Nex with alternative / legacy lenses group
Old 01-08-2012   #1
jmilkins
Digited User
 
jmilkins's Avatar
 
jmilkins is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: landdownunder
Posts: 988
Nex with alternative / legacy lenses group

I'll be having some fun experimenting with the Sony Nex 5n and several Leitz, CV and Contax G lenses plus some OM Zuikos...

The focus peaking feature is very easy to use. And I don't miss a viewfinder with the waist level flip out screen...

Started a Flickr group for wider reference..join in! Here's a sample. Contax G 35mm Planar @ 5.6 with Metabones.

[IMG] Untitled by transalper, on Flickr[/IMG]
__________________
cheers, John

My gallery
The FlickR

"To ∞, and beyond!" B. Lightyear, 1995.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-08-2012   #2
peterm1
Registered User
 
peterm1's Avatar
 
peterm1 is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,764
I am loving using my NEX 5 with legacy lenses too - so far I have adapters that allow me to use Leica M; Nikkor F; Canon FL/FD and Pentax screw mount Takumar lenses. (How sad is that - I actually own lenses in all of these systems.)

One thing I have found is that I prefer to rely on the focus zoom function for most focussing when the opportunity allows. I find I can focus better this way than with focus peaking - there is always some doubt as to where the peak actually is, I find. I still use focus peaking for a quick focus when that is required or when I have stopped right down and can rely on DOF to get me through. But all in all - great fun.

My main problem is that I am having such a whale of a time testing lenses of various types that I have not done much serious photogrpahjy with the set up.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-08-2012   #3
Lss
Registered User
 
Lss is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,616
Quote:
Originally Posted by peterm1 View Post
One thing I have found is that I prefer to rely on the focus zoom function for most focussing when the opportunity allows. I find I can focus better this way than with focus peaking - there is always some doubt as to where the peak actually is, I find.
This is pretty much my finding, too. The NEX-5N is pretty easy to focus reliably, when the subject is static and you can magnify (the focus peaking is a very useful focusing aid here), preferably all the way to highest magnification. Otherwise, I don't trust the peaking too much. Sometimes it's perfect, other times I would be much better off scale focusing a fast wide open lens right on the spot.
__________________
Lasse
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-09-2012   #4
jmilkins
Digited User
 
jmilkins's Avatar
 
jmilkins is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: landdownunder
Posts: 988
After a few more hours this afternoon with the G lenses I think you're right with regard to the zoom fucntion. The touch screen makes that easy too. At waist level i'm using my body to lean into the focus point for close up work - it's easier than the slightly ratchety metabones adapter - an unavoidable function of linking to the g lens focussing cam. THe Nex certainly seems easier to focus than my Panasonic GH-1 so far..
__________________
cheers, John

My gallery
The FlickR

"To ∞, and beyond!" B. Lightyear, 1995.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-09-2012   #5
jmilkins
Digited User
 
jmilkins's Avatar
 
jmilkins is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: landdownunder
Posts: 988
with the 45mm planar wide open at close focus distance...
[IMG] Nex planar rose by transalper, on Flickr[/IMG]
__________________
cheers, John

My gallery
The FlickR

"To ∞, and beyond!" B. Lightyear, 1995.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-09-2012   #6
jmilkins
Digited User
 
jmilkins's Avatar
 
jmilkins is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: landdownunder
Posts: 988
Contax G 90mm sonnar
[IMG] the fence by transalper, on Flickr[/IMG]
__________________
cheers, John

My gallery
The FlickR

"To ∞, and beyond!" B. Lightyear, 1995.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-11-2012   #7
jmilkins
Digited User
 
jmilkins's Avatar
 
jmilkins is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: landdownunder
Posts: 988
Here's one from the CV 75mm Colour Heliar wide open at ISO 3200. You can see I missed the focus point, but it's nice rendering for portraiture. The lens handles really well on the Nex 5n.

[IMG] Bel by transalper, on Flickr[/IMG]
__________________
cheers, John

My gallery
The FlickR

"To ∞, and beyond!" B. Lightyear, 1995.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-30-2012   #8
Harley Thor
Registered User
 
Harley Thor is offline
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 30
Anyone have a recommendation for a 200mm prime that is compact and sharp?

I know Nikon and Oly made several that were FF and quite compact in their day. Does anyone have first hand experience using one on a digital camera.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-30-2012   #9
uhoh7
Registered User
 
uhoh7 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harley Thor View Post
Anyone have a recommendation for a 200mm prime that is compact and sharp?

I know Nikon and Oly made several that were FF and quite compact in their day. Does anyone have first hand experience using one on a digital camera.

om 200/5 is lightest 200 I know, reasonably sharp, but the sony 55210 is lighter and roughly same size.

