35m SUMMARON (2.8 or 3.5) - Rangefinderforum.com

Mark Forums Read

		Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Leica M Film Cameras
35m SUMMARON (2.8 or 3.5)

Prev

Previous Post

Next Post

Next

01-21-2012	#23
Mudman Registered User Mudman is offline Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Saratoga Springs Posts: 948	What do these go for now? I think I paid about $175 for my f3.5 a couple of years ago. __________________ "Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships." ~Ansel Adams

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts vB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Summaron 3.5 compare to Summaron 2.8	terrafirmanada	Rangefinder Photography Discussion	16	08-21-2007 01:42
Will An ITDOO Shade Vignette On A Summaron 3.5?	Stu W	Leica M Film Cameras	0	10-05-2006 11:45
Bought a Summaron 3.5	Stu W	Leica M Film Cameras	5	09-05-2006 15:17
Leica Elmar 50mm 2.8 vs 3.5	Marko	Leica M Film Cameras	18	03-10-2006 20:36
Nokton Vs 3.5 Summaron Vs 35f2 Canon	djon	Canon RF	16	11-06-2005 06:14

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 16:44.

Mark Forums Read | View Forum Leaders