100? If you consider this a problem... I don't
DSCF0557 von tom.w.bn auf Flickr
__________________
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
jippiejee is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 595
|
No that's not the same, and the problem has not been reported about the X100. It means that small bright points turn up as big bright white orbs.
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#14
|
|
curmudgeonly optimist
semilog is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,224
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jippiejee
No that's not the same, and the problem has not been reported about the X100. It means that small bright points turn up as big bright white orbs.
|
Show us an example of an X1 photo where what you describe is actually happening, and we may pay attention. But please don't just make things up. It doesn't help anyone, including you.
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
jippiejee is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 595
|
I linked to the car hood in the Polish photo session. See above.
|
|
|
|
 |
Blown highlights nothing more |
 |
02-19-2012
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
fearofhummingbird is offline
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 11
|
Blown highlights nothing more
Seriously blown highlights from the set illumination obviously. Nothing like orbs. Orbs are perfectly round with a very odd black outline. The X10 and XPro1 are both branded Fujifilm, but the sensors are entirely different, probably not even manufactured by the same vendor.
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,395
|
http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=x-pro1&ss=2&s=rec
There are more and more x-pro1's in the wild now, and flickr is starting to get some examples. To me, looks like the 35mm f1.4 is superb, the 18mm f2 is excellent, and the dynamic range, noise, performance and color out of the camera are seriously great.
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#18
|
|
Registered User
jippiejee is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 595
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fearofhummingbird
Seriously blown highlights from the set illumination obviously.
|
I hope you're right. Would love this camera to be good.
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#19
|
|
curmudgeonly optimist
semilog is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,224
|
^--- what Gavin said -- exactly. And the impressive thing about that photo is *not* the specular highlight on the fender. It's the remarkable suppression of veiling flare with that huge light source in the frame.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 15:12. |
|
|