Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Leica M Film Cameras

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

My first Leica
Old 02-19-2012   #51
randolph45
Registered User
 
randolph45's Avatar
 
randolph45 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sacramento Calif
Posts: 829
My first Leica

Hmm.I will have my first Leica at the end of this month.A used 1985 M6 using LTM Canon glass I already own.I'm sure Leica glass is great stuff. With my skill set it probably would be wasted on me

Your social security is paying for this by the way
__________________
I finally realized why my photographs are so bad! It's not the equipment

Last edited by randolph45 : 02-19-2012 at 13:25. Reason: add line
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-19-2012   #52
Peter^
Registered User
 
Peter^'s Avatar
 
Peter^ is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 265
I don't buy Leica, and can't imagine I ever would.
__________________
- Peter
----------------
Zeiss Ikon, Olympus OM-1n, Konica C35, NEX-7

See my pictures at:
http://peter.andrews.ipernity.com

“Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-19-2012   #53
Richard G
Registered User
 
Richard G's Avatar
 
Richard G is offline
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: 37,47 S
Posts: 3,374
How many new cameras have come and gone in the 36 years I have been using the M2 and tabbed Summicron? How much more then $350 for the 2006 CLA would I have spent on recurrent new systems........? An M Leica might be the cheapest camera there is from an amortization point of view.
__________________
Richard
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-19-2012   #54
emayoh
Rangefindered User
 
emayoh's Avatar
 
emayoh is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 108
Interesting question. How do we justify anything? Why get out of bed in the morning? Can you justify a Leica over a Canon? A Porsche over a Honda? Why not a bicycle? Why not walk? Why not a pencil and paper? There is no choice that can't be second guessed. Emerson noted that our eye was placed here and now to testify of the particular ray of light that fell upon it. So, know that the photo you take could be taken by no other being but you, because nobody is where you are when you click the shutter. If you're a Leica user, be that. Be a photographer. Just be yourself.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-19-2012   #55
Tom A
RFF Sponsor
 
Tom A's Avatar
 
Tom A is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 70
Posts: 5,505
We should not forget that 12-15 years ago, there was no alternatives to Leica M-mount lenses. You bought what you needed (or wanted) and used it. Sometimes used and sometimes new.
With the arrival of the Konica M lenses, the Voigtlander Cosina lenses and later the Zeiss M-mounts, we suddenly had alternatives, and often at more palatable prices.
I have bought a fair bit of M-lenses new, just because I needed them - but I have also gotten rid of a lot of lenses by Leica when I found alternatives by other makers that did what I wanted them to do at much less cost - and in some cases better performance too.
At the moment I have 35f2 Asph, 50 Lux Asph and 75f2 Apo Asph and the new Elmar 21f3.4 - all bought new - but at prices that in most cases are 1/3 to 1/4 of what they are today. I would not have paid $4000+ for a Summilux 50f1.4 or the 75f2. However good they are, they are not THAT good. The Summicron 35f2 Asph was bought new when it came out and I have kept it because it is my "reference" lens for f2 35's in terms of sharpness etc - but I cant say that I am enamored with it. Fairly unpleasant "jagged" look to it in bl/w and vastly overly contrasty with color.
The Elmar 21f3.4 was one of those items that I had to have. Having been "attached" to the Super Angulon 21f3.4 for more than 40 years. this was more of a sentimental purchase. Is it as good as a SA 21/3.4 - yes, in many ways it is and in terms of performance at f3.4 better - BUT, I could happily have survived without it.
The 50f1.4 Asph is now "silly" priced. Yes, it is probably the best 50 mm lens ever made - but what would you be shooting that made you need that! Portraits - no way, nobody looks that good. With film you have to use 25/50 and maybe 100 iso to see it, and I find that I grab my C Sonnar 50f1.5 more often than the Asph 50f1.4.
As to justification, it is personnal. If I have the money floating around, yes - it is nice to get those silverboxes with neat padding etc - and those leather cases smell nice.
It is also nice to know that the equipment one uses is better than the skills one has. Cant ever blame the glass - as if a client would care!
I shoot black/white, normally a 320/400 iso film and there are few shots I have taken where the lens was the deciding factor in quality!!!
The optics we have available now are in most cases so good that the quality of the image is more depending on the users skill than the camera and/or glass.
Today I wanted to finish of a roll of the ORWO 74 (400 iso film stock) and I took a LHSA M6 TTL and the Summicron 75f2 and an hour walk. I thought about this as I was walking around snapping - it is a package that would cost me $6-7000 to replace if it got lost! About 4 times what my car is worth! I could have taken a Bessa R3M and my Heliar 75f1.8 or even the 75f2.5 and most likely could not have found a major difference between the images.
Ok, once you have the 50f1.4 Asph and the pain of paying for it have subsided, just use it. That what it is for.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-19-2012   #56
whitecat
Lone Range(find)er
 