  Reply With Quote

Old 01-31-2012   #10
jmilkins
Digited User
 
jmilkins's Avatar
 
jmilkins is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: landdownunder
Posts: 988
uhoh7 - that is a beautiful image from lovely zuiko glass. To me part of the joy of the Nex is the new life that it can give older lenses. And it might encourage us to re-discover our film body OMs, pentaxs, minoltas nikons canons etc etc!
__________________
cheers, John

My gallery
The FlickR

"To ∞, and beyond!" B. Lightyear, 1995.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-31-2012   #11
jmilkins
Digited User
 
jmilkins's Avatar
 
jmilkins is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: landdownunder
Posts: 988
an example with the Cle Rokkor 40mm /2 @2.8. ISO3200. Note mods in Lightroom however so not original Minolta glass rendering. However, it is a lovely lens to fit on the Nex. As is the CV 40/1.4 if you want more speed.

[IMG] Kiddos by transalper, on Flickr[/IMG]
__________________
cheers, John

My gallery
The FlickR

"To ∞, and beyond!" B. Lightyear, 1995.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-31-2012   #12
kshapero
Exposed
 
kshapero's Avatar
 
kshapero is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida, USA
Age: 66
Posts: 9,098
John some great shots, bravo.
__________________
Akiva S.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kshapero
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-31-2012   #13
kanzlr
Hexaneur
 
kanzlr's Avatar
 
kanzlr is offline
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vienna (Austria)
Age: 35
Posts: 1,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harley Thor View Post
Anyone have a recommendation for a 200mm prime that is compact and sharp?

I know Nikon and Oly made several that were FF and quite compact in their day. Does anyone have first hand experience using one on a digital camera.
the late Minolta 200/4 MD is VERY nice, sharp and light.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-31-2012   #14
uhoh7
Registered User
 
uhoh7 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmilkins View Post
uhoh7 - that is a beautiful image from lovely zuiko glass. To me part of the joy of the Nex is the new life that it can give older lenses. And it might encourage us to re-discover our film body OMs, pentaxs, minoltas nikons canons etc etc!
ty for kind words. more often i use the nikkor 180 AIS ED

  Reply With Quote

Old 01-31-2012   #15
Disaster_Area
Gadget Monger
 
Disaster_Area's Avatar
 
Disaster_Area is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 875
The CV 25mm Snapshot Skopar has fast become my favorite lens on my Nex 3, set to hyperfocal it's an amazing street lens.







__________________
http://jbhildebrand.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-31-2012   #16
Harley Thor
Registered User
 
Harley Thor is offline
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 30
I just got done ordering the Canon FDn 200mm F/4.0

I didn't see your MD recommendation, but, I investigated both the Nikkor and Zuiko OM lenses of the same speed and focal length

The Canon FDn is light and not too long or wide, and it focuses the closest at 1.5 m.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-01-2012   #17
Smiert Spionam
Registered User
 
Smiert Spionam is offline
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harley Thor View Post
I just got done ordering the Canon FDn 200mm F/4.0

I didn't see your MD recommendation, but, I investigated both the Nikkor and Zuiko OM lenses of the same speed and focal length

The Canon FDn is light and not too long or wide, and it focuses the closest at 1.5 m.
I suspect you'll be pretty happy with it. I recently bought one (so inexpensive it's almost comic), and it seems generally on par with the Nikon 200/4 AIS. Plenty sharp from wide open, though fringing is an issue in high contrast transitions. Stopping down a little helps with that quite a bit.

I'm mostly a Nikon shooter, but I've largely standardized on Canon FD for my NEX primes, and I'm very happy I did. Their 50/1.4 (FDn and FD SSC are optically identical, so far as I can tell from testing both) is easily better than Nikon's 1.4s, and as good as anything, short of an ASPH Leica. I also recently picked up an FDn 100/2, and it's stunning. It handles very nicely, and is actually sharper than the Nikon 105/2.5 AI/AIS at equivalent stops, which is remarkable. That gives me 50/1.4, 100/2, and 200/4, all of which have slim barrels, 52mm threads, and share a common compact NEX adapter. Still not sure about whether to add a 24/2 FD, or to try a rangefinder wide in that range.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-01-2012   #18
35mmdelux
Fight On!
 