whitecat's Avatar
 
whitecat is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,340
I have had perhaps 7-8 new Leica lenses over the years. I would never buy one at today's prices. I thought I was really going overboard when I paid $1895.00 for the 75mm Summilux years ago, or over $2,000.00 for the Noctilux. Look at the pricing now. I at the time felt that the prices were justified for an advanced amateur with a dedication to great optics and workmanship. Today the price of an M body with a computer chip and sensor inside is just too much. The M7 and MP have gone over the edge also. I will mention that the workmanship in a Leica body is the best I have ever experienced. It's a pleasure just to hold one. In my opinion the best combination lens/body options lie with the Zeiss 35 system. The optics are fabulous and the body is still within reach of the average person, although the body has gone up $600.00 since it came out.

Although I want the 50 f1.4 Asph!
__________________
My Gallery



Rolleiflex FX, Yashica Electro 35, Nikon 35 TI, Nikon 28 TI, Widelux F7, Contax TVS III, Zeiss Ikon 35, Minox, Olympus 35 EE3, Konica AA 35, Minox 35 GT, Canonet QL17, and many more....
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-19-2012   #57
wakarimasen
Registered User
 
wakarimasen's Avatar
 
wakarimasen is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bromsgrove, UK
Posts: 712
Here's another way of thinking about it: you could buy cheaper cameras and lenses - there are many PAS's, SLRs and fixed lens RF's that all have some feature to commend them, and equally passionate advocates.

In doing so, you might end up with many cameras (there's always another interesting body or make...) plus the associated lenses (there's always a 50/1.4 which is 'better' than the 50/1.8 etc)

Yet from the resultant haul, you could only ever point, focus and shoot one at any particular time.

Perhaps the Leica route forces some discipline into the user?

In the end, try what you like and keep what you want.

Best regards,
RoyM
__________________
tap tap tap...
Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-19-2012   #58
JMQ
Registered User
 
JMQ is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 558
For me, Leica gear have tangible and intangible qualities. Leica glass is very very good, and the built is also upthere. The mechanical cameras have that smooth hot knife going through butter feel. However, these beauties also require constant care and adjustment -- I suppose you can call them labor of love. I enjoy using them, and do not even try to justify my purchases.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-19-2012   #59
Frontman
Registered User
 
Frontman is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: 東京日本
Posts: 1,509
It is nice to be able to afford the "nicer" things in life; producers of luxury items have even dong very well over the past couple of years while mainstream producers have been facing poor sales and poorer profits.

Why do I have a Leica? I can't honestly argue that it is superior to any other camera I have used. The main reason is that a Leica is seen as something "exclusive", and having such things makes us feel special in a way. It feels good to be able to buy and own things which many people would love to have, but can't afford.

Here in Japan I enjoy watching men driving exotic cars around the city, revving their engines obnoxiously (all they can do is rev in neutral, these cars never go faster than 30 mph in the city), enjoying the attention they get, even though they don't have enough driving skill to get across Ginza without stalling their cars at least once. Many Japanese "photographers" are the same, their cameras are mainly a piece of attention-getting jewelry.