35mmdelux's Avatar
 
35mmdelux is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,238
I've got my 35 summilux pre-asph on my NEX-5n. Love shooting the combo.
__________________
M-E │ 21 asph │ 35 asph │ 50 apo-classic │ 75 apo │ Harley-Davidson FatBoy
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-01-2012   #19
uhoh7
Registered User
 
uhoh7 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,558
28 cron makes a decent normal
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-01-2012   #20
kxl
Social Documentary
 
kxl's Avatar
 
kxl is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sunny SoCal
Posts: 2,514
A short-eared owl (?) - NEX5 with Canon 400mm/4.5 FD


__________________
Keith
My website

"... I thought the only way to give us an incentive, to bring hope, is to show the pictures of the pristine planet - to see the innocence. ― Sebastiao Salgado
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-01-2012   #21
kxl
Social Documentary
 
kxl's Avatar
 
kxl is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sunny SoCal
Posts: 2,514
With ZM 18/4.

__________________
Keith
My website

"... I thought the only way to give us an incentive, to bring hope, is to show the pictures of the pristine planet - to see the innocence. ― Sebastiao Salgado
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-02-2012   #22
kossi008
Photon Counter
 
kossi008's Avatar
 
kossi008 is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dresden, Germany
Age: 49
Posts: 910
Quote:
Originally Posted by Disaster_Area View Post
The CV 25mm Snapshot Skopar has fast become my favorite lens on my Nex 3, set to hyperfocal it's an amazing street lens.
And I do like your b/w conversion. How do you do it?
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-02-2012   #23
j j
Registered User
 
j j is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 798
Quote:
Originally Posted by kxl View Post
A short-eared owl (?)
Sharp-shinned Hawk by the looks of it.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-02-2012   #24
Disaster_Area
Gadget Monger
 
Disaster_Area's Avatar
 
Disaster_Area is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 875
Quote:
Originally Posted by kossi008 View Post
And I do like your b/w conversion. How do you do it?
Thanks! I don't have one single process that works for all images. Most are converted to B&W with a gradient overlay in PS, sometimes I'll use PS's B&W adjustment layer tool. I find the adjustment layer works better if there's large areas of red in the image. Tonally, a reds and a blues encountered in real life, especially clothing have the same lightness, so a gradient overly will render them as the same shade of grey, so in this case I'd use an adjustment layer to get one of the colors to pop.

The gradient overlay can also be tricky, the less contrast in the original image, the more contrast the gradient will give to the B&W, and vice versa... it's a great tool for some images and craptastic for others.

After black and white conversion, I have a few PS actions I've put together to do a micro-contrast boost, an edge only sharpen and a slight high pass overlay. It took me a while to develop them, I was trying to emulate the results I was getting with Neopan 100.
__________________
http://jbhildebrand.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-02-2012   #25
Smiert Spionam
Registered User
 
Smiert Spionam is offline
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by j j View Post
Sharp-shinned Hawk by the looks of it.
Yep, probably. Here's a good ID page, with some tips on distinguishing a Sharp-shinned from a Cooper's Hawk:

http://www.birds.cornell.edu/pfw/Abo...terIDtable.htm

Now, back to lenses....

;- )
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-02-2012   #26
kossi008
Photon Counter
 
kossi008's Avatar
 
kossi008 is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dresden, Germany
Age: 49
Posts: 910
Quote:
Originally Posted by Disaster_Area View Post
Thanks! I don't have one single process that works for all images. Most are converted to B&W with a gradient overlay in PS, sometimes I'll use PS's B&W adjustment layer tool. (...)
Thanks for the info; I'll have to try that. I am frustrated by the fact that my digital b/w shots always turn out rather bland, and distinctly "digital"-looking. Have to fiddle more with the process, I guess...
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-24-2012   #27
jmilkins
Digited User
 
jmilkins's Avatar
 
jmilkins is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: landdownunder
Posts: 988
Here's Nex 5n with the Canon Serenar 50m 1.5 @f4. The lens has some haze, but it seems ok to me..this is a crop of around 50% of the frame.

[IMG] Bella repose by transalper, on Flickr[/IMG]
__________________
cheers, John

My gallery
The FlickR

"To ∞, and beyond!" B. Lightyear, 1995.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-24-2012   #28
craygc
Registered User
 
craygc's Avatar
 
craygc is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ballarat, Victoria
Age: 56
Posts: 1,044
Any excuse to post some B&W Nex 5n shots...

VC 50mm f/2 Nickel Heliar


Leica 21mm Asph Elmarit


Leica 21mm Asph Elmarit


Leica 21mm Asph Elmarit


Leica 35mm Asph Lux


Leica 35mm Asph Lux
__________________
Craig Cooper
Australia
Photo Stream
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-25-2012   #29
Speedfreak
-
 
Speedfreak is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 223
Good shots Craig, looking surprisingly "full frame". Well done.
  Reply With Quote

Gradient overlay?
Old 06-25-2012   #30
behyer
Registered User
 
behyer is offline
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 25
Gradient overlay?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Disaster_Area View Post
Thanks! I don't have one single process that works for all images. Most are converted to B&W with a gradient overlay in PS, sometimes I'll use PS's B&W adjustment layer ...