But, expensive things motivate me to make more money, and to justify the expense, I will probably shoot more than I otherwise would, given the little free time that I have. I like Leica stuff, despite the expense.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-19-2012   #60
isoterica
Registered User
 
isoterica is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 187
I think if you can easily afford it, or if you use it for your business and can write it off, or if you save for months or a couple years to purchase it --whatever the case you shouldn't have to justify it to yourself or anyone else for that matter. If it makes you happy then it makes you happy, period. It you are starting to think twice, for whatever reason, then you aren't happy with it anymore and it's time to change up and move on. This is more of a what makes you happy question..
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-19-2012   #61
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 19,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by isoterica View Post
This is more of a what makes you happy question..
Well phrased!

Cheers,

R.
__________________
Now even more free photography information on www.rogerandfrances.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-19-2012   #62
sc_rufctr
Leica nuts
 
sc_rufctr is offline
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Australia
Age: 49
Posts: 942
I don't need to justify anything... I just like taking photos.
__________________
Peter

Adelaide, South Australia
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-19-2012   #63
Timmyjoe
Registered User
 
Timmyjoe's Avatar
 
Timmyjoe is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 595
I get alot of joy out of using my Leica cameras. Only bought one new, back in 2000, when the prices weren't so ridiculous. Got a new 50 lux at the same time. Then a year or so ago I found a new 35 cron asph and having read so many positive things about it, I splurged (cost about the same as the total for my M6 TTL and 50 lux back in 2000). But the images I can create with it are worth it to me.

Needed a wide to go with my used M8.2 and found a Zeiss Biogon 25 that fit the bill nicely, and fit my wallet as well. And just recently found a used 90 cron pre-asph for about the same price as the Zeiss, so I picked that up as well. In the ten months that I've had my used M8.2 I've put over 10,000 shutter actuations on it. And the high quality glass in front of that shutter has helped me to produce some outstanding images.

So, for me, it all was worth every penny.

Best,
-Tim

PS: Making photos is what I do, it's who I am. I'm also happily driving a ten year old Honda, and living the rest of my life on a fairly conservative budget. No desire for expensive cars, or any other expensive toys.
__________________
www.timcarrollphotography.com
Just a few snaps
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-19-2012   #64
f6andBthere
-
 
f6andBthere's Avatar
 
f6andBthere is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 445
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niko View Post
For the first time i am having trouble with this question after i got a Summilux-M 50mm ASPH. It´s a lens i´ve dreamed of, and now that i got it i start wondering if it makes any sense. No matter how good it is, my Mamiya 7II ought to do better in most situations (when i don´t need the speed/closer focusing) ! I sold other stuff to pay for the Summilux (also, i wanted to simplify anyway), and it sure feels better to have less stuff, but i could also have less stuff for a lot less money...

Anyone else struggling with similar thoughts ?

Niko


Hey ... you know that Lux really deserves an M9 behind it ... don't stop now!

As a friend of mine always used to say ... "To hell with the expense, feed the cat another canary!"
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-19-2012   #65
Rayt
Registered User
 
Rayt's Avatar
 
Rayt is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,298
I chose to spend less on other stuff so I could afford the camera kit I wanted. No justification necessary. I think I wasted more money on digital early on than anything else. Now it is just Tri-X and D76.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-19-2012   #66
hausen
Hausen
 
hausen is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Auckland
Posts: 815
Justify always seems like such a negative word to me. Just bought 28 + 50 Summicron over the weekend and after a day with the 28 I am asking myself why I wasted the actuations on my M9 before I bought it. It is just that good. Will sell my Zeiss lenses and won't be to much out of pocket. I had a little self doubt episode a week or so ago about my M9 here on this site and I was quickly put right, so I went out and got the set I wanted, 28/50/90 Summicrons (Already had 90)and now could be happier. Life is to short so look forward, don't look back.
__________________
David
Auckland, NZ

Far too many cameras & lenses!
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-19-2012   #67
sepiareverb
-
 
sepiareverb's Avatar
 
sepiareverb is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,171
Quote:
Originally Posted by hausen View Post
Just bought 28 + 50 Summicron over the weekend and after a day with the 28 I am asking myself why I wasted the actuations on my M9 before I bought it. It is just that good.
Someone else sees it.