The gradient overlay can also be tricky, the less contrast in the original image, the more contrast the gradient will give to the B&W, and vice versa... it's a great tool for some images and craptastic for others.

After black and white conversion, I have a few PS actions I've put together to do a micro-contrast boost, an edge only sharpen and a slight high pass overlay. It took me a while to develop them, I was trying to emulate the results I was getting with Neopan 100.
I agree that your b/w conversion process is excellent. What exactly is the gradient overlay that you mention? I can see the high pass, and the selective color b/w conversion (adjustment layer), both used to great effect, but what's the gradient overlay?

Great street shots!
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-26-2012   #31
Speedfreak
-
 
Speedfreak is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by behyer View Post
but what's the gradient overlay?
Probably a curve / levels layer masked with a gradient. (Ever worked with masks and layers in Photoshop?)
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-26-2012   #32
behyer
Registered User
 
behyer is offline
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 25
Yes, I work in Photoshop all the time, and masking adjustment layers is an everyday thing. Maybe he's talking about a Curves layer, or maybe he's using one BW conversion for part of the picture and another one for other parts. I do that sometimes.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-26-2012   #33
rogue_designer
Reciprocity Failure
 
rogue_designer's Avatar
 
rogue_designer is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Age: 40
Posts: 2,373
I've been using it with the CV 21mm/4 (and my Canon 35mm/1.8 LTM)



Mostly in BW, but now that I have built a color shift/vignette correction mask, more color will be forthcoming.



__________________
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
Usually using: M4, Canon P, Rolleiflex 3.5C, Fuji X Pro 1, Canon 5D MkII, Horseman VHR, Horseman 45LX

---
My Flickr | StreetLevel Photography
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-12-2012   #34
Summicronj
Registered User
 
Summicronj is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 41

one day by Analogick, on Flickr
nex 5n 50mm preasph summilux e46
carmel, ca

Last edited by Summicronj : 08-12-2012 at 22:36. Reason: pic
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-27-2012   #35
Cron
Registered User
 
Cron is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vienna
Posts: 572
Sony 5n with Olympus Zuiko

__________________
see some pics here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/smallrf/
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-27-2012   #36
uhoh7
Registered User
 
uhoh7 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,558
my new backcountry lens:

Contax 100-300
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-06-2012   #37
kutitta
Registered User
 
kutitta's Avatar
 
kutitta is offline
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmilkins View Post
I'll be having some fun experimenting with the Sony Nex 5n and several Leitz, CV and Contax G lenses plus some OM Zuikos...

The focus peaking feature is very easy to use. And I don't miss a viewfinder with the waist level flip out screen...

Started a Flickr group for wider reference..join in!
I just received my NEX 5N yesterday, and posted my first shot below to the flickr group.

I used Leitz Elmar-C 90/4 and high rich monochrome setting for this shot

__________________
35mm Rangefinder: Leica CL | Yashica Electro 35 GSN | Olympus XA
35mm SLR: Olympus OM2-N | Minolta Maxxum 700si | Minolta Maxxum 9000 | Zenit 12XP | Ricoh KR-10 | Nikon FG-20 | Canon EOS 50
DSLR: Konica Minolta Maxxum 7D
35mm Zonefinder: Olympus Trip 35
35mm P&S: Olympus mju, Olympus mju zoom 140, Minolta Weathermatic 35, Canon ML AF 35
CSC: Sony NEX 5N

--------------

http://500px.com/kutay
http://www.redbubble.com/people/kutayk/portfolio
http://www.flickr.com/photos/kutayk/
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-06-2012   #38
kokoshawnuff
Registered User
 
kokoshawnuff's Avatar
 
kokoshawnuff is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 572

NEX 5N, Leica APO Telyt R 180, Novoflex adapter


NEX 5N, Leica MEM 90, Novoflex adapter
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-07-2012   #39
peter_n
~
 
peter_n's Avatar
 
peter_n is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 8,785
Straight JPEGs from a NEX-7 & 35mm Summicron ASPH. The first three are with the Novoflex adapter and the fourth with the LME helicoid adapter.





















__________________
_
~Peter

My RFF Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-07-2012   #40
hteasley
Pupil
 
hteasley is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,725
Just joined the flickr group, and posted the following two photos, taken with my NEX-7 and my 1934 f/2 5cm Summar.





Taken back-to-back, trying different processing ideas.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 18:06.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.