They really are that much better.
  Reply With Quote

Second Rate Me
Old 02-19-2012   #68
TR3B
Registered User
 
TR3B is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 37
Second Rate Me

I'm from a little different school. I bought a M8 used because I wanted something smaller than the Canon 1Ds hanging off my neck that looked like an amplifier and felt like a box of rocks. I then put an old Summitar on the Leica and I really liked the look of the images. Recently I bought a 50 version II lux for $700 and like it even more.
I'm sure the ASPH version is much much better, but my old Lux makes me happy when I leave the house.

I'm easily pleased with my $3000 worth of stuff
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-19-2012   #69
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,169
I have the 35mm pre-asph Lux and the 75mm Lux, and I left the door wide open to eventually get a 50mm Lux Asph, as I love using 50mm lenses. One day, I will be (maybe) as happy as you are now Nico. Enjoy this luxury lens and don't ruin the fun with such gloomy ant-GAS thoughts.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-19-2012   #70
35mmdelux
fiat lux יְהִי אוֹר
 
35mmdelux's Avatar
 
35mmdelux is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,212
I drive a Mercedes Benz w/ the slanted windows and don't try to justify that I could go from point A to point B in a Hyundai. There is something existential about shooting with Leica...
__________________
M9 │ 35 f2.0 ASPH BP
M7.58 │ 35 f2.0 ASPH
Domke F-802 │ F-5XB
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-19-2012   #71
Jamie Pillers
Skeptic
 
Jamie Pillers's Avatar
 
Jamie Pillers is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 3,088
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave lackey View Post
If one can afford to buy something, there is no need to "justify" to anyone. If one needs a tool for the business, there is only the business decision. If neither of the aforementioned situations are applicable, one buys what one wants.
I don't think the OP is interested in justification to other people. I think his/her interest is simply what others feel about spending a bunch of $$ on Leica gear and then realizing there might be better alternative uses for that $$.
__________________
Go outside and talk to someone today.

Fuji X-Pro1; X100s; Fuji X20; some film gear sitting on the shelf.

Last edited by Jamie Pillers : 02-19-2012 at 17:34. Reason: incomplete thought
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-19-2012   #72
tbarker13
shooter of stuff
 
tbarker13's Avatar
 
tbarker13 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,665
When I shot film, I justified the expense because I thought the combination of fast lenses and a rangefinder allowed me to shoot in lower light than I could with an SLR.
But when I moved into digital, I realized (sadly) that this realm of available light photography was no longer ruled by Leica.
And while I still believe Leica's lenses are among the best made, I don't see them as being miles ahead of the pack. At least not for my purposes.
So one day I realized I could sell my Leica stuff and get a very capable non-Leica kit - and I would be just as happy with the results of my work. So there I am, today.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-19-2012   #73
zuiko85
Registered User
 
zuiko85 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 748
Tom A., The voice of reason at last! I've always hated the assertion to the effect that 'what's the use of having a Leica M body unless you are also buying Leitz glass'. My CV's are way better than me and this old guy is even considering an Industar for a 50mm lens. Yeah, I know, focus problems etc., I'll deal with that problem when it rears it's fuzzy head.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-19-2012   #74
dap
Registered User
 
dap is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Port Washington, WI
Posts: 146
Can buying leica lenses be justified?

From an objective standpoint (just weighing actual performance vs value)...no way in hell.

Good thing very few of us are objective.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-19-2012   #75
peterm1
Registered User
 
peterm1's Avatar
 
peterm1 is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,145
Quote from The Big Chill Movie
"Jeff Goldblum (Michael): I don't know anyone who could get through the day without two or three juicy rationalizations. They're more important than sex."

And THAT's how I do it!
__________________
Peter M

Flickr me: http://www.flickr.com/photos/80702381@N00/[SIGPIC]
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:44.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.